Researching Violence, Researching Ourselves: Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence

Aphiwe Mhlangulana, Caron Zimri, Khanyi Thusi, Tumi Mpofu, Lesedi Mosime, Jude Daya, Skye Chirape, Kajal Carr, F. Boonzaier, Yuri Behari-Leak
{"title":"Researching Violence, Researching Ourselves: Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence","authors":"Aphiwe Mhlangulana, Caron Zimri, Khanyi Thusi, Tumi Mpofu, Lesedi Mosime, Jude Daya, Skye Chirape, Kajal Carr, F. Boonzaier, Yuri Behari-Leak","doi":"10.25159/2957-3645/12038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The colonial nature in which academia has taken shape has meant that its practices of acquiring and producing knowledge are often violent towards those affected by sexual and gender-based violence. Shifting the praxis of how knowledge is understood and engaged in, means critiquing these traditionally colonial methods, as well as identifying new ways of engaging with academia and the framework of conducting research. Contributors of the Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence Project have undertaken this idea in their individual and collaborative work as a way to challenge, disrupt and change the sometimes violent nature of research on sexual and gender-based violence. These contributors believe that there is a responsibility for producing knowledge that is respectful and which contributes towards the goals of care, ethical engagement and social justice, from the inception of the research work through to its dissemination. In this article, we look at their reflections on what unsettling knowledge means for them as they simultaneously navigate and resist colonial structures within which their work still takes place. They describe their journeys within this unsettling and decolonial framing and how they try to enact it in their work on sexual and gender-based violence.\n ","PeriodicalId":517259,"journal":{"name":"Social and Health Sciences","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/12038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The colonial nature in which academia has taken shape has meant that its practices of acquiring and producing knowledge are often violent towards those affected by sexual and gender-based violence. Shifting the praxis of how knowledge is understood and engaged in, means critiquing these traditionally colonial methods, as well as identifying new ways of engaging with academia and the framework of conducting research. Contributors of the Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence Project have undertaken this idea in their individual and collaborative work as a way to challenge, disrupt and change the sometimes violent nature of research on sexual and gender-based violence. These contributors believe that there is a responsibility for producing knowledge that is respectful and which contributes towards the goals of care, ethical engagement and social justice, from the inception of the research work through to its dissemination. In this article, we look at their reflections on what unsettling knowledge means for them as they simultaneously navigate and resist colonial structures within which their work still takes place. They describe their journeys within this unsettling and decolonial framing and how they try to enact it in their work on sexual and gender-based violence.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究暴力,研究我们自己:颠覆关于性别暴力和性暴力的知识生产
学术界形成的殖民地性质意味着,其获取和生产知识的做法往往对那些受性暴力和性别暴力影响的人具有暴力性。转变对知识的理解和参与方式,意味着要批判这些传统的殖民方法,并确定参与学术界和研究框架的新方式。关于性别暴力和性暴力的颠覆性知识生产项目 "的贡献者们在其个人和合作工作中秉承了这一理念,以此来挑战、扰乱和改变关于性暴力和性别暴力的研究有时具有的暴力性质。这些贡献者认为,从研究工作的开始到传播,都有责任创造出尊重他人的知识,为实现关爱、道德参与和社会正义的目标做出贡献。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨他们对 "颠覆性知识 "的反思,因为他们的工作仍在殖民结构中进行,他们同时也在探索和抵制殖民结构。他们描述了自己在这一令人不安的非殖民化框架内的历程,以及他们如何在有关性暴力和性别暴力的工作中贯彻这一框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Researching Violence, Researching Ourselves: Unsettling Knowledge Production on Gendered and Sexual Violence “We Have Been Saying This for Thirty Years!”: Exploring Discursive Technologies of Disappearing African Feminist Knowledges Two-Way Learning: A Model for Decolonising Feminist Leadership and Advocacy Rekindling Tradition in a Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of the Use of Traditional Herbal Mixtures Among High-Risk Groups During the Early Outbreak of COVID-19 in the South-South Region of Nigeria Challenging Heteropatriarchy: The Contribution of Visual Activism to a South African Lesbian Standpoint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1