The benefits of an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14093
Yueping Liu, Xin Xu, Xiaoyan Ye
{"title":"The benefits of an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.","authors":"Yueping Liu, Xin Xu, Xiaoyan Ye","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) has been introduced for the postoperative cancer management, but its application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare. This current study constructed an offline to online CBSM (OO-CBSM) program and applying multiple assessing scales, aiming at exploring the benefits of OO-CBSM regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life (QoL) in postoperative ICC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study randomly assigned 68 postoperative ICC patients into OO-CBSM (N = 34) and normal care (NC) (N = 34) groups to undergo 10-week interventions. Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety scale (SAS), and depression scale (SDS), functional-assessment of chronic-illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed within 6 months (M).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HADS-anxiety scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.009), SAS score at M6 (P = 0.028), HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.043), and SDS scores at M3 (P = 0.044) and M6 (P = 0.028), were lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group. Meanwhile, FACIT-Sp scores at M1 (P = 0.042) and M6 (P = 0.003) were higher in the OO-CBSM group over the NC group. Besides, EQ-5D scores at M3 (P = 0.067) and M6 (P = 0.087) disclosed trends to be lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group, but not statistically significant. QLQ-C30-global-health scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.033), and QLQ-C30-function score at M6 (P = 0.046), were higher in OO-CBSM group over NC group; but QLQ-C30-symptom score was not significantly different at any timepoints between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OO-CBSM attenuates anxiety and depression, and advances spiritual well-being and QoL in postoperative ICC patients, indicating its potency for the ICC postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) has been introduced for the postoperative cancer management, but its application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare. This current study constructed an offline to online CBSM (OO-CBSM) program and applying multiple assessing scales, aiming at exploring the benefits of OO-CBSM regarding anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life (QoL) in postoperative ICC patients.

Methods: The study randomly assigned 68 postoperative ICC patients into OO-CBSM (N = 34) and normal care (NC) (N = 34) groups to undergo 10-week interventions. Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety scale (SAS), and depression scale (SDS), functional-assessment of chronic-illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed within 6 months (M).

Results: HADS-anxiety scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.009), SAS score at M6 (P = 0.028), HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.043), and SDS scores at M3 (P = 0.044) and M6 (P = 0.028), were lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group. Meanwhile, FACIT-Sp scores at M1 (P = 0.042) and M6 (P = 0.003) were higher in the OO-CBSM group over the NC group. Besides, EQ-5D scores at M3 (P = 0.067) and M6 (P = 0.087) disclosed trends to be lower in the OO-CBSM group versus the NC group, but not statistically significant. QLQ-C30-global-health scores at M3 (P = 0.049) and M6 (P = 0.033), and QLQ-C30-function score at M6 (P = 0.046), were higher in OO-CBSM group over NC group; but QLQ-C30-symptom score was not significantly different at any timepoints between them.

Conclusion: OO-CBSM attenuates anxiety and depression, and advances spiritual well-being and QoL in postoperative ICC patients, indicating its potency for the ICC postoperative management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从离线到在线认知行为压力管理对肝内胆管癌术后患者的焦虑、抑郁、精神健康和生活质量的益处。
目的:认知行为压力管理(CBSM)已被引入癌症术后管理,但其在肝内胆管癌(ICC)中的应用却很少见。本研究构建了一个从线下到线上的心理行为压力管理(OO-CBSM)方案,并应用多种评估量表,旨在探讨OO-CBSM在ICC术后患者焦虑、抑郁、精神幸福感和生活质量(QoL)方面的益处:研究将 68 名 ICC 术后患者随机分为 OO-CBSM 组(34 人)和普通护理组(34 人),分别进行为期 10 周的干预。在6个月(M)内对医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁量表(SDS)、慢性病治疗功能评估-精神幸福量表(FACIT-Sp)、欧洲生活质量5维度(EQ-5D)和生活质量问卷-核心30(QLQ-C30)进行评估:结果:与NC组相比,OO-CBSM组在M3(P=0.049)和M6(P=0.009)时的HADS-焦虑评分、M6(P=0.028)时的SAS评分、M3(P=0.043)时的HADS-抑郁评分以及M3(P=0.044)和M6(P=0.028)时的SDS评分均较低。同时,OO-CBSM 组在 M1(P = 0.042)和 M6(P = 0.003)的 FACIT-Sp 评分高于 NC 组。此外,与 NC 组相比,OO-CBSM 组在 M3(P = 0.067)和 M6(P = 0.087)的 EQ-5D 分数呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义。OO-CBSM组在M3(P = 0.049)和M6(P = 0.033)的QLQ-C30总体健康评分和在M6(P = 0.046)的QLQ-C30功能评分均高于NC组;但两者在任何时间点的QLQ-C30症状评分均无明显差异:结论:OO-CBSM 可减轻 ICC 术后患者的焦虑和抑郁,提高其精神幸福感和 QoL,表明其在 ICC 术后管理中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Management Experience of T1 Glottic Cancer Treated by CO2 Laser Surgery: A Cohort of 173 Patients. Smoking Cessation Practices in Australian Oncology Settings: A Cross-Sectional Study of Who, How, and When. Evaluating the Effect of Oral Famotidine in Preventing Hypersensitivity Reactions in Individuals Receiving Platinum-Based Agents or Taxanes. A Comparison of Australian Oncology Clinicians' Smoking Cessation Care Practices for People Who Currently Smoke Versus Those Who Report Recently Stopping Smoking. Efficacy and Safety of Four Weeks of Moderately Hypofractionated Chemoradiation for Unresectable, Stage 3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1