{"title":"Intralesional Insulin is Superior to Intralesional Botulinum Toxin-A in the Treatment of Keloids.","authors":"Mona Elradi, Heba Selim, Dina E Hamed","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Keloids represent a troublesome condition that lacks a proper standard management protocol. Insulin and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) both have evidence-based anti-scarring effects. Hence, their role in treating keloids needs to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare insulin's efficacy versus BTX-A in treating keloids.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients with keloids were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Group A was treated with intralesional insulin, Group B with intralesional BTX-A, and Group C with intralesional corticosteroids, each for 4 monthly sessions. The results were assessed objectively and subjectively using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 groups showed a statistically significant reduction in volume before and after therapy, with percent changes of 66.6%, 25.3%, and 75% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Insulin and corticosteroids were statistically superior to BTX-A in improving pigmentation, reducing thickness, and inducing relief in treated keloids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both insulin and BTX-A show a promising role in managing keloids, with insulin demonstrating better efficacy. Botulinum toxin A is better recommended as an adjuvant therapy alongside other mainstay treatment modalities. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm their roles and establish guidelines for their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Keloids represent a troublesome condition that lacks a proper standard management protocol. Insulin and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) both have evidence-based anti-scarring effects. Hence, their role in treating keloids needs to be investigated.
Objective: To compare insulin's efficacy versus BTX-A in treating keloids.
Patients and methods: Sixty-three patients with keloids were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Group A was treated with intralesional insulin, Group B with intralesional BTX-A, and Group C with intralesional corticosteroids, each for 4 monthly sessions. The results were assessed objectively and subjectively using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.
Results: All 3 groups showed a statistically significant reduction in volume before and after therapy, with percent changes of 66.6%, 25.3%, and 75% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Insulin and corticosteroids were statistically superior to BTX-A in improving pigmentation, reducing thickness, and inducing relief in treated keloids.
Conclusion: Both insulin and BTX-A show a promising role in managing keloids, with insulin demonstrating better efficacy. Botulinum toxin A is better recommended as an adjuvant therapy alongside other mainstay treatment modalities. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm their roles and establish guidelines for their use.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.