Does Income Inequality Matter in Nexus of Green Finance and Environmental Quality? An SEM Analysis Approach

Abdul Salam Maftoon, W. Shaheen, Kiran Afzal, Abdul Razzaq
{"title":"Does Income Inequality Matter in Nexus of Green Finance and Environmental Quality? An SEM Analysis Approach","authors":"Abdul Salam Maftoon, W. Shaheen, Kiran Afzal, Abdul Razzaq","doi":"10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used the Structural Equation Modeling approach to investigate the relationships among Green Finance, Renewable Energy Consumption, Ecological Footprint, and Income Inequality. Data from the years 2001 to 2022 of a total of 126 countries globally were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling approach. The objective was to examine the impact of Green Finance on Ecological directly and through mediation of Income Inequality indirectly. This study’s results demonstrate crucial links that exist between sustainable finance, environmental sustainability, and socioeconomic inequalities. These results point towards the importance of socioeconomic development for these factors. Moreover, Green Finance exhibited potential for alleviating the Ecological Footprint syndrome, and Renewable Energy induced differential effects on ecological degradation as well as Income Inequality. Economic Development and Urbanization as control variables have significant and insignificant positive effect respectively on Ecological Footprint. The policy recommendations as proposed covered a range of strategies for dealing with environmental and social issues. This will involve promoting green finance ventures, enabling renewable energy infrastructure expenditures and investments, supporting sustainable urbanization measures, as well as enhancing public awareness of the interdependence between environmental and social factors. Incorporating these suggestions into policy frameworks would mean stakeholders could contribute towards achieving harmony in terms of environmental sustainability and socioeconomic equity.","PeriodicalId":498180,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal for Societal Issues","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal for Societal Issues","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used the Structural Equation Modeling approach to investigate the relationships among Green Finance, Renewable Energy Consumption, Ecological Footprint, and Income Inequality. Data from the years 2001 to 2022 of a total of 126 countries globally were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling approach. The objective was to examine the impact of Green Finance on Ecological directly and through mediation of Income Inequality indirectly. This study’s results demonstrate crucial links that exist between sustainable finance, environmental sustainability, and socioeconomic inequalities. These results point towards the importance of socioeconomic development for these factors. Moreover, Green Finance exhibited potential for alleviating the Ecological Footprint syndrome, and Renewable Energy induced differential effects on ecological degradation as well as Income Inequality. Economic Development and Urbanization as control variables have significant and insignificant positive effect respectively on Ecological Footprint. The policy recommendations as proposed covered a range of strategies for dealing with environmental and social issues. This will involve promoting green finance ventures, enabling renewable energy infrastructure expenditures and investments, supporting sustainable urbanization measures, as well as enhancing public awareness of the interdependence between environmental and social factors. Incorporating these suggestions into policy frameworks would mean stakeholders could contribute towards achieving harmony in terms of environmental sustainability and socioeconomic equity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入不平等在绿色金融与环境质量的关系中是否重要?一种 SEM 分析方法
本研究采用结构方程建模法研究绿色金融、可再生能源消费、生态足迹和收入不平等之间的关系。研究采用结构方程建模法分析了 2001 年至 2022 年全球共 126 个国家的数据。目的是研究绿色金融对生态环境的直接影响,以及通过调解收入不平等对生态环境的间接影响。研究结果表明,可持续金融、环境可持续性和社会经济不平等之间存在重要联系。这些结果表明了社会经济发展对这些因素的重要性。此外,绿色金融在缓解生态足迹综合症方面表现出了潜力,而可再生能源则对生态退化和收入不平等产生了不同的影响。作为控制变量的经济发展和城市化分别对生态足迹有显著和不显著的积极影响。提出的政策建议涵盖了一系列应对环境和社会问题的战略。这将涉及促进绿色金融企业、促进可再生能源基础设施的支出和投资、支持可持续城市化措施,以及提高公众对环境和社会因素之间相互依存关系的认识。将这些建议纳入政策框架将意味着利益攸关方可以为实现环境可持续性和社会经济公平方面的和谐做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversified Workforce and Employees' Performance: Moderating Effect of Bureaucratic Leadership in Third Sector China's Growing Interest in the Middle East: Implications for US Role Impact of Stress on the Academic Performance of University Students Examining the Impact of Pakistan-China Energy Collaborations on Poverty Reduction in Pakistan Does Income Inequality Matter in Nexus of Green Finance and Environmental Quality? An SEM Analysis Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1