Applicability and legal consequences of the criminal conciliation procedure

Huimin Shao
{"title":"Applicability and legal consequences of the criminal conciliation procedure","authors":"Huimin Shao","doi":"10.62051/z9dmsr59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides insight into the use and impact of criminal reconciliation as an alternative form of criminal procedure in the modern justice system. By allowing the parties to reach an agreement through negotiation under the supervision of the judiciary, criminal conciliation aims to achieve a speedy resolution of criminal cases, reduce the burden on the courts and repair as much damage as possible to the victims. The article first describes the legal basis of criminal reconciliation and its development in different countries, demonstrating the diversity of this procedure and its adaptability across the globe. Subsequently, the article analyses in detail the conditions and procedures applicable to criminal reconciliation, highlighting the various factors that need to be taken into account in its practical operation, including the nature of the case, the will of the parties, and the possible legal consequences. Through case analyses, it reveals the advantages of criminal reconciliation in dealing with certain types of cases, such as the ability to resolve disputes quickly and reduce litigation costs and time. In addition, the article also discusses the limitations and potential risks of criminal settlements, such as the possibility of compromising the fulfilment of justice and the lack of necessary transparency and oversight in some cases. Finally, the article proposes a series of improvements to the criminal settlement process, including strengthening the oversight mechanisms of the process, ensuring the fairness of settlement agreements, and expanding public awareness and understanding of the process. Through comprehensive analyses and discussions, this article aims to provide legal professionals, scholars, and policymakers with a perspective for an in-depth understanding of criminal reconciliation, and to help them assess and improve existing judicial practices so that criminal reconciliation can not only enhance judicial efficiency, but also operate on the basis of ensuring fairness.","PeriodicalId":512428,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","volume":"120 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62051/z9dmsr59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides insight into the use and impact of criminal reconciliation as an alternative form of criminal procedure in the modern justice system. By allowing the parties to reach an agreement through negotiation under the supervision of the judiciary, criminal conciliation aims to achieve a speedy resolution of criminal cases, reduce the burden on the courts and repair as much damage as possible to the victims. The article first describes the legal basis of criminal reconciliation and its development in different countries, demonstrating the diversity of this procedure and its adaptability across the globe. Subsequently, the article analyses in detail the conditions and procedures applicable to criminal reconciliation, highlighting the various factors that need to be taken into account in its practical operation, including the nature of the case, the will of the parties, and the possible legal consequences. Through case analyses, it reveals the advantages of criminal reconciliation in dealing with certain types of cases, such as the ability to resolve disputes quickly and reduce litigation costs and time. In addition, the article also discusses the limitations and potential risks of criminal settlements, such as the possibility of compromising the fulfilment of justice and the lack of necessary transparency and oversight in some cases. Finally, the article proposes a series of improvements to the criminal settlement process, including strengthening the oversight mechanisms of the process, ensuring the fairness of settlement agreements, and expanding public awareness and understanding of the process. Through comprehensive analyses and discussions, this article aims to provide legal professionals, scholars, and policymakers with a perspective for an in-depth understanding of criminal reconciliation, and to help them assess and improve existing judicial practices so that criminal reconciliation can not only enhance judicial efficiency, but also operate on the basis of ensuring fairness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑事调解程序的适用性和法律后果
本文深入探讨了刑事和解作为现代司法系统中一种替代刑事诉讼形式的使用情况及其影响。刑事和解允许当事人在司法机构的监督下通过谈判达成协议,旨在快速解决刑事案件,减轻法院的负担,并尽可能弥补对受害者造成的损害。文章首先介绍了刑事和解的法律基础及其在不同国家的发展情况,展示了这一程序的多样性及其在全球范围内的适应性。随后,文章详细分析了适用于刑事和解的条件和程序,强调了在实际操作中需要考虑的各种因素,包括案件的性质、当事人的意愿以及可能产生的法律后果。文章通过对案例的分析,揭示了刑事和解在处理某些类型案件时的优势,如能够快速解决纠纷,减少诉讼成本和时间。此外,文章还讨论了刑事和解的局限性和潜在风险,如可能影响司法公正的实现,以及在某些情况下缺乏必要的透明度和监督。最后,文章对刑事和解程序提出了一系列改进建议,包括加强程序的监督机制、确保和解协议的公正性、扩大公众对程序的认识和理解等。本文旨在通过全面的分析和论述,为法律专业人士、学者和政策制定者提供一个深入理解刑事和解的视角,帮助他们评估和改进现有的司法实践,使刑事和解既能提高司法效率,又能在确保公正的基础上运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mining Chinese Animation Movie Audience Concern Themes Based on BERTopic and UGC Research on the impact of digital transformation on the high-quality development of enterprises Design of Consumer Confidence Prediction Index Model based on DEGWO Algorithm AIGC empowers research on the communication path of red culture in six places in Liaoning Applicability and legal consequences of the criminal conciliation procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1