Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1002/hkj2.12018
Ping Wu, Kin Ho Steven Ling
{"title":"Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments","authors":"Ping Wu, Kin Ho Steven Ling","doi":"10.1002/hkj2.12018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pneumonia is a leading diagnosis for patients requiring critical care. Prediction of the causal organisms has proved challenging, and antibiotic overuse is a burning issue.This study aimed to compare the results of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN Panel) to standard diagnostic methods and evaluate its potential impact in an intensive care unit (ICU).This is a retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the ICUs with a diagnosis of pneumonia. The agreement between the PN panel results and the standard diagnostic method was analyzed. Actual and potential adjustments of antimicrobials after the PN panel results were reviewed and compared.Two hundred ninety three patients with pneumonia were included. The PN panel identified at least one pathogen in 159 specimens (54.2%), while the standard diagnostic method identified at least one pathogen in 132 specimens (45.0%). Positive percentage agreement between the PN panel and standard‐of‐care culture reached 94%, and negative percentage agreement reached 97%. Among 293 patients, the availability of PN results led to escalation of antimicrobials in 38 (19%) patients and de‐escalation or discontinuation of antimicrobials in 95 (32.4%) patients.This pilot study showed the PN panel could provide accurate results on the causative pathogens and detect resistant bacteria. It could reduce the use of broad‐spectrum antibiotics and overall antibiotic use. If the PN panel could be checked at the emergency department, targeted antibiotics could be administered when the patient arrived at the ICU.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pneumonia is a leading diagnosis for patients requiring critical care. Prediction of the causal organisms has proved challenging, and antibiotic overuse is a burning issue.This study aimed to compare the results of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN Panel) to standard diagnostic methods and evaluate its potential impact in an intensive care unit (ICU).This is a retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the ICUs with a diagnosis of pneumonia. The agreement between the PN panel results and the standard diagnostic method was analyzed. Actual and potential adjustments of antimicrobials after the PN panel results were reviewed and compared.Two hundred ninety three patients with pneumonia were included. The PN panel identified at least one pathogen in 159 specimens (54.2%), while the standard diagnostic method identified at least one pathogen in 132 specimens (45.0%). Positive percentage agreement between the PN panel and standard‐of‐care culture reached 94%, and negative percentage agreement reached 97%. Among 293 patients, the availability of PN results led to escalation of antimicrobials in 38 (19%) patients and de‐escalation or discontinuation of antimicrobials in 95 (32.4%) patients.This pilot study showed the PN panel could provide accurate results on the causative pathogens and detect resistant bacteria. It could reduce the use of broad‐spectrum antibiotics and overall antibiotic use. If the PN panel could be checked at the emergency department, targeted antibiotics could be administered when the patient arrived at the ICU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薄膜阵列肺炎面板与常规诊断方法的比较及其对香港成人重症监护病房的潜在影响和急诊科的潜在作用
肺炎是危重症患者的主要诊断病症。本研究旨在比较 BioFire FilmArray 肺炎面板(PN 面板)与标准诊断方法的结果,并评估其在重症监护病房(ICU)中的潜在影响。这是一项回顾性研究,包括重症监护病房收治的诊断为肺炎的成年患者。研究分析了 PN 小组的结果与标准诊断方法之间的一致性。研究还回顾并比较了根据 PN 面板结果对抗菌药物进行的实际和潜在调整。PN 小组在 159 份标本(54.2%)中至少确定了一种病原体,而标准诊断方法在 132 份标本(45.0%)中至少确定了一种病原体。PN 小组与标准培养方法之间的正比例一致率达到 94%,负比例一致率达到 97%。在 293 名患者中,有 38 名患者(19%)因获得 PN 结果而升级了抗菌药物,95 名患者(32.4%)因获得 PN 结果而降级或停用了抗菌药物。这项试点研究表明,PN 面板可提供致病病原体的准确结果,并能检测出耐药菌,从而减少广谱抗生素的使用和抗生素的总体使用量。如果能在急诊科检查 PN 面板,就能在患者到达重症监护室时使用有针对性的抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical ventilation management and airway pressure release ventilation practice in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey of intensive care unit clinicians in mainland China Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments Questionnaire survey on point‐of‐care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest among emergency physicians in Hong Kong Burnout in emergency physicians in Hong Kong—A cross‐sectional study on its prevalence, associated factors, and impact Factors for predicting 28‐day mortality in older patients with suspected of having sepsis in the emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1