“We Have Been Saying This for Thirty Years!”: Exploring Discursive Technologies of Disappearing African Feminist Knowledges

Jane Bennett
{"title":"“We Have Been Saying This for Thirty Years!”: Exploring Discursive Technologies of Disappearing African Feminist Knowledges","authors":"Jane Bennett","doi":"10.25159/2957-3645/12778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most difficult challenges facing African feminist knowledge production on gendered and sexual violence is its persistent erasure. Despite decades of rich, complex, multimodal and wide-ranging discourse on the meanings of gendered and sexual violence in contexts embedded in colonial legacies of racist and class-based systems, ideas as ordinary to African feminist activism as “rape is not sex; rape is violence” (a mantra of early Rape Crisis teaching in the late 1970s) get systematically “disappeared” by what Gqola calls “rape as a language”. In this article, I explore some of the agnotological technologies at work in disappearing key understandings of gendered and sexual violence, understandings developed through feminist activisms and research. The South African context informs the thinking, which entails rigorous concern with theorisations of gendered and sexual violence rooted in historical and contemporary discussions of race and racialisation. A key difference between Northern-oriented and Southern grapples with questions of gendered and sexual violence lies in Southern integrity regarding the death grip of colonialities and the concomitant epistemological imperative of revolution against these. In the article, I work with a group of participants based in the highly public and effective Western Cape Network on Violence Against Women together with a particular instance of gendered violence against women (Enhle Mbali’s accusation of domestic violence against Black Coffee, in 2021) where it is possible to watch the recirculation of ideas long debunked by African feminist activism. I argue for an approach to knowledge creation alert to the politics of “disappearance\".","PeriodicalId":517259,"journal":{"name":"Social and Health Sciences","volume":"182 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/12778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most difficult challenges facing African feminist knowledge production on gendered and sexual violence is its persistent erasure. Despite decades of rich, complex, multimodal and wide-ranging discourse on the meanings of gendered and sexual violence in contexts embedded in colonial legacies of racist and class-based systems, ideas as ordinary to African feminist activism as “rape is not sex; rape is violence” (a mantra of early Rape Crisis teaching in the late 1970s) get systematically “disappeared” by what Gqola calls “rape as a language”. In this article, I explore some of the agnotological technologies at work in disappearing key understandings of gendered and sexual violence, understandings developed through feminist activisms and research. The South African context informs the thinking, which entails rigorous concern with theorisations of gendered and sexual violence rooted in historical and contemporary discussions of race and racialisation. A key difference between Northern-oriented and Southern grapples with questions of gendered and sexual violence lies in Southern integrity regarding the death grip of colonialities and the concomitant epistemological imperative of revolution against these. In the article, I work with a group of participants based in the highly public and effective Western Cape Network on Violence Against Women together with a particular instance of gendered violence against women (Enhle Mbali’s accusation of domestic violence against Black Coffee, in 2021) where it is possible to watch the recirculation of ideas long debunked by African feminist activism. I argue for an approach to knowledge creation alert to the politics of “disappearance".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们已经说了三十年了!":探索消失的非洲女权知识的话语技术
非洲女权主义者关于性别暴力和性暴力的知识生产所面临的最严峻挑战之一就是对其的持续抹杀。尽管数十年来,在种族主义和阶级制度的殖民遗产背景下,对性别暴力和性暴力的含义进行了丰富、复杂、多模态和广泛的讨论,但像 "强奸不是性;强奸是暴力"(20 世纪 70 年代末早期强奸危机教学的口头禅)这样对非洲女权运动来说再普通不过的观点,却被格科拉(Gqola)所说的 "强奸作为一种语言 "系统地 "消失 "了。在这篇文章中,我探讨了一些在消失对性别暴力和性暴力的关键理解时起作用的概念学技术,这些理解是通过女权主义活动和研究形成的。南非的背景为我们的思考提供了信息,它要求我们严格关注植根于种族和种族化的历史和当代讨论中的性别暴力和性暴力理论。北方与南方在性别暴力和性暴力问题上的主要区别在于,南方对殖民主义牢牢掌控的完整性,以及随之而来的对殖民主义进行革命的认识论必要性。在这篇文章中,我与西开普暴力侵害妇女问题网络(Western Cape Network on Violence Against Women)中的一群参与者合作,共同探讨了性别暴力侵害妇女的一个特殊案例(2021 年,恩赫勒-姆巴里(Enhle Mbali)指控黑咖啡(Black Coffee)实施家庭暴力),在这一案例中,我们可以看到非洲女权运动长期以来被驳斥的观点在重新传播。我主张采用一种对 "消失 "政治保持警惕的知识创造方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Researching Violence, Researching Ourselves: Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence “We Have Been Saying This for Thirty Years!”: Exploring Discursive Technologies of Disappearing African Feminist Knowledges Two-Way Learning: A Model for Decolonising Feminist Leadership and Advocacy Rekindling Tradition in a Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of the Use of Traditional Herbal Mixtures Among High-Risk Groups During the Early Outbreak of COVID-19 in the South-South Region of Nigeria Challenging Heteropatriarchy: The Contribution of Visual Activism to a South African Lesbian Standpoint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1