Intralesional Insulin Is Superior to Intralesional Botulinum Toxin-A in the Treatment of Keloids.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004566
Mona Elradi, Heba Selim, Dina E Hamed
{"title":"Intralesional Insulin Is Superior to Intralesional Botulinum Toxin-A in the Treatment of Keloids.","authors":"Mona Elradi, Heba Selim, Dina E Hamed","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Keloids represent a troublesome condition that lacks a proper standard management protocol. Insulin and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) both have evidence-based anti-scarring effects. Hence, their role in treating keloids needs to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare insulin's efficacy versus BTX-A in treating keloids.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients with keloids were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Group A was treated with intralesional insulin, Group B with intralesional BTX-A, and Group C with intralesional corticosteroids, each for 4 monthly sessions. The results were assessed objectively and subjectively using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 groups showed a statistically significant reduction in volume before and after therapy, with percent changes of 66.6%, 25.3%, and 75% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Insulin and corticosteroids were statistically superior to BTX-A in improving pigmentation, reducing thickness, and inducing relief in treated keloids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both insulin and BTX-A show a promising role in managing keloids, with insulin demonstrating better efficacy. Botulinum toxin A is better recommended as an adjuvant therapy alongside other mainstay treatment modalities. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm their roles and establish guidelines for their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"593-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Keloids represent a troublesome condition that lacks a proper standard management protocol. Insulin and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) both have evidence-based anti-scarring effects. Hence, their role in treating keloids needs to be investigated.

Objective: To compare insulin's efficacy versus BTX-A in treating keloids.

Patients and methods: Sixty-three patients with keloids were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Group A was treated with intralesional insulin, Group B with intralesional BTX-A, and Group C with intralesional corticosteroids, each for 4 monthly sessions. The results were assessed objectively and subjectively using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.

Results: All 3 groups showed a statistically significant reduction in volume before and after therapy, with percent changes of 66.6%, 25.3%, and 75% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Insulin and corticosteroids were statistically superior to BTX-A in improving pigmentation, reducing thickness, and inducing relief in treated keloids.

Conclusion: Both insulin and BTX-A show a promising role in managing keloids, with insulin demonstrating better efficacy. Botulinum toxin A is better recommended as an adjuvant therapy alongside other mainstay treatment modalities. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm their roles and establish guidelines for their use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病灶内胰岛素治疗瘢痕疙瘩优于病灶内肉毒毒素a。
背景:瘢痕疙瘩是一种麻烦的疾病,缺乏适当的标准治疗方案。胰岛素和肉毒毒素A (BTX-A)都有抗疤痕作用。因此,需要研究它们在治疗瘢痕疙瘩中的作用。目的:比较胰岛素与BTX-A治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效。患者与方法:63例瘢痕疙瘩患者随机分为3组。A组局部注射胰岛素,B组局部注射BTX-A, C组局部注射皮质类固醇,每个疗程4个月。采用患者和观察者疤痕评定量表对结果进行客观和主观评价。结果:3组患者治疗前后体积减小均有统计学意义,a、B、C组患者体积减小率分别为66.6%、25.3%、75%。胰岛素和皮质类固醇在改善色素沉着、减少厚度和缓解治疗后的瘢痕疙瘩方面在统计学上优于BTX-A。结论:胰岛素和BTX-A在瘢痕疙瘩治疗中均有良好的作用,其中胰岛素疗效更好。肉毒杆菌毒素A更好地被推荐作为辅助治疗与其他主要治疗方式。需要更大规模的研究来确认它们的作用并为它们的使用制定指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Vehicle Window Type and Film Application on Ultraviolet Light Transmission: A Cross-Sectional Study. Modeled Cost Analysis Using CPT/Medicare Rates and Approach Comparing Superficial Radiation Therapy Versus Mohs in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Managing Large Nasal Defects. A Prospective Comparison of the Environmental Impact, Cost, and Surgical Site Infection Rate of 1 Versus 2 Trays in Mohs Micrographic Surgery. The Hemostatic Net as a Simple Adjunct for Bleeding Control in Scalp Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1