Predictive modeling of ambulatory outcomes after spinal cord injury using machine learning

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01008-2
Christina Draganich, Dustin Anderson, Grant J. Dornan, Mitch Sevigny, Jeffrey Berliner, Susan Charlifue, Abigail Welch, Andrew Smith
{"title":"Predictive modeling of ambulatory outcomes after spinal cord injury using machine learning","authors":"Christina Draganich, Dustin Anderson, Grant J. Dornan, Mitch Sevigny, Jeffrey Berliner, Susan Charlifue, Abigail Welch, Andrew Smith","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01008-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective multi-site cohort study. To develop an accurate machine learning predictive model using predictor variables from the acute rehabilitation period to determine ambulatory status in spinal cord injury (SCI) one year post injury. Model SCI System (SCIMS) database between January 2000 and May 2019. Retrospective cohort study using data that were previously collected as part of the SCI Model System (SCIMS) database. A total of 4523 patients were analyzed comparing traditional models (van Middendorp and Hicks) compared to machine learning algorithms including Elastic Net Penalized Logistic Regression (ENPLR), Gradient Boosted Machine (GBM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Compared with GBM and ANN, ENPLR was determined to be the preferred model based on predictive accuracy metrics, calibration, and variable selection. The primary metric to judge discrimination was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). When compared to the van Middendorp all patients (0.916), ASIA A and D (0.951) and ASIA B and C (0.775) and Hicks all patients (0.89), ASIA A and D (0.934) and ASIA B and C (0.775), ENPLR demonstrated improved AUC for all patients (0.931), ASIA A and D (0.965) ASIA B and C (0.803). Utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning methods are feasible for accurately classifying outcomes in SCI and may provide improved sensitivity in identifying which individuals are less likely to ambulate and may benefit from augmentative strategies, such as neuromodulation. Future directions should include the use of additional variables to further refine these models.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"62 8","pages":"446-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01008-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective multi-site cohort study. To develop an accurate machine learning predictive model using predictor variables from the acute rehabilitation period to determine ambulatory status in spinal cord injury (SCI) one year post injury. Model SCI System (SCIMS) database between January 2000 and May 2019. Retrospective cohort study using data that were previously collected as part of the SCI Model System (SCIMS) database. A total of 4523 patients were analyzed comparing traditional models (van Middendorp and Hicks) compared to machine learning algorithms including Elastic Net Penalized Logistic Regression (ENPLR), Gradient Boosted Machine (GBM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Compared with GBM and ANN, ENPLR was determined to be the preferred model based on predictive accuracy metrics, calibration, and variable selection. The primary metric to judge discrimination was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). When compared to the van Middendorp all patients (0.916), ASIA A and D (0.951) and ASIA B and C (0.775) and Hicks all patients (0.89), ASIA A and D (0.934) and ASIA B and C (0.775), ENPLR demonstrated improved AUC for all patients (0.931), ASIA A and D (0.965) ASIA B and C (0.803). Utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning methods are feasible for accurately classifying outcomes in SCI and may provide improved sensitivity in identifying which individuals are less likely to ambulate and may benefit from augmentative strategies, such as neuromodulation. Future directions should include the use of additional variables to further refine these models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习对脊髓损伤后的康复结果进行预测建模。
研究设计目标:利用急性康复期的预测变量,开发一个准确的机器学习预测模型,以确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者伤后一年的活动状态:利用急性康复期的预测变量开发精确的机器学习预测模型,以确定脊髓损伤(SCI)伤后一年的活动状态:2000年1月至2019年5月期间的SCI模型系统(SCIMS)数据库:回顾性队列研究,使用之前作为 SCI 模型系统(SCIMS)数据库一部分收集的数据。共对 4523 名患者进行了分析,将传统模型(van Middendorp 和 Hicks)与机器学习算法(包括弹性净惩罚逻辑回归(ENPLR)、梯度提升机(GBM)和人工神经网络(ANN))进行了比较:结果:与 GBM 和 ANN 相比,根据预测准确度指标、校准和变量选择,ENPLR 被确定为首选模型。判别的主要指标是接收者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)。与 van Middendorp 所有患者(0.916)、ASIA A 和 D(0.951)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.775)和 Hicks 所有患者(0.89)、ASIA A 和 D(0.934)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.775)相比,ENPLR 对所有患者(0.931)、ASIA A 和 D(0.965)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.803)的 AUC 有所提高:利用人工智能和机器学习方法对 SCI 的结果进行准确分类是可行的,而且可以提高灵敏度,识别出哪些患者不太可能行走,并可能从神经调控等增强策略中获益。未来的发展方向应包括使用其他变量来进一步完善这些模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
The influencing factors for tracheostomy decannulation after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. "What should a rehabilitation hospital be like?" Priorities and expectations of people with spinal cord injury in Türkiye. The effect of abdominal functional electrical stimulation on blood pressure in people with high level spinal cord injury. Mortality and causes of death of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Correspondence to "Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1