The benefits of an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.
{"title":"The benefits of an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.","authors":"Yueping Liu, Xin Xu, Xiaoyan Ye","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) has been introduced for the postoperative cancer management, but its application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare. This current study constructed an offline to online CBSM (OO-CBSM) program and applying multiple assessing scales, aiming at exploring the benefits of OO-CBSM regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life (QoL) in postoperative ICC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study randomly assigned 68 postoperative ICC patients into OO-CBSM (N = 34) and normal care (NC) (N = 34) groups to undergo 10-week interventions. Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety scale (SAS), and depression scale (SDS), functional-assessment of chronic-illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed within 6 months (M).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HADS-anxiety scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.009), SAS score at M6 (P = 0.028), HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.043), and SDS scores at M3 (P = 0.044) and M6 (P = 0.028), were lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group. Meanwhile, FACIT-Sp scores at M1 (P = 0.042) and M6 (P = 0.003) were higher in the OO-CBSM group over the NC group. Besides, EQ-5D scores at M3 (P = 0.067) and M6 (P = 0.087) disclosed trends to be lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group, but not statistically significant. QLQ-C30-global-health scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.033), and QLQ-C30-function score at M6 (P = 0.046), were higher in OO-CBSM group over NC group; but QLQ-C30-symptom score was not significantly different at any timepoints between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OO-CBSM attenuates anxiety and depression, and advances spiritual well-being and QoL in postoperative ICC patients, indicating its potency for the ICC postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) has been introduced for the postoperative cancer management, but its application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare. This current study constructed an offline to online CBSM (OO-CBSM) program and applying multiple assessing scales, aiming at exploring the benefits of OO-CBSM regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life (QoL) in postoperative ICC patients.
Methods: The study randomly assigned 68 postoperative ICC patients into OO-CBSM (N = 34) and normal care (NC) (N = 34) groups to undergo 10-week interventions. Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety scale (SAS), and depression scale (SDS), functional-assessment of chronic-illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed within 6 months (M).
Results: HADS-anxiety scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.009), SAS score at M6 (P = 0.028), HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.043), and SDS scores at M3 (P = 0.044) and M6 (P = 0.028), were lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group. Meanwhile, FACIT-Sp scores at M1 (P = 0.042) and M6 (P = 0.003) were higher in the OO-CBSM group over the NC group. Besides, EQ-5D scores at M3 (P = 0.067) and M6 (P = 0.087) disclosed trends to be lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group, but not statistically significant. QLQ-C30-global-health scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.033), and QLQ-C30-function score at M6 (P = 0.046), were higher in OO-CBSM group over NC group; but QLQ-C30-symptom score was not significantly different at any timepoints between them.
Conclusion: OO-CBSM attenuates anxiety and depression, and advances spiritual well-being and QoL in postoperative ICC patients, indicating its potency for the ICC postoperative management.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.