Anchorage Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Polymer Reinforced Concrete with Palm Kernel Shells as Partial Coarse Aggregate

Francis Ohene-Coffie, Charles K. Kankam, Selase A. K. Kpo, George Oti Boateng, Ezekiel Sackitey Nanor
{"title":"Anchorage Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Polymer Reinforced Concrete with Palm Kernel Shells as Partial Coarse Aggregate","authors":"Francis Ohene-Coffie, Charles K. Kankam, Selase A. K. Kpo, George Oti Boateng, Ezekiel Sackitey Nanor","doi":"10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i71189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the use of GFRP reinforcing bars in place of steel reinforcing bars in concrete structures such as, buildings, roads, and bridges cannot be overlooked as they offer advantages such as higher tensile strength, corrosion resistance, reduced weight and cost effectiveness compared to steel reinforcing bars. The use of PKS as partial coarse aggregate in steel reinforced concrete has been studied by several researchers and found to produce lightweight concrete and reduce construction cost but, the application of GFRP reinforcing bars in LWC such as PKSC, presents a unique structural material with possibly different mechanical and structural properties which requires further studies and this study specifically focused on determining the anchorage bond strength of Glass Fibre Polymer reinforced concrete with PKS as partial coarse aggregate since the bond strength between concrete and reinforcing bars is a crucial prerequisite for the design of  reinforced concrete as a composite material. Normal weight concrete of mix ratio 1:1.5:3 with water-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.5 and lightweight concrete with 10% of the volume of coarse aggregate replaced by PKS were used in a total of forty-eight (48) double pull-out prismatic specimens of dimension 100mm x 100mm x 300mm for control and test specimens respectively, embedded with 12mm and 16mm diameter GFRP reinforcing bars at varying end-to-end embedment lengths (100mm, 125mm and 150mm) and 300mm continuous embedment. Average anchorage bond strength of 4.684N/mm2 and 3.558N/mm2 were respectively recorded for the PKSC with 12mm and 16mm diameter bars and 100mm embedment length and 3.051N/mm2 and 2.899N/mm2 respectively for PKSC specimens with 12mm and 16mm diameter bars and 150mm embedment length, indicating a decrease in anchorage bond strength with increasing (end-to-end) embedment length. However, the highest average anchorage bond strength of 6.174N/mm2 and 4.581N/mm2 were respectively recorded for PKSC specimens with 12mm and 16mm GFRP reinforcing bars and continuous (300mm) embedment length. Comparatively, the average percentage anchorage bond strength values ranging between 75.5-97.9% of that of NWC were recorded for PKSC and an increase in GFRP reinforcing bar diameter resulted in a decrease in anchorage bond strength. Splitting failure was observed for most of the specimens with longitudinal and transverse crack patterns developed after load application regardless of the size of GFRP reinforcing bar or concrete mix but the extent and visibility of the cracks formed reduced in specimens with continuous bar embedment.","PeriodicalId":508164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research and Reports","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i71189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the use of GFRP reinforcing bars in place of steel reinforcing bars in concrete structures such as, buildings, roads, and bridges cannot be overlooked as they offer advantages such as higher tensile strength, corrosion resistance, reduced weight and cost effectiveness compared to steel reinforcing bars. The use of PKS as partial coarse aggregate in steel