Katya Remy, Conor Mullen, Merel Hj Hazewinkel, Matthew A DePamphilis, William G Austen, Robert R Hagan, Lisa Gfrerer
{"title":"Lesser Occipital Nerve Decompression Through a Single Vertical Midline Incision Reduces Reoperation Rates.","authors":"Katya Remy, Conor Mullen, Merel Hj Hazewinkel, Matthew A DePamphilis, William G Austen, Robert R Hagan, Lisa Gfrerer","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nerve decompression surgery for occipital neuralgia (ON) of the lesser occipital nerve (LON) is oftentimes performed in combination with treatment of the greater and third occipital nerves (GON and TON). The traditional surgical approach requires multiple separate incisions. This study describes combined GON/LON approach through a single vertical midline incision and reports on the postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 1713 patients who were screened for nerve decompression surgery between 2011 and 2023, those who underwent combined GON/LON decompression for treatment of ON were identified retrospectively. Patients who underwent LON decompression through the vertical midline incision were compared to those who underwent LON decompression through a separate incision. Outcomes included postoperative complications, LON reoperation, pain frequency (days/month), intensity (scale 0-10), duration (hours), and Migraine Head Index (MHI) at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 patients underwent 184 combined GON/LON surgeries. LON decompression was performed through a midline incision in 91 (73.4%) patients and through a separate incision in 33 (26.6%). LON reoperation rates for pain recurrence were higher in the separate incision group as compared to the midline incision group (15.2% versus 4.4%, p<0.05). At a median follow-up of 17.9 months after the last intervention, reductions in pain frequency, intensity, duration and MHI were comparable between both techniques (p>0.05). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between both groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During combined GON/LON surgery, approaching the LON through the midline incision is feasible and allows for safe and effective LON decompression or neurectomy, with lower reoperation rates for recurrent pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nerve decompression surgery for occipital neuralgia (ON) of the lesser occipital nerve (LON) is oftentimes performed in combination with treatment of the greater and third occipital nerves (GON and TON). The traditional surgical approach requires multiple separate incisions. This study describes combined GON/LON approach through a single vertical midline incision and reports on the postoperative outcomes.
Methods: Among 1713 patients who were screened for nerve decompression surgery between 2011 and 2023, those who underwent combined GON/LON decompression for treatment of ON were identified retrospectively. Patients who underwent LON decompression through the vertical midline incision were compared to those who underwent LON decompression through a separate incision. Outcomes included postoperative complications, LON reoperation, pain frequency (days/month), intensity (scale 0-10), duration (hours), and Migraine Head Index (MHI) at final follow-up.
Results: A total of 124 patients underwent 184 combined GON/LON surgeries. LON decompression was performed through a midline incision in 91 (73.4%) patients and through a separate incision in 33 (26.6%). LON reoperation rates for pain recurrence were higher in the separate incision group as compared to the midline incision group (15.2% versus 4.4%, p<0.05). At a median follow-up of 17.9 months after the last intervention, reductions in pain frequency, intensity, duration and MHI were comparable between both techniques (p>0.05). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between both groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: During combined GON/LON surgery, approaching the LON through the midline incision is feasible and allows for safe and effective LON decompression or neurectomy, with lower reoperation rates for recurrent pain.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.