Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Romani Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.3828/rost.2024.6
Victoria Shmidt, Christopher R. Donohue
{"title":"Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe","authors":"Victoria Shmidt, Christopher R. Donohue","doi":"10.3828/rost.2024.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we challenge the idea that the development and the dissemination of scientific knowledge about Roma can be understood as “Eastern” or “Western.” Instead, we argue that the classical division between “science” and “pseudoscience” has the potential to fuel scientific racism and political and social exclusion across the globe. We narrate, for the first time, the role of sociobiology in the development of Roma “race science,” highlighting the ways in which its networks are developed and maintained. These specific mechanisms underlying the production of knowledge and its social and ideological effects may have further applications, such as the spread of mis- and dis-information. Our intent is to examine the attempts to deconstruct sociobiology and its application to Roma, by focusing on the effect of selective awareness among critics of sociobiology, which inevitably leads to the use of epistemic filters and heightens the risk of producing epistemic injustice.\n \n This article was published open access under a CC BY licence:\n https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0\n .\n","PeriodicalId":52533,"journal":{"name":"Romani Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romani Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/rost.2024.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we challenge the idea that the development and the dissemination of scientific knowledge about Roma can be understood as “Eastern” or “Western.” Instead, we argue that the classical division between “science” and “pseudoscience” has the potential to fuel scientific racism and political and social exclusion across the globe. We narrate, for the first time, the role of sociobiology in the development of Roma “race science,” highlighting the ways in which its networks are developed and maintained. These specific mechanisms underlying the production of knowledge and its social and ideological effects may have further applications, such as the spread of mis- and dis-information. Our intent is to examine the attempts to deconstruct sociobiology and its application to Roma, by focusing on the effect of selective awareness among critics of sociobiology, which inevitably leads to the use of epistemic filters and heightens the risk of producing epistemic injustice. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可战胜的种族主义?针对中欧和东欧罗姆人的基因论据的滥用
在本文中,我们对关于罗姆人的科学知识的发展和传播可以被理解为 "东方 "或 "西方 "的观点提出质疑。相反,我们认为,"科学 "与 "伪科学 "之间的经典划分有可能在全球范围内助长科学种族主义以及政治和社会排斥。我们首次叙述了社会生物学在罗姆人 "种族科学 "发展中的作用,强调了其网络发展和维持的方式。这些知识生产的具体机制及其社会和意识形态影响可能会有更多的应用,如错误信息和虚假信息的传播。我们的目的是通过关注社会生物学批评者选择性意识的影响,审视解构社会生物学的尝试及其在罗姆人身上的应用,这种选择性意识不可避免地导致使用认识论过滤器,并增加了产生认识论不公正的风险。 本文以 CC BY 许可方式公开发表:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romani Studies
Romani Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Founded in 1888, the Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society was published in four series up to 1982. In 2000, the journal became Romani Studies. On behalf of the Gypsy Lore Society, Romani Studies features articles on many different communities which, regardless of their origins and self-appellations in various languages, have been referred to in English as Gypsies. These communities include the descendants of migrants from the Indian subcontinent which have been considered as falling into three large subdivisions, Dom, Lom, and Rom. The field has also included communities of other origins which practice, or in the past have practiced, a specific type of service nomadism. The journal publishes articles in history, anthropology, ethnography, sociology, linguistics, art, literature, folklore and music, as well as reviews of books and audiovisual materials.
期刊最新文献
Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe Editorial: Epistemologies in Romani studies: Moving beyond othering otherness Fashion and pilgrimage: Discourses constructing Romani identity Discursive subjugation and the ways out: Narratives of othering among Czech Roma mothers Romani American history: Historical absences and their consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1