Infant mortality and social causality: Lessons from the history of Britain’s public health movement, c. 1834–1914

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY British Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13121
Elias Nosrati, Michael P. Kelly, Simon Szreter
{"title":"Infant mortality and social causality: Lessons from the history of Britain’s public health movement, c. 1834–1914","authors":"Elias Nosrati,&nbsp;Michael P. Kelly,&nbsp;Simon Szreter","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What are the historical conditions under which a sociologically informed understanding of health inequality can emerge in the public sphere? We seek to address this question through the lens of a strategically chosen historical puzzle—the stubborn persistence of and salient variation in high infant mortality rates across British industrial towns at the dawn of the previous century—as analysed by Arthur Newsholme, the Medical Officer of the Local Government Board. In doing so, we retrace the historical processes through which the evolving public health movement gradually helped crystallise a scientific understanding of the social causes of excess mortality. We map the dominant ideology of the public sphere at the time, chart the shifting roles of the state, and retrace the historical origins and emergence of ‘public health’ as a distinctive category of state policy and public discourse. We situate the public health movement in this historical configuration and identify the cracks in the existing ideological and administrative edifice through which this movement was able to articulate a novel approach to population health—one that spotlights the political economy of social inequality. We relate this historical sequence to the rise of industrial capitalism, the social fractures that it spawned, and the organised counter-movements that it necessitated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"75 5","pages":"681-699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.13121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are the historical conditions under which a sociologically informed understanding of health inequality can emerge in the public sphere? We seek to address this question through the lens of a strategically chosen historical puzzle—the stubborn persistence of and salient variation in high infant mortality rates across British industrial towns at the dawn of the previous century—as analysed by Arthur Newsholme, the Medical Officer of the Local Government Board. In doing so, we retrace the historical processes through which the evolving public health movement gradually helped crystallise a scientific understanding of the social causes of excess mortality. We map the dominant ideology of the public sphere at the time, chart the shifting roles of the state, and retrace the historical origins and emergence of ‘public health’ as a distinctive category of state policy and public discourse. We situate the public health movement in this historical configuration and identify the cracks in the existing ideological and administrative edifice through which this movement was able to articulate a novel approach to population health—one that spotlights the political economy of social inequality. We relate this historical sequence to the rise of industrial capitalism, the social fractures that it spawned, and the organised counter-movements that it necessitated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿死亡率与社会因果关系:英国公共卫生运动史(约 1834-1914 年)的启示。
在什么样的历史条件下,公共领域才会出现对健康不平等的社会学理解?我们试图通过战略性地选择一个历史谜题--上世纪初英国工业城镇婴儿死亡率居高不下的顽固现象和显著差异--来解决这个问题,地方政府委员会医务官阿瑟-纽肖尔姆(Arthur Newsholme)对此进行了分析。在此过程中,我们回溯了不断发展的公共卫生运动逐渐帮助人们对死亡率过高的社会原因形成科学认识的历史进程。我们描绘了当时公共领域的主流意识形态,描绘了国家角色的转变,并追溯了 "公共卫生 "作为国家政策和公共话语的一个独特类别的历史起源和兴起。我们将公共卫生运动置于这一历史格局中,并找出现有意识形态和行政架构中的裂缝,通过这些裂缝,公共卫生运动得以阐明一种新的人口健康方法--一种凸显社会不平等的政治经济学方法。我们将这一历史序列与工业资本主义的崛起、它所催生的社会裂痕以及它所需要的有组织的反运动联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: British Journal of Sociology is published on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is unique in the United Kingdom in its concentration on teaching and research across the full range of the social, political and economic sciences. Founded in 1895 by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the LSE is one of the largest colleges within the University of London and has an outstanding reputation for academic excellence nationally and internationally. Mission Statement: • To be a leading sociology journal in terms of academic substance, scholarly reputation , with relevance to and impact on the social and democratic questions of our times • To publish papers demonstrating the highest standards of scholarship in sociology from authors worldwide; • To carry papers from across the full range of sociological research and knowledge • To lead debate on key methodological and theoretical questions and controversies in contemporary sociology, for example through the annual lecture special issue • To highlight new areas of sociological research, new developments in sociological theory, and new methodological innovations, for example through timely special sections and special issues • To react quickly to major publishing and/or world events by producing special issues and/or sections • To publish the best work from scholars in new and emerging regions where sociology is developing • To encourage new and aspiring sociologists to submit papers to the journal, and to spotlight their work through the early career prize • To engage with the sociological community – academics as well as students – in the UK and abroad, through social media, and a journal blog.
期刊最新文献
Lagging behind by doing good: How volunteering prolongs unemployment. The dispositif is alive! Recovering social agents in Foucauldian analysis. The social life of creative methods: Filmmaking, fabulation and recovery. Disruptive diversity: Exploring racial commodification in the Norwegian cultural field. The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1