A Comparison between the Western Understanding of Logos and the Asian Understanding of Dao

Shu Wang
{"title":"A Comparison between the Western Understanding of Logos and the Asian Understanding of Dao","authors":"Shu Wang","doi":"10.62051/fcd8b844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparative study of Logos in the West and Dao in China has never stopped in academic circles. In a sense, Heraclitus' Logos and Laozi's Dao, which came into being in the same axial era, can be regarded as the starting point of Chinese and western philosophy respectively. They are similar in meaning, both of which are constant and contain Dialectic, But whether viewed from the perspective of ontology or epistemology, the differences between them are extremely obvious. This paper intends to make a comparison between Dao and Logos from the different aspects of Chinese and Western ontology, and point out the differences between them from the purpose and way of cognition, as well as the value orientation and development path in the process of cognition. Clarifying this problem will not only help us to deepen our understanding of Logos and Dao, but also help the academic community to deeply explore why the starting points of Chinese and Western philosophy are very similar but have completely different cultural paths.","PeriodicalId":512428,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62051/fcd8b844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comparative study of Logos in the West and Dao in China has never stopped in academic circles. In a sense, Heraclitus' Logos and Laozi's Dao, which came into being in the same axial era, can be regarded as the starting point of Chinese and western philosophy respectively. They are similar in meaning, both of which are constant and contain Dialectic, But whether viewed from the perspective of ontology or epistemology, the differences between them are extremely obvious. This paper intends to make a comparison between Dao and Logos from the different aspects of Chinese and Western ontology, and point out the differences between them from the purpose and way of cognition, as well as the value orientation and development path in the process of cognition. Clarifying this problem will not only help us to deepen our understanding of Logos and Dao, but also help the academic community to deeply explore why the starting points of Chinese and Western philosophy are very similar but have completely different cultural paths.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西方对 "道 "的理解与亚洲对 "道 "的理解的比较
西方的 "道 "与中国的 "逻各斯 "的比较研究在学术界从未停止过。从某种意义上说,产生于同一轴心时代的赫拉克利特的 "逻各斯 "和老子的 "道",可以分别视为中西方哲学的起点。二者意义相近,都是恒常的,都包含辩证法,但无论是从本体论还是从认识论的角度来看,二者的差异都是极其明显的。本文拟从中西本体论的不同侧面对 "道 "与 "逻各斯 "进行比较,并从认识的目的、方式以及认识过程中的价值取向和发展路径等方面指出二者的差异。厘清这一问题,不仅有助于我们加深对 "道 "与 "逻各斯 "的理解,也有助于学界深入探讨为什么中西哲学的出发点十分相似,却有着完全不同的文化路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mining Chinese Animation Movie Audience Concern Themes Based on BERTopic and UGC Research on the impact of digital transformation on the high-quality development of enterprises Design of Consumer Confidence Prediction Index Model based on DEGWO Algorithm AIGC empowers research on the communication path of red culture in six places in Liaoning Applicability and legal consequences of the criminal conciliation procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1