Governance for Earth system tipping points – A research agenda

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2024.100216
Manjana Milkoreit , Emily Boyd , Sara M. Constantino , Vera Helene Hausner , Dag O. Hessen , Andreas Kääb , Duncan McLaren , Christina Nadeau , Karen O'Brien , Frans-Jan Parmentier , Ronny Rotbarth , Rolf Rødven , Désirée Treichler , Elana Wilson-Rowe , Yulia Yamineva
{"title":"Governance for Earth system tipping points – A research agenda","authors":"Manjana Milkoreit ,&nbsp;Emily Boyd ,&nbsp;Sara M. Constantino ,&nbsp;Vera Helene Hausner ,&nbsp;Dag O. Hessen ,&nbsp;Andreas Kääb ,&nbsp;Duncan McLaren ,&nbsp;Christina Nadeau ,&nbsp;Karen O'Brien ,&nbsp;Frans-Jan Parmentier ,&nbsp;Ronny Rotbarth ,&nbsp;Rolf Rødven ,&nbsp;Désirée Treichler ,&nbsp;Elana Wilson-Rowe ,&nbsp;Yulia Yamineva","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tipping points in the Earth system could be passed within the Paris Agreement's temperature goal range (1.5°C–2°C). Tipping processes are a feature of complex Earth system dynamics that present major governance challenges not addressed by existing global governance institutions. The common governance toolkit is a poor match for dealing with tipping processes, especially non-linear change, and radical intertemporality. To support the development of effective responses to anticipated, rapid state changes in the Earth system, there is an urgent need for new interdisciplinary research programs focused specifically on tipping-point governance. We distinguish two domains of action in a multi-phase framework - prevention and impact governance - and identify key research areas and questions that need to be addressed. These include developing governance principles, identifying actors and institutions that should be involved or need to be created, and determining the appropriate temporal and spatial scales for governance efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000168/pdfft?md5=7bfffdd5fae3058fa711fe08bbaf0fdf&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811624000168-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tipping points in the Earth system could be passed within the Paris Agreement's temperature goal range (1.5°C–2°C). Tipping processes are a feature of complex Earth system dynamics that present major governance challenges not addressed by existing global governance institutions. The common governance toolkit is a poor match for dealing with tipping processes, especially non-linear change, and radical intertemporality. To support the development of effective responses to anticipated, rapid state changes in the Earth system, there is an urgent need for new interdisciplinary research programs focused specifically on tipping-point governance. We distinguish two domains of action in a multi-phase framework - prevention and impact governance - and identify key research areas and questions that need to be addressed. These include developing governance principles, identifying actors and institutions that should be involved or need to be created, and determining the appropriate temporal and spatial scales for governance efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球系统临界点治理--研究议程
地球系统的临界点可能会在《巴黎协定》的温度目标范围(1.5°C-2°C)内出现。临界过程是复杂地球系统动力学的一个特征,它提出了现有全球治理机构无法解决的重大治理挑战。常见的治理工具包与应对倾覆过程,特别是非线性变化和剧烈的时际变化不匹配。为了支持制定有效应对地球系统中预期的快速状态变化的措施,迫切需要开展专门侧重于临界点治理的新的跨学科研究计划。我们在多阶段框架中区分了两个行动领域--预防和影响治理,并确定了需要解决的关键研究领域和问题。其中包括制定治理原则、确定应该参与或需要建立的参与者和机构,以及确定治理工作的适当时空尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1