Hybrid Aquila optimizer for efficient classification with probabilistic neural networks

Mohammed Alweshah, Mustafa Alessa, Saleh Alkhalaileh, Sofian Kassaymeh, Bilal Abu-Salih
{"title":"Hybrid Aquila optimizer for efficient classification with probabilistic neural networks","authors":"Mohammed Alweshah, Mustafa Alessa, Saleh Alkhalaileh, Sofian Kassaymeh, Bilal Abu-Salih","doi":"10.3233/mgs-230065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The model of a probabilistic neural network (PNN) is commonly utilized for classification and pattern recognition issues in data mining. An approach frequently used to enhance its effectiveness is the adjustment of PNN classifier parameters through the outcomes of metaheuristic optimization strategies. Since PNN employs a limited set of instructions, metaheuristic algorithms provide an efficient way to modify its parameters. In this study, we have employed the Aquila optimizer algorithm (AO), a contemporary algorithm, to modify PNN parameters. We have proposed two methods: Aquila optimizer based probabilistic neural network (AO-PNN), which uses both local and global search capabilities of AO, and hybrid Aquila optimizer and simulated annealing based probabilistic neural network (AOS-PNN), which integrates the global search abilities of AO with the local search mechanism of simulated annealing (SA). Our experimental results indicate that both AO-PNN and AOS-PNN perform better than the PNN model in terms of accuracy across all datasets. This suggests that they have the potential to generate more precise results when utilized to improve PNN parameters. Moreover, our hybridization technique, AOS-PNN, is more effective than AO-PNN, as evidenced by classification experiments accuracy, data distribution, convergence speed, and significance. We have also compared our suggested approaches with three different methodologies, namely Coronavirus herd immunity optimizer based probabilistic neural network (CHIO-PNN), African buffalo algorithm based probabilistic neural network (ABO-PNN), and β-hill climbing. We have found that AO-PNN and AOS-PNN have achieved significantly higher classification accuracy rates of 90.68 and 93.95, respectively.","PeriodicalId":508072,"journal":{"name":"Multiagent and Grid Systems","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiagent and Grid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/mgs-230065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The model of a probabilistic neural network (PNN) is commonly utilized for classification and pattern recognition issues in data mining. An approach frequently used to enhance its effectiveness is the adjustment of PNN classifier parameters through the outcomes of metaheuristic optimization strategies. Since PNN employs a limited set of instructions, metaheuristic algorithms provide an efficient way to modify its parameters. In this study, we have employed the Aquila optimizer algorithm (AO), a contemporary algorithm, to modify PNN parameters. We have proposed two methods: Aquila optimizer based probabilistic neural network (AO-PNN), which uses both local and global search capabilities of AO, and hybrid Aquila optimizer and simulated annealing based probabilistic neural network (AOS-PNN), which integrates the global search abilities of AO with the local search mechanism of simulated annealing (SA). Our experimental results indicate that both AO-PNN and AOS-PNN perform better than the PNN model in terms of accuracy across all datasets. This suggests that they have the potential to generate more precise results when utilized to improve PNN parameters. Moreover, our hybridization technique, AOS-PNN, is more effective than AO-PNN, as evidenced by classification experiments accuracy, data distribution, convergence speed, and significance. We have also compared our suggested approaches with three different methodologies, namely Coronavirus herd immunity optimizer based probabilistic neural network (CHIO-PNN), African buffalo algorithm based probabilistic neural network (ABO-PNN), and β-hill climbing. We have found that AO-PNN and AOS-PNN have achieved significantly higher classification accuracy rates of 90.68 and 93.95, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用概率神经网络进行高效分类的混合 Aquila 优化器
概率神经网络(PNN)模型通常用于数据挖掘中的分类和模式识别问题。通过元启发式优化策略的结果来调整 PNN 分类器参数是增强其有效性的常用方法。由于 PNN 使用的指令集有限,元启发式算法为修改其参数提供了一种有效的方法。在本研究中,我们采用了当代算法 Aquila optimizer algorithm (AO) 来修改 PNN 参数。我们提出了两种方法:一种是基于 Aquila 优化器的概率神经网络(AO-PNN),它同时使用了 AO 的局部和全局搜索能力;另一种是基于 Aquila 优化器和模拟退火的混合概率神经网络(AOS-PNN),它整合了 AO 的全局搜索能力和模拟退火(SA)的局部搜索机制。我们的实验结果表明,在所有数据集上,AO-PNN 和 AOS-PNN 的准确性都优于 PNN 模型。这表明,当利用它们来改进 PNN 参数时,有可能产生更精确的结果。此外,我们的混合技术 AOS-PNN 比 AO-PNN 更有效,这一点可以从分类实验的准确性、数据分布、收敛速度和显著性等方面得到证明。我们还将建议的方法与三种不同的方法进行了比较,即基于冠状病毒群免疫优化器的概率神经网络(CHIO-PNN)、基于非洲水牛算法的概率神经网络(ABO-PNN)和β-爬山法。我们发现,AO-PNN 和 AOS-PNN 的分类准确率明显更高,分别达到 90.68 和 93.95。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Femur bone volumetric estimation for osteoporosis classification based on deep learning with tuna jellyfish optimization using X-ray images A review on deep learning-based object tracking methods Hybrid Aquila optimizer for efficient classification with probabilistic neural networks An effective approach for reducing data redundancy in multi-agent system communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1