Melissa M Rames, Elliott Campbell, Eucabeth Asamoah, Thomas Trischman, Anagha Bangalore Kumar, Nahid Y Vidal, Addison Demer
{"title":"Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Invasive Melanoma Allows for Tissue Preservation Compared With Wide Local Excision: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Melissa M Rames, Elliott Campbell, Eucabeth Asamoah, Thomas Trischman, Anagha Bangalore Kumar, Nahid Y Vidal, Addison Demer","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of immunohistochemistry-assisted Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for superficially invasive melanoma, there is a paucity of the literature investigating its effect on final defect size.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the tissue sparing effect of MMS for melanoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three hundred and twenty-eight patients with early-stage (T1a/T1b) cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS from January 2008 to December 2018 were evaluated. Measured defect sizes after Mohs tumor extirpation were compared with anticipated defect size that would result from standard-margin wide local excision (WLE). Average actual versus anticipated defect areas were compared using a paired t -test (95% confidence intervals).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following groups demonstrated a significantly smaller defect area for MMS-treated tumors when compared with anticipated standard-margin WLE defect: All tumors combined (13.8 cm 2 vs 10.4 cm 2 , p < .001), tumors requiring 1 stage (13.6 cm 2 vs 10.1 cm 2,p < .001), and tumors requiring 2 stages (13.2 cm 2 vs 10.5 cm 2 , p = .004). The majority of patients (83.5%, n = 274) achieved clear margins with 1 stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunohistochemistry-assisted MMS for early-stage invasive melanoma is associated with smaller final defect size and overall tissue sparing effect compared with standard WLE margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"997-999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of immunohistochemistry-assisted Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for superficially invasive melanoma, there is a paucity of the literature investigating its effect on final defect size.
Objective: To evaluate the tissue sparing effect of MMS for melanoma.
Materials and methods: Three hundred and twenty-eight patients with early-stage (T1a/T1b) cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS from January 2008 to December 2018 were evaluated. Measured defect sizes after Mohs tumor extirpation were compared with anticipated defect size that would result from standard-margin wide local excision (WLE). Average actual versus anticipated defect areas were compared using a paired t -test (95% confidence intervals).
Results: The following groups demonstrated a significantly smaller defect area for MMS-treated tumors when compared with anticipated standard-margin WLE defect: All tumors combined (13.8 cm 2 vs 10.4 cm 2 , p < .001), tumors requiring 1 stage (13.6 cm 2 vs 10.1 cm 2,p < .001), and tumors requiring 2 stages (13.2 cm 2 vs 10.5 cm 2 , p = .004). The majority of patients (83.5%, n = 274) achieved clear margins with 1 stage.
Conclusion: Immunohistochemistry-assisted MMS for early-stage invasive melanoma is associated with smaller final defect size and overall tissue sparing effect compared with standard WLE margins.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.