Linking local climate scenarios to global warming levels: applicability, prospects and uncertainties

Benedikt Becsi, Herbert Formayer
{"title":"Linking local climate scenarios to global warming levels: applicability, prospects and uncertainties","authors":"Benedikt Becsi, Herbert Formayer","doi":"10.1088/2752-5295/ad574e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Global warming levels (GWLs) are increasingly becoming a central concept in climate change studies. In recent years, their integrative quality for climate change impact analysis has been demonstrated, and methodological advancements have helped to compensate for some inherent shortfalls of the concept. However, their applicability at the regional level is debatable, and no study to date has examined the possibility of linking local climate scenarios to GWLs. For the case of Austria, we have evaluated the relation between global and local warming patterns, and whether version changes of global climate models could be incorporated into local climate scenarios by means of the GWL concept, without updating the actual data. We applied the time sampling approach, where GWLs are determined as periods when global mean temperature anomalies cross a certain threshold. GWL periods were sampled both from the global models in the background of the local climate scenarios (CMIP5), and from an equivalent ensemble of newer-generation climate models (CMIP6). Uncertainties resulting from sampling GWLs from different global climate model ensembles were examined, and prospects for local climate change impact assessments were discussed. Accounting for updated global climate model versions might be useful when the changes at certain GWLs are related to fixed reference periods, but temperature increments between GWLs remained relatively constant across model versions, even on the local level. The study bridges a significant gap to link regional and local climate projections to GWLs. Climate change impacts assessments that build on those datasets can benefit from the integrative character of GWLs, making studies comparable across multiple disciplines and model versions, and thus fostering a way to communicate local climate change impacts more comprehensible.","PeriodicalId":432508,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Climate","volume":"110 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ad574e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global warming levels (GWLs) are increasingly becoming a central concept in climate change studies. In recent years, their integrative quality for climate change impact analysis has been demonstrated, and methodological advancements have helped to compensate for some inherent shortfalls of the concept. However, their applicability at the regional level is debatable, and no study to date has examined the possibility of linking local climate scenarios to GWLs. For the case of Austria, we have evaluated the relation between global and local warming patterns, and whether version changes of global climate models could be incorporated into local climate scenarios by means of the GWL concept, without updating the actual data. We applied the time sampling approach, where GWLs are determined as periods when global mean temperature anomalies cross a certain threshold. GWL periods were sampled both from the global models in the background of the local climate scenarios (CMIP5), and from an equivalent ensemble of newer-generation climate models (CMIP6). Uncertainties resulting from sampling GWLs from different global climate model ensembles were examined, and prospects for local climate change impact assessments were discussed. Accounting for updated global climate model versions might be useful when the changes at certain GWLs are related to fixed reference periods, but temperature increments between GWLs remained relatively constant across model versions, even on the local level. The study bridges a significant gap to link regional and local climate projections to GWLs. Climate change impacts assessments that build on those datasets can benefit from the integrative character of GWLs, making studies comparable across multiple disciplines and model versions, and thus fostering a way to communicate local climate change impacts more comprehensible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将地方气候假设与全球变暖水平联系起来:适用性、前景和不确定性
全球变暖水平(GWLs)正日益成为气候变化研究的核心概念。近年来,全球升温水平在气候变化影响分析中的综合作用已得到证明,方法上的进步也有助于弥补这一概念的一些固有缺陷。然而,它们在地区层面的适用性还有待商榷,迄今为止,还没有任何研究探讨过将地方气候情景与全球降水清单联系起来的可能性。针对奥地利的情况,我们评估了全球和地方变暖模式之间的关系,以及全球气候模型的版本变化是否可以通过 GWL 概念纳入地方气候情景,而无需更新实际数据。我们采用了时间取样法,将全球平均气温异常值超过一定临界值的时段确定为全球平均气温异常值。全球平均温度阈值时间段的取样既取自本地气候情景背景下的全球模型(CMIP5),也取自新一代气候模型的等效集合(CMIP6)。研究了从不同的全球气候模式集合中抽取 GWLs 所产生的不确定性,并讨论了当地气候变化影响评估的前景。当某些 GWLs 的变化与固定的参照期相关时,考虑更新的全球气候模式版本可能是有用的,但不同模式版本的 GWLs 之间的温度增量保持相对稳定,即使在地方层面也是如此。这项研究弥补了将区域和地方气候预测与全球降雨量线联系起来的重大空白。建立在这些数据集基础上的气候变化影响评估可受益于全球降温潜能值的综合特性,使研究具有跨学科和跨模型版本的可比性,从而促进以更易于理解的方式传播当地气候变化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of decadal predictions of monthly extreme Mei-yu rainfall via a causality guided approach Climate classification systems for validating Earth system models Net evaporation-induced mangrove area loss across low-lying Caribbean islands Using analogues to predict changes in future UK heatwaves Linking local climate scenarios to global warming levels: applicability, prospects and uncertainties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1