Lesser Occipital Nerve Decompression through a Single Vertical Midline Incision Reduces Reoperation Rates.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012008
Katya Remy, Conor Mullen, Merel H J Hazewinkel, Matthew A DePamphilis, William G Austen, Robert R Hagan, Lisa Gfrerer
{"title":"Lesser Occipital Nerve Decompression through a Single Vertical Midline Incision Reduces Reoperation Rates.","authors":"Katya Remy, Conor Mullen, Merel H J Hazewinkel, Matthew A DePamphilis, William G Austen, Robert R Hagan, Lisa Gfrerer","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nerve decompression surgery for occipital neuralgia of the lesser occipital nerve (LON) is often performed in combination with treatment of the greater occipital nerve (GON) and the third occipital nerve. The traditional surgical approach of combined GON/LON decompression requires multiple separate incisions. This study describes a single vertical midline incision approach and reports on the postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 1713 patients who were screened for nerve decompression surgery between 2011 and 2023, those who underwent combined GON/LON decompression for treatment of occipital neuralgia were identified retrospectively. Patients who underwent the single vertical midline incision approach were compared with those who underwent the separate incision approach. Outcomes included postoperative complications; LON reoperation; pain frequency (days per month), intensity (scale, 0 to 10), and duration (hours); and Migraine Head Index at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 patients underwent 184 combined GON/LON operations. LON decompression was performed through a midline incision in 91 patients (73.4%) and through a separate incision in 33 patients (26.6%). LON reoperation rates for pain recurrence were higher in the separate incision group as compared with the midline incision group (15.2% versus 4.4%; P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 17.9 months after the last intervention, reductions in pain frequency, intensity, duration, and Migraine Head Index were comparable between both techniques ( P > 0.05). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between both groups ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During combined GON/LON surgery, approaching the LON through the midline incision is feasible and allows for safe and effective LON decompression or neurectomy, with lower reoperation rates for recurrent pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"412e-419e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nerve decompression surgery for occipital neuralgia of the lesser occipital nerve (LON) is often performed in combination with treatment of the greater occipital nerve (GON) and the third occipital nerve. The traditional surgical approach of combined GON/LON decompression requires multiple separate incisions. This study describes a single vertical midline incision approach and reports on the postoperative outcomes.

Methods: Among 1713 patients who were screened for nerve decompression surgery between 2011 and 2023, those who underwent combined GON/LON decompression for treatment of occipital neuralgia were identified retrospectively. Patients who underwent the single vertical midline incision approach were compared with those who underwent the separate incision approach. Outcomes included postoperative complications; LON reoperation; pain frequency (days per month), intensity (scale, 0 to 10), and duration (hours); and Migraine Head Index at final follow-up.

Results: A total of 124 patients underwent 184 combined GON/LON operations. LON decompression was performed through a midline incision in 91 patients (73.4%) and through a separate incision in 33 patients (26.6%). LON reoperation rates for pain recurrence were higher in the separate incision group as compared with the midline incision group (15.2% versus 4.4%; P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 17.9 months after the last intervention, reductions in pain frequency, intensity, duration, and Migraine Head Index were comparable between both techniques ( P > 0.05). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between both groups ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion: During combined GON/LON surgery, approaching the LON through the midline incision is feasible and allows for safe and effective LON decompression or neurectomy, with lower reoperation rates for recurrent pain.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过单个垂直中线切口进行枕小神经减压术可降低再手术率。
前言:小枕神经(LON)的枕神经痛(ON)的神经减压手术通常与大枕神经和第三枕神经(GON和TON)的治疗联合进行。传统的手术方法需要多个独立的切口。本研究描述了通过单一垂直中线切口的GON/LON联合入路,并报告了术后结果。方法:在2011年至2023年接受神经减压手术筛查的1713例患者中,回顾性分析行GON/LON联合减压治疗ON的患者。通过垂直中线切口行LON减压的患者与通过单独切口行LON减压的患者进行比较。结果包括术后并发症、LON再手术、疼痛频率(天/月)、强度(评分0-10)、持续时间(小时)和最终随访时偏头痛指数(MHI)。结果:124例患者共接受了184例GON/LON联合手术。91例(73.4%)患者通过中线切口进行LON减压,33例(26.6%)患者通过单独切口进行LON减压。单独切口组疼痛复发再手术率高于中线切口组(15.2%比4.4%,p0.05)。两组术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:在GON/LON联合手术中,通过中线切口接近LON是可行的,可以安全有效地进行LON减压或神经切除术,复发疼痛的再手术率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative nerve blocks for pain reduction in robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty: A prospective cohort study. "Plastic Surgery Exposure in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of LCME Accredited M.D. Schools". Out-of-Pocket Expenses Associated with Hand Trauma: A 12-Month Analysis After Injury. Additional Surgery after Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition: An 8 Year Follow-Up of 1369 Patients. Vasospastic and Ischemic Disorders of the Upper Extremity: Vascular Radiology Collaborations Guiding Raynaud's Treatment Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1