Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care

Abiodun Adegbesan , Adewunmi Akingbola , Olajide Ojo , Otumara Urowoli Jessica , Uthman Hassan Alao , Uchechukwu Shagaya , Olajumoke Adewole , Owolabi Abdullahi
{"title":"Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care","authors":"Abiodun Adegbesan ,&nbsp;Adewunmi Akingbola ,&nbsp;Olajide Ojo ,&nbsp;Otumara Urowoli Jessica ,&nbsp;Uthman Hassan Alao ,&nbsp;Uchechukwu Shagaya ,&nbsp;Olajumoke Adewole ,&nbsp;Owolabi Abdullahi","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into palliative care offers the possibility of improved patient outcomes through enhanced decision-making, personalized care, and reduced healthcare provider burden. However, the use of AI in this sensitive area presents significant ethical challenges which require serious consideration to ensure that technology serves the best interests of patients without compromising their rights or well-being. This narrative review explores the key ethical issues associated with AI in palliative care, with a focus on low-resource settings where these challenges are often intensified. The review examines essential ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, and identifies critical concerns including data privacy, informed consent, algorithmic bias, and the risk of depersonalizing care. It also highlights the unique difficulties faced in low-resource environments, where the lack of infrastructure and regulatory frameworks can exacerbate these ethical risks. To address these challenges, the review offers actionable recommendations, such as developing context-specific guidelines, promoting transparency and accountability through explainable AI (XAI), and conducting regular ethical audits. Interdisciplinary collaboration is emphasized to ensure that AI systems are ethically designed and implemented, respecting cultural contexts and upholding patient dignity. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on ethical AI integration in healthcare, indicating the need for careful consideration of ethical principles to ensure that AI enhances rather than undermines the compassionate care at the heart of palliative care. These findings serve as a foundation for future research and policy development in this emerging field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24001117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into palliative care offers the possibility of improved patient outcomes through enhanced decision-making, personalized care, and reduced healthcare provider burden. However, the use of AI in this sensitive area presents significant ethical challenges which require serious consideration to ensure that technology serves the best interests of patients without compromising their rights or well-being. This narrative review explores the key ethical issues associated with AI in palliative care, with a focus on low-resource settings where these challenges are often intensified. The review examines essential ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, and identifies critical concerns including data privacy, informed consent, algorithmic bias, and the risk of depersonalizing care. It also highlights the unique difficulties faced in low-resource environments, where the lack of infrastructure and regulatory frameworks can exacerbate these ethical risks. To address these challenges, the review offers actionable recommendations, such as developing context-specific guidelines, promoting transparency and accountability through explainable AI (XAI), and conducting regular ethical audits. Interdisciplinary collaboration is emphasized to ensure that AI systems are ethically designed and implemented, respecting cultural contexts and upholding patient dignity. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on ethical AI integration in healthcare, indicating the need for careful consideration of ethical principles to ensure that AI enhances rather than undermines the compassionate care at the heart of palliative care. These findings serve as a foundation for future research and policy development in this emerging field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在姑息治疗中整合人工智能的伦理挑战
将人工智能(AI)整合到姑息治疗中,可以通过增强决策、个性化护理和减轻医疗保健提供者的负担来改善患者的预后。然而,在这一敏感领域使用人工智能带来了重大的伦理挑战,需要认真考虑,以确保技术服务于患者的最佳利益,同时不损害他们的权利或福祉。这篇叙述性综述探讨了与姑息治疗中人工智能相关的关键伦理问题,重点关注这些挑战往往加剧的低资源环境。该审查审查了基本的伦理原则,如自主、慈善、非恶意和正义,并确定了关键问题,包括数据隐私、知情同意、算法偏见和去个性化护理的风险。它还强调了在资源匮乏的环境中面临的独特困难,在这些环境中,缺乏基础设施和监管框架可能会加剧这些道德风险。为了应对这些挑战,审查提出了可行的建议,例如制定针对具体情况的指导方针,通过可解释的人工智能(XAI)提高透明度和问责制,以及定期进行道德审计。强调跨学科合作,以确保人工智能系统的设计和实施符合道德规范,尊重文化背景并维护患者尊严。这项研究有助于正在进行的关于人工智能在医疗保健中的伦理整合的讨论,表明需要仔细考虑伦理原则,以确保人工智能增强而不是破坏姑息治疗核心的富有同情心的护理。这些发现为这一新兴领域的未来研究和政策制定奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India Persistent blepharospasm and bradyphrenia following Artery of Percheron infarction Revised clinical standards for assessing sepsis: Serum iron level as an emerging biomarker Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care Cancer screening among sexual minority groups in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1