Exploring Facilitator and Student Conversations Within Check-In/Check-Out Intervention: A Systematic Review With Links to Trauma-Informed Conversations

Aimee J. Hackney, Sara Sanders, Kristine Jolivette, N. Swoszowski, R. Ennis
{"title":"Exploring Facilitator and Student Conversations Within Check-In/Check-Out Intervention: A Systematic Review With Links to Trauma-Informed Conversations","authors":"Aimee J. Hackney, Sara Sanders, Kristine Jolivette, N. Swoszowski, R. Ennis","doi":"10.1177/01987429241256319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the current check-in, check-out (CICO) literature base for inclusions of trauma-informed adaptations, specifically within the conversations occurring between CICO facilitators and students. Published studies and dissertations incorporating at least four of the five steps in the CICO intervention and where the same adult served as CICO facilitator in both the check-in and check-out conversations were included. The PRISMA search protocols were followed to identify 36 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Each of the 36 included studies was analyzed to identify study characteristics and settings, intervention adaptations, CICO facilitator nomination and training, and method for selecting daily goals. Micro-coding was used to analyze consistent features and trauma-informed aspects of check-in and check-out conversations across studies. After analyses, findings included lack of specificity on facilitator conversation aspects and no consensus of what such conversations should look like. Future directions for researchers are provided including strengthening CICO conversations to include trauma-informed and relationship-building practices to address specificity and quality of the conversations.","PeriodicalId":505392,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"313 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429241256319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the current check-in, check-out (CICO) literature base for inclusions of trauma-informed adaptations, specifically within the conversations occurring between CICO facilitators and students. Published studies and dissertations incorporating at least four of the five steps in the CICO intervention and where the same adult served as CICO facilitator in both the check-in and check-out conversations were included. The PRISMA search protocols were followed to identify 36 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Each of the 36 included studies was analyzed to identify study characteristics and settings, intervention adaptations, CICO facilitator nomination and training, and method for selecting daily goals. Micro-coding was used to analyze consistent features and trauma-informed aspects of check-in and check-out conversations across studies. After analyses, findings included lack of specificity on facilitator conversation aspects and no consensus of what such conversations should look like. Future directions for researchers are provided including strengthening CICO conversations to include trauma-informed and relationship-building practices to address specificity and quality of the conversations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在签到/签退干预中探索引导者与学生的对话:与创伤知情对话相关的系统回顾
本系统性综述的目的是研究当前签到和签退(CICO)的文献基础,特别是在 CICO 促进者和学生之间的对话中是否包含了以创伤为基础的调整。已发表的研究和论文中至少包含了 CICO 干预五个步骤中的四个步骤,并且在签到和签退对话中均由同一成人担任 CICO 主持人。按照 PRISMA 搜索协议确定了 36 项符合纳入标准的研究。对纳入的 36 项研究中的每一项进行分析,以确定研究特点和环境、干预调整、CICO 主持人提名和培训以及选择每日目标的方法。研究人员使用微观编码来分析各项研究中签到和签退对话的一致特征和创伤知情方面。分析结果表明,研究人员对促进者对话的各个方面缺乏具体的了解,对此类对话应该是什么样子也没有达成共识。为研究人员提供了未来的研究方向,包括加强 CICO 对话,使其包括创伤知情和关系建设实践,以解决对话的具体性和质量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Facilitator and Student Conversations Within Check-In/Check-Out Intervention: A Systematic Review With Links to Trauma-Informed Conversations Knowledge, Application, and Self-Efficacy in Implementing Behavior Management Strategies: A Brief Report on Preliminary Findings From Secondary Data Knowledge, Application, and Self-Efficacy in Implementing Behavior Management Strategies: A Brief Report on Preliminary Findings From Secondary Data Evaluating the Clinical Utility of the MAYSI-2 Among African American Male Juvenile Offenders Evaluating the Clinical Utility of the MAYSI-2 Among African American Male Juvenile Offenders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1