Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128
Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Moore, Debra Westlake, Kamal Mahtani, David Nunan, Kerryn Husk, Shoba Dawson, Jane Smith, Emma Fuller, Lilly Sabir, Pauline Roberts, Obioha Ukoumunne
{"title":"Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Moore, Debra Westlake, Kamal Mahtani, David Nunan, Kerryn Husk, Shoba Dawson, Jane Smith, Emma Fuller, Lilly Sabir, Pauline Roberts, Obioha Ukoumunne","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) link workers (LWs) listen to patients' concerns and difficulties, and connect them to relevant community assets (groups, organisations, or charities) that can help with their non-medical issues (for example, loneliness, debt, housing). LW retention is key to sustaining SP within primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine occupational self-efficacy, job discrepancy, and other factors as potential predictors of LWs' intentions to leave or remain in their posts.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional survey involving LWs from the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed via SP-related organisations. Questions were on the following: (a) intention to leave the role; (b) demographics; and (c) role experience, including occupational self-efficacy and discrepancy between expectations and reality of the job. Questions were mainly closed, although some allowed LWs to provide a written response. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors, and content analysis used to categorise open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 342 questionnaire responses were included in the analysis. Higher job discrepancy was associated with past (odds ratio [OR] per 30 unit <i>increase</i> = 6.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.91 to 12.0; <i>P</i><0.001) and future (OR = 4.86; 95% CI = 2.70 to 8.72; <i>P</i><0.001) intentions to leave, while lower occupational self-efficacy was associated only with past intentions to leave (OR per 10 unit <i>decrease</i> = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.93; <i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight factors influencing LW retention, offering a foundation for targeted interventions, which could include clearer communication about the role during recruitment, and adjusting job descriptions and support when required.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social prescribing (SP) link workers (LWs) listen to patients' concerns and difficulties, and connect them to relevant community assets (groups, organisations, or charities) that can help with their non-medical issues (for example, loneliness, debt, housing). LW retention is key to sustaining SP within primary care.

Aim: To examine occupational self-efficacy, job discrepancy, and other factors as potential predictors of LWs' intentions to leave or remain in their posts.

Design & setting: Cross-sectional survey involving LWs from the United Kingdom.

Method: An online questionnaire was distributed via SP-related organisations. Questions were on the following: (a) intention to leave the role; (b) demographics; and (c) role experience, including occupational self-efficacy and discrepancy between expectations and reality of the job. Questions were mainly closed, although some allowed LWs to provide a written response. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors, and content analysis used to categorise open-ended responses.

Results: In total, 342 questionnaire responses were included in the analysis. Higher job discrepancy was associated with past (odds ratio [OR] per 30 unit increase = 6.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.91 to 12.0; P<0.001) and future (OR = 4.86; 95% CI = 2.70 to 8.72; P<0.001) intentions to leave, while lower occupational self-efficacy was associated only with past intentions to leave (OR per 10 unit decrease = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.93; P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Findings highlight factors influencing LW retention, offering a foundation for targeted interventions, which could include clearer communication about the role during recruitment, and adjusting job descriptions and support when required.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
链接工人考虑离职的相关因素:一项横断面调查。
背景:社会处方(SP)联系工作者(LWs)倾听患者的关切和困难,并将他们与相关的社区资产(团体/组织/慈善机构)联系起来,以帮助他们解决非医疗问题(如孤独、债务、住房)。保留LW是在初级保健中维持SP的关键。目的:探讨职业自我效能感、工作差异等因素对低薪员工离职或留任意向的潜在影响。设计与设置:横断面调查涉及来自英国的LWs。方法:通过sp相关组织进行在线问卷调查。问题是:a)离职意向,b)人口统计,以及c)角色经验,包括职业自我效能感和工作期望与现实之间的差异。问题主要是不公开的,尽管有些问题允许法律工作者提供书面答复。拟合逻辑回归模型以确定预测因子,并使用内容分析对开放式响应进行分类。结果:342份问卷被纳入分析。较高的工作差异与过去(每30单位增加的优势比[OR] =6.86;95% CI: 3.91 ~ 12.0;P=0.003)和未来(OR=4.86;95% CI: 2.70 ~ 8.72;较低的职业自我效能感仅与过去离职意图相关(每减少10个单位的OR =1.91;95% CI: 1.24 ~ 2.93;P = 0.003)。结论:研究结果突出了影响LW保留的因素,为有针对性的干预提供了基础,包括在招聘过程中更清晰地沟通LW的角色,并在需要时调整工作描述和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
English general practice in a period of change: a mixed-methods study of staff and patient perspectives. Ethnicity and clinical empathy in primary care consultations: a web-based experiment. Strengthening integration of pathways into general practice in Australia: a virtual workshop study with stakeholders. Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study. Patients' experiences of phosphatidylethanol in hypertension treatment in primary care: qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1