reinforced concrete has been studied by several researchers and found to produce lightweight concrete and reduce construction cost but, the application of GFRP reinforcing bars in LWC such as PKSC, presents a unique structural material with possibly different mechanical and structural properties which requires further studies and this study specifically focused on determining the anchorage bond strength of Glass Fibre Polymer reinforced concrete with PKS as partial coarse aggregate since the bond strength between concrete and reinforcing bars is a crucial prerequisite for the design of  reinforced concrete as a composite material. Normal weight concrete of mix ratio 1:1.5:3 with water-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.5 and lightweight concrete with 10% of the volume of coarse aggregate replaced by PKS were used in a total of forty-eight (48) double pull-out prismatic specimens of dimension 100mm x 100mm x 300mm for control and test specimens respectively, embedded with 12mm and 16mm diameter GFRP reinforcing bars at varying end-to-end embedment lengths (100mm, 125mm and 150mm) and 300mm continuous embedment. Average anchorage bond strength of 4.684N/mm2 and 3.558N/mm2 were respectively recorded for the PKSC with 12mm and 16mm diameter bars and 100mm embedment length and 3.051N/mm2 and 2.899N/mm2 respectively for PKSC specimens with 12mm and 16mm diameter bars and 150mm embedment length, indicating a decrease in anchorage bond strength with increasing (end-to-end) embedment length. However, the highest average anchorage bond strength of 6.174N/mm2 and 4.581N/mm2 were respectively recorded for PKSC specimens with 12mm and 16mm GFRP reinforcing bars and continuous (300mm) embedment length. Comparatively, the average percentage anchorage bond strength values ranging between 75.5-97.9% of that of NWC were recorded for PKSC and an increase in GFRP reinforcing bar diameter resulted in a decrease in anchorage bond strength. Splitting failure was observed for most of the specimens with longitudinal and transverse crack patterns developed after load application regardless of the size of GFRP reinforcing bar or concrete mix but the extent and visibility of the cracks formed reduced in specimens with continuous bar embedment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用棕榈仁壳作为部分粗骨料的玻纤聚合物加固混凝土的锚固粘结强度
近年来,在建筑、道路和桥梁等混凝土结构中使用 GFRP 钢筋代替钢筋的做法不容忽视,因为与钢筋相比,GFRP 钢筋具有抗拉强度高、耐腐蚀、重量轻和成本效益高等优点。一些研究人员已经对在钢筋混凝土中使用 PKS 作为部分粗骨料进行了研究,发现它可以生产轻质混凝土并降低建筑成本,但是,在 PKSC 等轻质混凝土中应用玻璃纤维增强塑料钢筋,会产生一种独特的结构材料,其机械和结构特性可能会有所不同,这就需要进一步研究,本研究特别侧重于确定使用 PKS 作为部分粗骨料的玻璃纤维增强塑料混凝土的锚固粘结强度,因为混凝土和钢筋之间的粘结强度是钢筋混凝土作为复合材料进行设计的重要前提。我们使用混合比为 1:1.5:3、水灰比(w/c)为 0.5 的常重混凝土,以及用 PKS 替代 10%粗骨料的轻质混凝土,分别制作了 48 个尺寸为 100 毫米 x 100 毫米 x 300 毫米的双拉出棱柱试样(对照试样和试验试样),并在试样中嵌入了直径为 12 毫米和 16 毫米的 GFRP 钢筋,其端对端嵌入长度(100 毫米、125 毫米和 150 毫米)和连续嵌入长度(300 毫米)各不相同。使用直径 12 毫米和 16 毫米钢筋、嵌入长度为 100 毫米的 PKSC 试样的平均锚固粘结强度分别为 4.684N/mm2 和 3.558N/mm2,而使用直径 12 毫米和 16 毫米钢筋、嵌入长度为 150 毫米的 PKSC 试样的平均锚固粘结强度分别为 3.051N/mm2 和 2.899N/mm2,这表明随着(端到端)嵌入长度的增加,锚固粘结强度有所降低。然而,使用 12 毫米和 16 毫米 GFRP 钢筋、嵌入长度为 300 毫米的 PKSC 试样的平均锚固粘结强度最高,分别为 6.174N/mm2 和 4.581N/mm2。相比之下,PKSC 的平均锚固粘结强度百分比值介于 75.5-97.9% 和 NWC 之间,GFRP 钢筋直径的增加导致锚固粘结强度的降低。无论 GFRP 钢筋的尺寸或混凝土混合料的大小如何,大多数试样在施加荷载后都会出现纵向和横向裂纹,从而导致劈裂破坏,但在连续埋入钢筋的试样中,裂纹的范围和可见度都有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resilience and Recovery Mechanisms for Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Cloud Networks Experimental Multi-dimensional Study on Corrosion Resistance of Inorganic Phosphate Coatings on 17-4PH Stainless Steel Modelling and Optimization of a Brewery Plant from Starch Sources using Aspen Plus Innovations in Thermal Management Techniques for Enhanced Performance and Reliability in Engineering Applications Development Status and Outlook of Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1