Electroaerodynamic thrusters: Influence of a freestream on the current, ionic wind, and force produced by a DC corona discharge

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Journal of Electrostatics Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.elstat.2024.103950
Sylvain Grosse, Nicolas Benard, Eric Moreau
{"title":"Electroaerodynamic thrusters: Influence of a freestream on the current, ionic wind, and force produced by a DC corona discharge","authors":"Sylvain Grosse,&nbsp;Nicolas Benard,&nbsp;Eric Moreau","doi":"10.1016/j.elstat.2024.103950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the past few decades, atmospheric plasma propulsion has sustained a growth of interest. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of light air-breathing plasma-propelled aircraft near ground level. Typically, corona discharge actuators are employed. Yet, the effects of the freestream velocity on the discharge current, ionic wind, and thrust must be characterized. The present study focuses on a wire-to-cylinder and a wire-to-airfoil actuators in a wind tunnel in a co-flow configuration. Discharge current and PIV (particle image velocimetry) measurements were used to determine both the differences between the two collecting electrodes and the aforementioned effects of the freestream velocity. The measured current follows the modeling already reported in the literature with a linear increase of the current with the freestream velocity. Besides, an interaction occurs with the charge density between the electrodes, which strengthens the rise of the current with the velocity as the voltage increases. In the study, the charge density increases linearly with the voltage with a slope of 0.75 mC/m<sup>2</sup>/kV for both collectors. However, the airfoil collector results in a higher current than the cylinder at the same voltage. The local velocity increases in three main regions thanks to the ionic wind. With both actuators, a higher velocity was captured with actuation on the upper and lower surfaces of the collectors. With the cylinder, the interelectrode region experiences a notable rise in velocity as well. In all cases, the air velocity downstream of the actuators is increased by the actuation. The ionic wind is usually less than 1 m/s (around 0.3–0.5 m/s on average) and its effect on the incoming flow decreases when the velocity increases up to 10 m/s. The force was calculated in control volumes around the actuators. For both actuators, the electroaerodynamic (EAD) force is governed by the current, and at constant current, the same EAD force is obtained with the two collectors. Yet, the force decreases with the drag of the collector, leading to a cancellation of the thrust when the drag exceeds the EAD force. At the maximum current tested in the study, the cylinder collector cancels the thrust at around 3 m/s of freestream against 5 m/s with the airfoil, showing that this type of propulsion is currently only applicable to low-speed aircraft.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrostatics","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 103950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrostatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304388624000573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past few decades, atmospheric plasma propulsion has sustained a growth of interest. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of light air-breathing plasma-propelled aircraft near ground level. Typically, corona discharge actuators are employed. Yet, the effects of the freestream velocity on the discharge current, ionic wind, and thrust must be characterized. The present study focuses on a wire-to-cylinder and a wire-to-airfoil actuators in a wind tunnel in a co-flow configuration. Discharge current and PIV (particle image velocimetry) measurements were used to determine both the differences between the two collecting electrodes and the aforementioned effects of the freestream velocity. The measured current follows the modeling already reported in the literature with a linear increase of the current with the freestream velocity. Besides, an interaction occurs with the charge density between the electrodes, which strengthens the rise of the current with the velocity as the voltage increases. In the study, the charge density increases linearly with the voltage with a slope of 0.75 mC/m2/kV for both collectors. However, the airfoil collector results in a higher current than the cylinder at the same voltage. The local velocity increases in three main regions thanks to the ionic wind. With both actuators, a higher velocity was captured with actuation on the upper and lower surfaces of the collectors. With the cylinder, the interelectrode region experiences a notable rise in velocity as well. In all cases, the air velocity downstream of the actuators is increased by the actuation. The ionic wind is usually less than 1 m/s (around 0.3–0.5 m/s on average) and its effect on the incoming flow decreases when the velocity increases up to 10 m/s. The force was calculated in control volumes around the actuators. For both actuators, the electroaerodynamic (EAD) force is governed by the current, and at constant current, the same EAD force is obtained with the two collectors. Yet, the force decreases with the drag of the collector, leading to a cancellation of the thrust when the drag exceeds the EAD force. At the maximum current tested in the study, the cylinder collector cancels the thrust at around 3 m/s of freestream against 5 m/s with the airfoil, showing that this type of propulsion is currently only applicable to low-speed aircraft.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电空气动力推进器:自由流对直流电晕放电产生的电流、离子风和力的影响
在过去几十年里,人们对大气等离子体推进技术的兴趣与日俱增。最近的研究表明,在地面附近制造轻型喷气等离子推进飞机是可行的。通常采用电晕放电致动器。然而,必须确定自由流速度对放电电流、离子风和推力的影响。本研究的重点是在风洞中采用共流配置的线对圆筒和线对翼面致动器。放电电流和 PIV(粒子图像测速仪)测量用于确定两个收集电极之间的差异以及上述自由流速度的影响。测量到的电流与文献中报道的模型一致,电流随自由流速度呈线性增长。此外,电极之间的电荷密度也会产生相互作用,随着电压的增加,电荷密度会加强电流随速度的上升。在研究中,两种集热器的电荷密度均随电压线性增加,斜率均为 0.75 mC/m2/kV。然而,在相同电压下,翼面集电器的电流比圆筒集电器大。离子风使三个主要区域的局部速度增加。使用两种致动器时,在集热器的上下表面致动时会获得更高的速度。使用气缸时,电极间区域的速度也显著提高。在所有情况下,致动器下游的气流速度都会因为致动器的启动而增加。离子风的速度通常小于 1 米/秒(平均约为 0.3-0.5 米/秒),当速度增加到 10 米/秒时,离子风对气流的影响会减小。力是在致动器周围的控制体积中计算得出的。对于两个推杆,电动气动力(EAD)力都受电流影响,在恒定电流下,两个集流器获得的电动气动力相同。然而,该力会随着收集器阻力的增加而减小,当阻力超过 EAD 力时,推力就会被抵消。在研究中测试的最大电流下,圆筒形集流器在自由流速度约为 3 米/秒时会抵消推力,而翼面集流器为 5 米/秒,这表明这种推进方式目前仅适用于低速飞行器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electrostatics
Journal of Electrostatics 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
81
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrostatics is the leading forum for publishing research findings that advance knowledge in the field of electrostatics. We invite submissions in the following areas: Electrostatic charge separation processes. Electrostatic manipulation of particles, droplets, and biological cells. Electrostatically driven or controlled fluid flow. Electrostatics in the gas phase.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimisation of CuO/AC, Fe2O3/AC synergistic multi-electrode DBD reactor for degradation of ATZ in water Triboelectric charging of polydisperse particles in a developed pipe flow Effect of field emission on contact spark in the spark test apparatus A theoretical approach towards developing space charge formation in lossy dielectrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1