How can the preferences of policy makers be operationalised in optimum control problems with macroeconometric models? A case study for Slovenian fiscal policies

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Public Sector Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.3326/pse.48.2.2
D. Blueschke, K. Weyerstrass, R. Neck
{"title":"How can the preferences of policy makers be operationalised in optimum control problems with macroeconometric models? A case study for Slovenian fiscal policies","authors":"D. Blueschke, K. Weyerstrass, R. Neck","doi":"10.3326/pse.48.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we use the results of a survey among Slovenian politicians in order to design an objective function for an optimal control problem with a macroe-conometric model for fiscal policy in Slovenia that takes account of policy makers’ preferences. The paper discusses three different scenarios in which the policy preferences revealed in interviews can be included in the objective functions of the control problems. These objective functions are then used to calculate optimal fiscal policies for the Slovenian economy until 2030. For this purpose, we utilise the macroeconometric model SLOPOL10 and the OPTCON2 algorithm. The results indicate qualitatively similar behaviour of the optimised dynamic system and a better performance (lower values of the loss due to deviation from “ideal” paths) from a ranking-based approach than from an ad-hoc assumption of policy makers’ preferences. We sketch how to integrate the approach in a decision-sup - port system for macroeconomic policy design.","PeriodicalId":37447,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.48.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we use the results of a survey among Slovenian politicians in order to design an objective function for an optimal control problem with a macroe-conometric model for fiscal policy in Slovenia that takes account of policy makers’ preferences. The paper discusses three different scenarios in which the policy preferences revealed in interviews can be included in the objective functions of the control problems. These objective functions are then used to calculate optimal fiscal policies for the Slovenian economy until 2030. For this purpose, we utilise the macroeconometric model SLOPOL10 and the OPTCON2 algorithm. The results indicate qualitatively similar behaviour of the optimised dynamic system and a better performance (lower values of the loss due to deviation from “ideal” paths) from a ranking-based approach than from an ad-hoc assumption of policy makers’ preferences. We sketch how to integrate the approach in a decision-sup - port system for macroeconomic policy design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在宏观计量经济学模型的最优控制问题中操作决策者的偏好?斯洛文尼亚财政政策案例研究
在本文中,我们利用对斯洛文尼亚政治家的调查结果,为斯洛文尼亚财政政策的宏观经济计量模型设计了一个最优控制问题的目标函数,其中考虑到了决策者的偏好。本文讨论了三种不同的情况,即访谈中揭示的政策偏好可以纳入控制问题的目标函数。然后利用这些目标函数来计算斯洛文尼亚经济在 2030 年前的最优财政政策。为此,我们使用了宏观计量经济学模型 SLOPOL10 和 OPTCON2 算法。结果表明,优化后的动态系统在质量上表现相似,基于排序的方法比决策者偏好的临时假设有更好的表现(偏离 "理想 "路径造成的损失值更低)。我们简要介绍了如何将该方法集成到宏观经济政策设计的决策上位系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Sector Economics
Public Sector Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Sector Economics is double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Institute of Public Finance, which seeks theoretical, empirical and policy-oriented contributions analysing the role and functioning of the public sector at macroeconomic, sectoral and microeconomic levels, in both advanced and emerging market economies. We also aim to provide a professional forum for the discussion of contemporary public policy issues and actively seek survey articles, appraisals of current policy debates, shorter notes and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
How can the preferences of policy makers be operationalised in optimum control problems with macroeconometric models? A case study for Slovenian fiscal policies Perceived unmet healthcare needs among older Europeans in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: the telemedicine solution Is the use of the investment resources allocated to municipalities in Cameroon efficient? Fiscal decentralization and gender equality: empirical evidence across countries Taxpayers' attitudes toward tax compliance in the Slovenian tax system: differences according to gender, income level and size of settlement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1