Improvement of decadal predictions of monthly extreme Mei-yu rainfall via a causality guided approach

K. Ng, G. Leckebusch, Kevin I. Hodges
{"title":"Improvement of decadal predictions of monthly extreme Mei-yu rainfall via a causality guided approach","authors":"K. Ng, G. Leckebusch, Kevin I. Hodges","doi":"10.1088/2752-5295/ad6631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While the improved performance of climate prediction systems has allowed better predictions of the East Asian Summer Monsoon rainfall to be made, the ability to predict extreme Mei-yu rainfall (MYR) remains a challenge. Given that large scale climate modes (LSCMs) tend to be better predicted by climate prediction systems than local extremes, one useful approach is to employ causality-guided statistical models (CGSMs), which link known LSCMs to improve MYR prediction. However, previous work suggests that CGSMs trained with data from 1979-2018 might struggle to model MYR in the pre-1978 period. One hypothesis is that this is due to potential changes in causal processes, which modulate MYR in different phases of the multidecadal variability, such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). In this study, we explore this hypothesis by constructing CGSMs for different PDO phases, which reflect the different phases of specific causal process, and examine the difference in quality as well as with respect to difference drivers and thus causal links between CGSMs of different PDO phases as well as the non-PDO phase specific CGSMs. Our results show that the set of predictors of CGSMs is PDO phase specific. Furthermore, the performance of PDO phase specific CGSMs are better than the non-PDO phase specific CGSMs. To demonstrate the added value of CGSMs, the PDO phase specific versions are applied to the latest UK Met Office decadal prediction system, DePreSys4, and it is shown that the root-mean squared errors of MYR prediction based on PDO phase specific CGSMs is consistently smaller than the MYR predicted based on the direct DePreSys4 extreme rainfall simulations. We conclude that the use of a causality approach improves the prediction of extreme precipitation based solely on known LSCMs because of the change in the main drivers of extreme rainfall during different PDO-phases.","PeriodicalId":432508,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Climate","volume":"30 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ad6631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the improved performance of climate prediction systems has allowed better predictions of the East Asian Summer Monsoon rainfall to be made, the ability to predict extreme Mei-yu rainfall (MYR) remains a challenge. Given that large scale climate modes (LSCMs) tend to be better predicted by climate prediction systems than local extremes, one useful approach is to employ causality-guided statistical models (CGSMs), which link known LSCMs to improve MYR prediction. However, previous work suggests that CGSMs trained with data from 1979-2018 might struggle to model MYR in the pre-1978 period. One hypothesis is that this is due to potential changes in causal processes, which modulate MYR in different phases of the multidecadal variability, such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). In this study, we explore this hypothesis by constructing CGSMs for different PDO phases, which reflect the different phases of specific causal process, and examine the difference in quality as well as with respect to difference drivers and thus causal links between CGSMs of different PDO phases as well as the non-PDO phase specific CGSMs. Our results show that the set of predictors of CGSMs is PDO phase specific. Furthermore, the performance of PDO phase specific CGSMs are better than the non-PDO phase specific CGSMs. To demonstrate the added value of CGSMs, the PDO phase specific versions are applied to the latest UK Met Office decadal prediction system, DePreSys4, and it is shown that the root-mean squared errors of MYR prediction based on PDO phase specific CGSMs is consistently smaller than the MYR predicted based on the direct DePreSys4 extreme rainfall simulations. We conclude that the use of a causality approach improves the prediction of extreme precipitation based solely on known LSCMs because of the change in the main drivers of extreme rainfall during different PDO-phases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过因果关系引导法改进梅雨月极端降雨量的十年期预测
虽然气候预测系统性能的提高使人们能够更好地预测东亚夏季季风降雨量,但预测极端梅雨降雨量(MYR)的能力仍然是一个挑战。鉴于气候预测系统对大尺度气候模式(LSCMs)的预测往往优于对局部极端气候模式的预测,一种有用的方法是采用因果引导统计模式(CGSMs),将已知的大尺度气候模式联系起来,以改进对梅雨的预测。然而,以前的工作表明,用 1979-2018 年的数据训练的 CGSM 可能难以模拟 1978 年以前的 MYR。一种假设认为,这是由于在太平洋十年涛动(PDO)等多年代变率的不同阶段调节 MYR 的因果过程发生了潜在变化。在本研究中,我们通过构建不同 PDO 阶段的 CGSM(反映特定因果过程的不同阶段)来探索这一假设,并检验了不同 PDO 阶段的 CGSM 和非 PDO 阶段的 CGSM 在质量和驱动因素方面的差异,以及它们之间的因果联系。我们的研究结果表明,CGSM 的预测因子集具有 PDO 阶段性特征。此外,特定于 PDO 阶段的 CGSM 的性能优于非特定于 PDO 阶段的 CGSM。为了证明 CGSMs 的附加值,我们将 PDO 相位特异性版本应用于英国气象局最新的十年期预测系统 DePreSys4,结果表明,基于 PDO 相位特异性 CGSMs 预测的 MYR 均方根误差始终小于基于直接 DePreSys4 极端降雨模拟预测的 MYR。我们的结论是,由于在不同 PDO 阶段极端降雨的主要驱动因素发生了变化,因此使用因果关系方法可以改善仅根据已知 LSCM 预测极端降雨的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of decadal predictions of monthly extreme Mei-yu rainfall via a causality guided approach Climate classification systems for validating Earth system models Net evaporation-induced mangrove area loss across low-lying Caribbean islands Using analogues to predict changes in future UK heatwaves Linking local climate scenarios to global warming levels: applicability, prospects and uncertainties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1