Feasibility of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Using GPT-4 Vision for the Classification of Middle Ear Disease: Qualitative Study and Validation.

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.2196/58342
Masao Noda, Hidekane Yoshimura, Takuya Okubo, Ryota Koshu, Yuki Uchiyama, Akihiro Nomura, Makoto Ito, Yutaka Takumi
{"title":"Feasibility of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Using GPT-4 Vision for the Classification of Middle Ear Disease: Qualitative Study and Validation.","authors":"Masao Noda, Hidekane Yoshimura, Takuya Okubo, Ryota Koshu, Yuki Uchiyama, Akihiro Nomura, Makoto Ito, Yutaka Takumi","doi":"10.2196/58342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning models, has transformed the landscape of medical technology, especially in the field of diagnosis using imaging and physiological data. In otolaryngology, AI has shown promise in image classification for middle ear diseases. However, existing models often lack patient-specific data and clinical context, limiting their universal applicability. The emergence of GPT-4 Vision (GPT-4V) has enabled a multimodal diagnostic approach, integrating language processing with image analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of GPT-4V in diagnosing middle ear diseases by integrating patient-specific data with otoscopic images of the tympanic membrane.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The design of this study was divided into two phases: (1) establishing a model with appropriate prompts and (2) validating the ability of the optimal prompt model to classify images. In total, 305 otoscopic images of 4 middle ear diseases (acute otitis media, middle ear cholesteatoma, chronic otitis media, and otitis media with effusion) were obtained from patients who visited Shinshu University or Jichi Medical University between April 2010 and December 2023. The optimized GPT-4V settings were established using prompts and patients' data, and the model created with the optimal prompt was used to verify the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4V on 190 images. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4V with that of physicians, 30 clinicians completed a web-based questionnaire consisting of 190 images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multimodal AI approach achieved an accuracy of 82.1%, which is superior to that of certified pediatricians at 70.6%, but trailing behind that of otolaryngologists at more than 95%. The model's disease-specific accuracy rates were 89.2% for acute otitis media, 76.5% for chronic otitis media, 79.3% for middle ear cholesteatoma, and 85.7% for otitis media with effusion, which highlights the need for disease-specific optimization. Comparisons with physicians revealed promising results, suggesting the potential of GPT-4V to augment clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its advantages, challenges such as data privacy and ethical considerations must be addressed. Overall, this study underscores the potential of multimodal AI for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient care in otolaryngology. Further research is warranted to optimize and validate this approach in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"3 ","pages":"e58342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning models, has transformed the landscape of medical technology, especially in the field of diagnosis using imaging and physiological data. In otolaryngology, AI has shown promise in image classification for middle ear diseases. However, existing models often lack patient-specific data and clinical context, limiting their universal applicability. The emergence of GPT-4 Vision (GPT-4V) has enabled a multimodal diagnostic approach, integrating language processing with image analysis.

Objective: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of GPT-4V in diagnosing middle ear diseases by integrating patient-specific data with otoscopic images of the tympanic membrane.

Methods: The design of this study was divided into two phases: (1) establishing a model with appropriate prompts and (2) validating the ability of the optimal prompt model to classify images. In total, 305 otoscopic images of 4 middle ear diseases (acute otitis media, middle ear cholesteatoma, chronic otitis media, and otitis media with effusion) were obtained from patients who visited Shinshu University or Jichi Medical University between April 2010 and December 2023. The optimized GPT-4V settings were established using prompts and patients' data, and the model created with the optimal prompt was used to verify the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4V on 190 images. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4V with that of physicians, 30 clinicians completed a web-based questionnaire consisting of 190 images.

Results: The multimodal AI approach achieved an accuracy of 82.1%, which is superior to that of certified pediatricians at 70.6%, but trailing behind that of otolaryngologists at more than 95%. The model's disease-specific accuracy rates were 89.2% for acute otitis media, 76.5% for chronic otitis media, 79.3% for middle ear cholesteatoma, and 85.7% for otitis media with effusion, which highlights the need for disease-specific optimization. Comparisons with physicians revealed promising results, suggesting the potential of GPT-4V to augment clinical decision-making.

Conclusions: Despite its advantages, challenges such as data privacy and ethical considerations must be addressed. Overall, this study underscores the potential of multimodal AI for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient care in otolaryngology. Further research is warranted to optimize and validate this approach in diverse clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 GPT-4 视觉进行中耳疾病分类的多模态人工智能的可行性:定性研究与验证。
背景:人工智能(AI),尤其是深度学习模型的融合改变了医疗技术的面貌,特别是在利用成像和生理数据进行诊断的领域。在耳鼻喉科领域,人工智能已在中耳疾病的图像分类方面显示出前景。然而,现有模型往往缺乏特定患者的数据和临床背景,限制了其普遍适用性。GPT-4 Vision(GPT-4V)的出现使语言处理与图像分析相结合的多模态诊断方法成为可能:在这项研究中,我们调查了 GPT-4V 在诊断中耳疾病方面的有效性,它将患者的特定数据与鼓膜的耳镜图像相结合:本研究的设计分为两个阶段:(1)建立一个具有适当提示的模型;(2)验证最佳提示模型对图像进行分类的能力。研究人员从 2010 年 4 月至 2023 年 12 月期间到信州大学或吉祥医科大学就诊的患者身上共获取了 305 张耳镜图像,这些图像涉及 4 种中耳疾病(急性中耳炎、中耳胆脂瘤、慢性中耳炎和中耳炎伴渗出)。利用提示和患者数据建立了最佳的 GPT-4V 设置,并使用根据最佳提示创建的模型在 190 张图像上验证了 GPT-4V 的诊断准确性。为了将 GPT-4V 的诊断准确性与医生的诊断准确性进行比较,30 位临床医生填写了一份包含 190 张图像的网络问卷:结果:多模态人工智能方法的准确率为 82.1%,高于认证儿科医生的 70.6%,但落后于耳鼻喉科医生的 95% 以上。该模型针对特定疾病的准确率分别为:急性中耳炎 89.2%、慢性中耳炎 76.5%、中耳胆脂瘤 79.3%、中耳炎伴渗出 85.7%,这凸显了针对特定疾病进行优化的必要性。与医生的比较结果显示,GPT-4V 有助于临床决策:结论:尽管GPT-4V具有诸多优势,但仍需应对数据隐私和伦理考虑等挑战。总之,这项研究强调了多模态人工智能在提高耳鼻喉科诊断准确性和改善患者护理方面的潜力。在不同的临床环境中优化和验证这种方法还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Appropriate Representation in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Imagery: Protocol for a Methodological Approach to Address Skin Tone Bias. How Explainable Artificial Intelligence Can Increase or Decrease Clinicians' Trust in AI Applications in Health Care: Systematic Review. Targeting COVID-19 and Human Resources for Health News Information Extraction: Algorithm Development and Validation. Understanding AI's Role in Endometriosis Patient Education and Evaluating Its Information and Accuracy: Systematic Review. Identifying Marijuana Use Behaviors Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness Using a Machine Learning-Based Framework: Development and Evaluation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1