Hammering nails with a screwdriver: how GPs perceive video consultations.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0010
Magnus Repstad Wanderås, Eirik Abildsnes, Elin Thygesen, Santiago Gil Martinez
{"title":"Hammering nails with a screwdriver: how GPs perceive video consultations.","authors":"Magnus Repstad Wanderås, Eirik Abildsnes, Elin Thygesen, Santiago Gil Martinez","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of video consultation (VC) expanded considerably, with GPs indicating high satisfaction with it. However, use of VC declined as lockdown measures were eased.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore reasons why VC use has declined in Norwegian general practice since the start of the pandemic by investigating GPs' experiences with VC and their attitudes towards it in a post-pandemic setting.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 13 GPs in southern Norway between May 2022 and March 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data analysis was conducted by applying the six steps of Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the implementation of VCs was unplanned, most participants were able to use this modality without much problem. Several GPs initially envisioned long-term VC use. However, despite certain positives, VCs were largely sidelined in favour of face-to-face and telephone consultations, owing to their practicality and VC's limited usefulness when considering the extra effort required. Nonetheless, GPs recognised ways of using VC that might exploit its strengths, but they highlighted how its sustained use would require them to replace other consultation modalities. They also identified extrinsic factors that might lead to the increased use of VC, including improved VC technology and patient demand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although VC is now part of many GPs' consultation toolboxes, its perceived relative lack of usefulness and extra effort compared with other remote consultation modalities mean that most GPs have chosen to abandon it as a routine consultation modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of video consultation (VC) expanded considerably, with GPs indicating high satisfaction with it. However, use of VC declined as lockdown measures were eased.

Aim: To explore reasons why VC use has declined in Norwegian general practice since the start of the pandemic by investigating GPs' experiences with VC and their attitudes towards it in a post-pandemic setting.

Design & setting: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 13 GPs in southern Norway between May 2022 and March 2023.

Method: Data analysis was conducted by applying the six steps of Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Although the implementation of VCs was unplanned, most participants were able to use this modality without much problem. Several GPs initially envisioned long-term VC use. However, despite certain positives, VCs were largely sidelined in favour of face-to-face and telephone consultations, owing to their practicality and VC's limited usefulness when considering the extra effort required. Nonetheless, GPs recognised ways of using VC that might exploit its strengths, but they highlighted how its sustained use would require them to replace other consultation modalities. They also identified extrinsic factors that might lead to the increased use of VC, including improved VC technology and patient demand.

Conclusion: Although VC is now part of many GPs' consultation toolboxes, its perceived relative lack of usefulness and extra effort compared with other remote consultation modalities mean that most GPs have chosen to abandon it as a routine consultation modality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用螺丝刀敲钉子":全科医生如何看待视频会诊。
背景:在Covid-19大流行初期,视频会诊(VC)的使用范围大幅扩大,全科医生对此表示非常满意。目的:通过调查自大流行开始以来全科医生使用视频会诊的经验,以及他们在大流行结束后对视频会诊的态度,探讨挪威全科医生使用视频会诊减少的原因:定性研究设计。对挪威南部的 13 名全科医生进行了半结构化访谈:数据分析方法是布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法:结果:尽管自愿咨询的实施是计划外的,但大多数参与者都能顺利地使用这种方式。几位全科医生最初设想长期使用自愿咨询。然而,尽管有一些积极因素,但由于面对面咨询和电话咨询的实用性,以及考虑到需要付出额外的努力,VC 的实用性有限,VC 在很大程度上被弃置一旁,转而使用面对面咨询和电话咨询。尽管如此,全科医生还是认识到了可以利用视频会议优势的方法,但他们强调,要持续使用视频会议,就必须取代其他会诊方式。他们还指出了可能导致更多使用 VC 的外在因素,包括 VC 技术的改进和患者的需求:尽管虚拟视像已成为许多全科医生咨询工具箱中的一部分,但与其他远程咨询方式相比,虚拟视像被认为相对缺乏实用性,而且需要付出额外的努力,这意味着大多数全科医生选择放弃将其作为常规咨询方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study. Mental healthcare and pragmatic shared decision-making in general practice: An interview study. Treating the perimenopause in the UK armed forces: a mixed methods review exploring the confidence of general practitioners. Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person paediatric consultations and role of the carers. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1