Impact of Implant Exchange Timing after Postmastectomy Radiation in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011588
Ashley E Chang, Ellen F Niu, Stephanie E Honig, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Saïd C Azoury
{"title":"Impact of Implant Exchange Timing after Postmastectomy Radiation in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Ashley E Chang, Ellen F Niu, Stephanie E Honig, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Saïd C Azoury","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in the setting of immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly widespread. However, the timeframe of tissue expander exchange for permanent implant placement following PMRT is not well defined, and it remains unclear what time interval optimizes surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 was completed. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched under keywords pertaining to concepts of tissue expander breast reconstruction and PMRT. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary articles on tissue expander breast reconstruction with adjuvant radiation therapy reporting timing of exchange to permanent implant following radiation therapy and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 1259 publications, 15 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 11 studies had granular enough data to use for pooled analysis. Implant exchange less than 6 months after PMRT was found to be associated with increased incidence of wound dehiscence (17.12% versus 3.64%; P < 0.001) and hematoma (25% versus 2.59%; P < 0.001) compared with exchange after 6 months. There was no significant difference in incidence of surgical-site infection, seroma, capsular contracture, or reconstructive failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expander-to-implant exchange at less than 6 months is associated with a higher incidence of wound dehiscence and hematoma formation but does not increase the risk of reconstruction failure. The limited research on ideal timing prompts further investigation to optimize surgical outcomes for the increasing patient population undergoing PMRT and immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"9e-15e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in the setting of immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly widespread. However, the timeframe of tissue expander exchange for permanent implant placement following PMRT is not well defined, and it remains unclear what time interval optimizes surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Methods: A systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 was completed. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched under keywords pertaining to concepts of tissue expander breast reconstruction and PMRT. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary articles on tissue expander breast reconstruction with adjuvant radiation therapy reporting timing of exchange to permanent implant following radiation therapy and surgical outcomes.

Results: Of the initial 1259 publications, 15 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 11 studies had granular enough data to use for pooled analysis. Implant exchange less than 6 months after PMRT was found to be associated with increased incidence of wound dehiscence (17.12% versus 3.64%; P < 0.001) and hematoma (25% versus 2.59%; P < 0.001) compared with exchange after 6 months. There was no significant difference in incidence of surgical-site infection, seroma, capsular contracture, or reconstructive failure.

Conclusions: Expander-to-implant exchange at less than 6 months is associated with a higher incidence of wound dehiscence and hematoma formation but does not increase the risk of reconstruction failure. The limited research on ideal timing prompts further investigation to optimize surgical outcomes for the increasing patient population undergoing PMRT and immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即刻组织扩张器乳房再造术中乳房切除术后放射治疗后假体置换时间的影响:系统回顾。
背景:乳房切除术后放射治疗(PMRT)在即刻两阶段乳房重建中的应用越来越广泛。然而,PMRT 术后组织扩张器置换永久植入物的时间框架尚未明确,目前仍不清楚什么样的时间间隔能使手术效果和患者满意度达到最佳:方法:按照 PRISMA 2020 标准完成了一项系统性综述。方法:根据 PRISMA 2020 标准完成了一项系统性综述,在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索了与组织扩张器乳房重建和 PMRT 概念相关的关键词。纳入标准包括有关组织扩张器乳房重建与辅助放射治疗的主要文章,这些文章报告了放射治疗后更换为永久植入物的时间以及手术结果:在最初的 1,259 篇文献中,有 15 项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中 11 项研究的数据足够精细,可用于汇总分析。研究发现,PMRT术后6个月内更换种植体与伤口开裂发生率增加有关(17.12% vs 3.64%,p结论:PMRT术后6个月内更换种植体与伤口开裂发生率增加有关:扩张器到植入物交换时间不足 6 个月与伤口开裂和血肿形成的发生率较高有关,但不会增加重建失败的风险。关于理想时间的研究有限,这促使我们进一步研究,以优化越来越多接受 PMRT 和即刻两阶段乳房重建的患者的手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Subfascial Mini-Muscle Release Dual-Plane Technique: A Modified Procedure for Breast Augmentation. Reported Prices for High-Volume Hand Surgery in the Era of Price Transparency: Implications for Future Policy Iterations. The L-Shaped Zygomatic Reduction with Oblique or Vertical Resection: Which One Is the Optimal Choice? Heterotopic Ossification Is Associated with Painful Neuromas in Transtibial Amputees Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuromas. Pregnancy Termination Policy and Cleft Lip and Palate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1