SELF-DEFENSE IN 1904 ON THE PAGES OF THE MAGAZINE “DROSHAK”

Karine Hovsepyan
{"title":"SELF-DEFENSE IN 1904 ON THE PAGES OF THE MAGAZINE “DROSHAK”","authors":"Karine Hovsepyan","doi":"10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The self-defense of Sassoon in 1904 occupies a unique place in the Western Armenian national-liberation struggle. \nThis is one of the unique episodes of the liberation struggle, when the struggle had united, both to all the Hayduks and to the national parties: Hnchakyan, Dashnaktsutyun, despite their obvious differences. The struggle is presented in the article according to \"Droshak\", which reflected the events of those years with the greatest accuracy, because his information was supplemented by the direct participants of that struggle and with letters from leading figures, which were written in the mess of events under new impressions. This fact has great importance, as the memoirs of the liberation figures were written years after the events and many details are left out . “Droshak\"comes to fill that gap. \nIn article is discussed the well-prepared siege of Sassoon by the Turkish government, which presented for many years as a revolt, rather than self-defense. Besides the Turkish government, that point of view was also advanced by the tsarist authorities. However, the fact that rebellions took place in Sassoon in 1894 and 1904 is a falsification of historical events and the birthplace of that falsehood was ottoman court Yltzn. The purpose of the forgery Sassoon's responsibility for the epic events put on the Armenians (Poghosyan S. 1989).","PeriodicalId":516798,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-defense of Sassoon in 1904 occupies a unique place in the Western Armenian national-liberation struggle. This is one of the unique episodes of the liberation struggle, when the struggle had united, both to all the Hayduks and to the national parties: Hnchakyan, Dashnaktsutyun, despite their obvious differences. The struggle is presented in the article according to "Droshak", which reflected the events of those years with the greatest accuracy, because his information was supplemented by the direct participants of that struggle and with letters from leading figures, which were written in the mess of events under new impressions. This fact has great importance, as the memoirs of the liberation figures were written years after the events and many details are left out . “Droshak"comes to fill that gap. In article is discussed the well-prepared siege of Sassoon by the Turkish government, which presented for many years as a revolt, rather than self-defense. Besides the Turkish government, that point of view was also advanced by the tsarist authorities. However, the fact that rebellions took place in Sassoon in 1894 and 1904 is a falsification of historical events and the birthplace of that falsehood was ottoman court Yltzn. The purpose of the forgery Sassoon's responsibility for the epic events put on the Armenians (Poghosyan S. 1989).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1904 年在 "droshak "杂志上发表的自卫声明
1904 年沙逊的自卫在西亚美尼亚民族解放斗争中占有独特的地位。这是解放斗争中独一无二的事件之一,当时的斗争团结了所有海杜克人和各民族党派:尽管存在着明显的分歧,但 Hnchakyan、Dashnaktsutyun 等民族党派还是团结在一起。卓沙克 "在文章中介绍了这场斗争,文章最准确地反映了当年发生的事件,因为他的信息得到了这场斗争的直接参与者和主要人物来信的补充,这些来信是在事件混乱的情况下根据新的印象写成的。这一事实非常重要,因为解放人物的回忆录是在事件发生多年后写的,许多细节都被遗漏了。"卓夏克》的出现填补了这一空白。文章讨论了土耳其政府对沙逊进行的精心准备的围攻,多年来,沙逊一直被当作叛乱,而不是自卫。除了土耳其政府,沙皇当局也提出了这一观点。然而,1894 年和 1904 年在沙逊发生叛乱的事实是对历史事件的篡改,而这一谬论的发源地正是奥斯曼帝国的伊尔岑宫廷。伪造的目的是将沙逊史诗事件的责任推给亚美尼亚人(Poghosyan S. 1989 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE PROBLEMS OF TEACHING THE ADOBE PAGEMAKER SOFTWARE AND THE INCREASE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEARNING BY USING THE COMPARISON METHOD THE STUDY OF THE VOCABULARY IN HOVHANNES TUMANYAN'S POEM “LORETSI SAKON” “CHARENTS’ LAND OF NAIRI AND THE POETICS OF THE CITY IN THE SYMBOLIST NOVEL” STYLISTIC IMPLICATIONS OF USING FOREIGN WORDS IN STORY “THE LOST DOVE” BY NAR-DOS OBSERVATIONS ON ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF HAKOB PARONYAN’S SERIES OF NOVELETTES “HARMS OF POLITENESS”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1