Trends and disparities in arrhythmia-related deaths among older adults in the United States, 1999–2020

Muhammad Rafay Shahzad Cheema , Abdulqadir J. Nashwan
{"title":"Trends and disparities in arrhythmia-related deaths among older adults in the United States, 1999–2020","authors":"Muhammad Rafay Shahzad Cheema ,&nbsp;Abdulqadir J. Nashwan","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines mortality trends and disparities in arrhythmia-related deaths among older adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Utilizing mortality data from the CDC WONDER database, we analyzed over 3 million arrhythmia-related deaths identified by ICD-10 codes I47.0-I49.9. The study computed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) to assess trends across demographic groups and geographical locations. Statistical techniques, including Joinpoint regression analysis, were employed to examine demographic and regional trends in mortality rates. The overall ASMR for arrhythmia-related deaths increased from 38.0 per 10,000 in 1999 to 47.0 in 2020. The trend showed a decline from 1999 to 2009 (APC: −0.9), followed by increases from 2009 to 2018 (APC: 1.5) and a significant rise from 2018 to 2020 (APC: 7.4). Men had higher ASMRs than women (45.2 vs. 33.0), with significant increases observed in both sexes in recent years. Racial disparities were evident, with Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites having the highest ASMR (40.5), followed by NH Blacks (31.1), NH American Indians/Alaska Natives (28.3), Hispanics (22.7), and NH Asians/Pacific Islanders (19.7). Geographic disparities were also prominent, with Vermont exhibiting the highest ASMR (55.8) and Nevada the lowest (24.9). The Midwest region had the highest regional ASMR (41.2), while nonmetropolitan areas consistently showed higher rates than metropolitan areas (42.1 vs. 37.2). These findings highlight significant disparities in arrhythmia-related mortality, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address these public health challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000720/pdfft?md5=7f7c6278d611694dcb954ea055137a69&pid=1-s2.0-S2949916X24000720-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines mortality trends and disparities in arrhythmia-related deaths among older adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Utilizing mortality data from the CDC WONDER database, we analyzed over 3 million arrhythmia-related deaths identified by ICD-10 codes I47.0-I49.9. The study computed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) to assess trends across demographic groups and geographical locations. Statistical techniques, including Joinpoint regression analysis, were employed to examine demographic and regional trends in mortality rates. The overall ASMR for arrhythmia-related deaths increased from 38.0 per 10,000 in 1999 to 47.0 in 2020. The trend showed a decline from 1999 to 2009 (APC: −0.9), followed by increases from 2009 to 2018 (APC: 1.5) and a significant rise from 2018 to 2020 (APC: 7.4). Men had higher ASMRs than women (45.2 vs. 33.0), with significant increases observed in both sexes in recent years. Racial disparities were evident, with Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites having the highest ASMR (40.5), followed by NH Blacks (31.1), NH American Indians/Alaska Natives (28.3), Hispanics (22.7), and NH Asians/Pacific Islanders (19.7). Geographic disparities were also prominent, with Vermont exhibiting the highest ASMR (55.8) and Nevada the lowest (24.9). The Midwest region had the highest regional ASMR (41.2), while nonmetropolitan areas consistently showed higher rates than metropolitan areas (42.1 vs. 37.2). These findings highlight significant disparities in arrhythmia-related mortality, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address these public health challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1999-2020 年美国老年人心律失常相关死亡的趋势和差异
本研究探讨了 1999 年至 2020 年美国老年人心律失常相关死亡的死亡率趋势和差异。利用疾病预防控制中心 WONDER 数据库中的死亡率数据,我们分析了超过 300 万例与心律失常相关的死亡病例,这些病例均由 ICD-10 编码 I47.0-I49.9 确定。研究计算了年龄标准化死亡率 (ASMR),以评估不同人口群体和地理位置的趋势。研究采用了包括联点回归分析在内的统计技术,以检查死亡率的人口和地区趋势。心律失常相关死亡的总体 ASMR 从 1999 年的万分之 38.0 上升到 2020 年的万分之 47.0。趋势显示,1999 年至 2009 年期间死亡率有所下降(APC:-0.9),2009 年至 2018 年期间死亡率有所上升(APC:1.5),2018 年至 2020 年期间死亡率显著上升(APC:7.4)。男性的 ASMRs 比女性高(45.2 对 33.0),近年来观察到男性和女性的 ASMRs 都显著增加。种族差异明显,非西班牙裔(NH)白人的 ASMR 最高(40.5),其次是 NH 黑人(31.1)、NH 美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(28.3)、西班牙裔(22.7)和 NH 亚洲人/太平洋岛民(19.7)。地域差异也很明显,佛蒙特州的 ASMR 最高(55.8),内华达州最低(24.9)。中西部地区的 ASMR 最高(41.2),而非大都市地区的 ASMR 一直高于大都市地区(42.1 对 37.2)。这些发现凸显了心律失常相关死亡率的显著差异,强调了有必要采取有针对性的干预措施来应对这些公共卫生挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India Persistent blepharospasm and bradyphrenia following Artery of Percheron infarction Revised clinical standards for assessing sepsis: Serum iron level as an emerging biomarker Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care Cancer screening among sexual minority groups in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1