The association between neighborhood disadvantage and frailty: A retrospective case series.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036241258876
David Fenton, Amani Allen, Johnathan R Kent, Rachel Nordgren, Allison Liu, Nihar Rama, Ally Wang, Daniel Rubin, Lauren J Gleason, A Justine Landi, Megan Huisingh-Scheetz, Mark K Ferguson, Maria Lucia L Madariaga
{"title":"The association between neighborhood disadvantage and frailty: A retrospective case series.","authors":"David Fenton, Amani Allen, Johnathan R Kent, Rachel Nordgren, Allison Liu, Nihar Rama, Ally Wang, Daniel Rubin, Lauren J Gleason, A Justine Landi, Megan Huisingh-Scheetz, Mark K Ferguson, Maria Lucia L Madariaga","doi":"10.1177/22799036241258876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty predicts poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Recent studies have found socioeconomic status to be an important characteristic for surgical outcomes. We evaluated the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), two geospatial atlases that provide a multidimensional evaluation of neighborhood deprivation, with frailty in a surgery population.</p><p><strong>Design & methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients undergoing routine frailty screening was conducted 12/2020-8/2022. Frailty was measured using Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the five-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). ADI and SVI quartiles were determined using patient residence. Logistic regression models were used to evaluated associations of FFP (frail only vs not frail) and mFI-5 (≥2 vs 0-1) with ADI and SVI (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 372 screened patients, 41% (154) were women, median age was 68% (63-74), and 46% (170) identified as non-White. Across ADI and SVI quartiles, higher number of comorbidities, decreasing median income, and frailty were associated with increasing deprivation (<i>p</i> < 0.01). When controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and BMI category, frailty by FFP was associated with the most deprived two quartiles of ADI (OR 2.61, CI: [1.35-5.03], <i>p</i> < 0.01) and the most deprived quartile of SVI (OR 2.33, [1.10-4.95], <i>p</i> < 0.05). These trends were also seen with mFI-5 scores ≥2 (ADI: OR 1.64, [1.02-2.63], <i>p</i> < 0.05; SVI: OR 1.71, [1.01-2.91], <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical patients living in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods are more likely to be frail. Interventions may include screening of disadvantaged populations and resource allocation to vulnerable neighborhoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"13 2","pages":"22799036241258876"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036241258876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty predicts poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Recent studies have found socioeconomic status to be an important characteristic for surgical outcomes. We evaluated the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), two geospatial atlases that provide a multidimensional evaluation of neighborhood deprivation, with frailty in a surgery population.

Design & methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing routine frailty screening was conducted 12/2020-8/2022. Frailty was measured using Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the five-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). ADI and SVI quartiles were determined using patient residence. Logistic regression models were used to evaluated associations of FFP (frail only vs not frail) and mFI-5 (≥2 vs 0-1) with ADI and SVI (α = 0.05).

Results: Of 372 screened patients, 41% (154) were women, median age was 68% (63-74), and 46% (170) identified as non-White. Across ADI and SVI quartiles, higher number of comorbidities, decreasing median income, and frailty were associated with increasing deprivation (p < 0.01). When controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and BMI category, frailty by FFP was associated with the most deprived two quartiles of ADI (OR 2.61, CI: [1.35-5.03], p < 0.01) and the most deprived quartile of SVI (OR 2.33, [1.10-4.95], p < 0.05). These trends were also seen with mFI-5 scores ≥2 (ADI: OR 1.64, [1.02-2.63], p < 0.05; SVI: OR 1.71, [1.01-2.91], p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Surgical patients living in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods are more likely to be frail. Interventions may include screening of disadvantaged populations and resource allocation to vulnerable neighborhoods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻里劣势与体弱之间的关系:回顾性病例系列
背景:虚弱预示着手术患者的预后较差。最近的研究发现,社会经济状况是影响手术效果的一个重要特征。我们评估了地区贫困指数(ADI)和社会脆弱性指数(SVI)与手术人群虚弱程度的关系:2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 8 月,对接受常规虚弱筛查的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。虚弱程度采用弗里德虚弱表型(FFP)和五项修正虚弱指数(mFI-5)进行测量。ADI 和 SVI 四分位数根据患者居住地确定。采用逻辑回归模型评估 FFP(仅虚弱 vs 不虚弱)和 mFI-5(≥2 vs 0-1)与 ADI 和 SVI 的相关性(α = 0.05):在 372 名接受筛查的患者中,41%(154 人)为女性,年龄中位数为 68%(63-74 岁),46%(170 人)为非白人。在 ADI 和 SVI 四分位数中,合并症数量增加、收入中位数下降和体弱与贫困程度增加相关(p p p p p 结论:生活在社会经济贫困地区的手术患者更有可能体弱多病。干预措施可包括筛查弱势人群和为弱势社区分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
期刊最新文献
Factors on medical clerkship students' quality of life: A survey study. Magseed preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions: Our single-center Breast Unit experience. Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview. Reproducibility and explainability in digital pathology: The need to make black-box artificial intelligence systems more transparent. Healthcare students are faced with the issue of the rights of people with disabilities and the quality of services: Are we training future healthcare workers who overemphasize technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1