The effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention on promoting physical activity-related behavior in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial based on health center (TRA -BAC)
Mohammad Hossein Delshad, Alireza A Hidarnia, F. Pourhaji
{"title":"The effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention on promoting physical activity-related behavior in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial based on health center (TRA -BAC)","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Delshad, Alireza A Hidarnia, F. Pourhaji","doi":"10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40).Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test.Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p<0.001) and 6-month (p<0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p<0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p<0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p<0.05).Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.","PeriodicalId":510037,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":"67 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40).Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test.Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p<0.001) and 6-month (p<0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p<0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p<0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p<0.05).Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.
目的:本研究旨在评估基于合理行动理论(TRA)的教育计划在促进慢性腰背痛(cLBP)患者体育锻炼(PA)行为方面的有效性。方法:基于合理行动理论的背部护理计划是一项随机对照试验,在一家医疗服务中心进行。该试验比较了 TRA 构建与对照组的有效性。转诊到德黑兰沙希德-贝赫什提医科大学的 80 名患者被随机分配到基于 TRA 的干预组(40 人)或对照组(40 人)。结果显示:"组别 "与 "测试时间 "之间存在显著的交互效应(P0.05),干预组在 3 个月(P<0.001)和 6 个月(P<0.001)的随访中显示出与 PA 相关的行为有显著改善。与对照组(3.2±1.0)相比,干预组的 PA 行为平均得分(8.4±1.1)明显更高(p<0.001)。同样,干预组的疼痛强度(3.8±2.2)明显低于对照组(4.3±3.0)(P<0.001)。此外,干预组的腰椎活动范围测试技能也有明显改善(P<0.05)。结论:通过基于 TRA 框架的针对性教育策略,TRA-BAC 计划有望改善 cLBP 患者的 PA 相关行为并减轻疼痛。