Comparison of three different in vitro digestion methods for carbohydrates

Yahao Xiao, Sheng Li, Jiaxi Li, Yanlan Bi, Xuebing Xu, Hong Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of three different in vitro digestion methods for carbohydrates","authors":"Yahao Xiao,&nbsp;Sheng Li,&nbsp;Jiaxi Li,&nbsp;Yanlan Bi,&nbsp;Xuebing Xu,&nbsp;Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s13197-024-06012-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spectrophotometer method, ELISA, and High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) method have been widely used to quantify and characterize the glucose released from rice after in vitro digestion. Despite this, the results of the three methods may not be comparable. This work investigated the limitation of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the glucose released after in vitro rice digestion. Intra-day and inter-day precision were evaluated through analyzing the contents of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), DS (RDS + slowly digestible starch (SDS)), and total starch (TS). Tests of accuracies were also conducted. The results demonstrated that all three methods showed good linear correlations, i.e., y = 0.3417x + 0.0799 (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.994), y = 0.1719x + 0.0900 (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.993), and y = 58078x + 6039.4 (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.999), respectively. Concerning the LOD and LOQ, HPAEC-PAD showed the lowest 0.07 and 0.24 mg/L, followed by the Spectrophotometer of 2.72 and 9.07 mg/L. ELISA showed the highest 9.95 and 33.16 mg/L. The recoveries of these methods ranged from 98.62% to 100.56%, 99.05% to 102.72%, and 96.71% to 103.27%, respectively. HPAEC-PAD method had lower contents of RDS, DS, and TS, indicating it may be poor. Combining above factors, Spectrophotometer was chosen and used in digestion of biscuits and steamed buns. RS of biscuits was the highest, possibly due to the formation of lipid-starch complex. Additionally, steamed buns had the highest RDS. These observations suggested that Spectrophotometer method was suitable for accurately and reproducibly analyzing carbohydrate digestion in different food systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":"62 1","pages":"88 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7010,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13197-024-06012-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spectrophotometer method, ELISA, and High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) method have been widely used to quantify and characterize the glucose released from rice after in vitro digestion. Despite this, the results of the three methods may not be comparable. This work investigated the limitation of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the glucose released after in vitro rice digestion. Intra-day and inter-day precision were evaluated through analyzing the contents of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), DS (RDS + slowly digestible starch (SDS)), and total starch (TS). Tests of accuracies were also conducted. The results demonstrated that all three methods showed good linear correlations, i.e., y = 0.3417x + 0.0799 (r2 = 0.994), y = 0.1719x + 0.0900 (r2 = 0.993), and y = 58078x + 6039.4 (r2 = 0.999), respectively. Concerning the LOD and LOQ, HPAEC-PAD showed the lowest 0.07 and 0.24 mg/L, followed by the Spectrophotometer of 2.72 and 9.07 mg/L. ELISA showed the highest 9.95 and 33.16 mg/L. The recoveries of these methods ranged from 98.62% to 100.56%, 99.05% to 102.72%, and 96.71% to 103.27%, respectively. HPAEC-PAD method had lower contents of RDS, DS, and TS, indicating it may be poor. Combining above factors, Spectrophotometer was chosen and used in digestion of biscuits and steamed buns. RS of biscuits was the highest, possibly due to the formation of lipid-starch complex. Additionally, steamed buns had the highest RDS. These observations suggested that Spectrophotometer method was suitable for accurately and reproducibly analyzing carbohydrate digestion in different food systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较三种不同的碳水化合物体外消化方法
分光光度计法、酶联免疫吸附法和高效阴离子交换色谱-脉冲安培检测(HPAEC-PAD)法被广泛用于水稻体外消化后葡萄糖的定量和表征。尽管如此,这三种方法的结果可能不具有可比性。本文研究了水稻体外消化后释放葡萄糖的检测限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)。通过分析快速消化淀粉(RDS)、快速消化淀粉(RDS +慢消化淀粉(SDS))和总淀粉(TS)含量,评价日内和日间精密度。还进行了准确性测试。结果表明,3种方法均具有良好的线性相关性,分别为y = 0.3417x + 0.0799 (r2 = 0.994)、y = 0.1719x + 0.0900 (r2 = 0.993)、y = 58078x + 6039.4 (r2 = 0.999)。检出限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)以HPAEC-PAD最低,分别为0.07和0.24 mg/L,其次为2.72和9.07 mg/L。酶联免疫吸附测定结果最高,分别为9.95和33.16 mg/L。加样回收率分别为98.62% ~ 100.56%、99.05% ~ 102.72%和96.71% ~ 103.27%。HPAEC-PAD法RDS、DS、TS含量较低,可能是较差的方法。综合以上因素,选择分光光度计用于饼干和馒头的消化。饼干的RS最高,可能是由于脂质-淀粉复合物的形成。此外,馒头的RDS最高。结果表明,分光光度法可准确、重复性地分析不同食物体系中碳水化合物的消化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Current trends in the determination of microbiological indicators of dairy products Advances in cheese safety and quality: harnessing irradiation technologies for enhanced preservation Optimizing protein quality and bioactive peptide production in almond-based dairy alternatives through lactic acid fermentation and enzyme-assisted hydrolysis for cardiovascular health benefits Nano-edible coatings for quality enhancement and shelf-life extension of fruits and vegetables Chitosan research progress for smart packaging applications: a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1