Christina Draganich, Dustin Anderson, Grant J. Dornan, Mitch Sevigny, Jeffrey Berliner, Susan Charlifue, Abigail Welch, Andrew Smith
{"title":"Predictive modeling of ambulatory outcomes after spinal cord injury using machine learning","authors":"Christina Draganich, Dustin Anderson, Grant J. Dornan, Mitch Sevigny, Jeffrey Berliner, Susan Charlifue, Abigail Welch, Andrew Smith","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01008-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective multi-site cohort study. To develop an accurate machine learning predictive model using predictor variables from the acute rehabilitation period to determine ambulatory status in spinal cord injury (SCI) one year post injury. Model SCI System (SCIMS) database between January 2000 and May 2019. Retrospective cohort study using data that were previously collected as part of the SCI Model System (SCIMS) database. A total of 4523 patients were analyzed comparing traditional models (van Middendorp and Hicks) compared to machine learning algorithms including Elastic Net Penalized Logistic Regression (ENPLR), Gradient Boosted Machine (GBM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Compared with GBM and ANN, ENPLR was determined to be the preferred model based on predictive accuracy metrics, calibration, and variable selection. The primary metric to judge discrimination was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). When compared to the van Middendorp all patients (0.916), ASIA A and D (0.951) and ASIA B and C (0.775) and Hicks all patients (0.89), ASIA A and D (0.934) and ASIA B and C (0.775), ENPLR demonstrated improved AUC for all patients (0.931), ASIA A and D (0.965) ASIA B and C (0.803). Utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning methods are feasible for accurately classifying outcomes in SCI and may provide improved sensitivity in identifying which individuals are less likely to ambulate and may benefit from augmentative strategies, such as neuromodulation. Future directions should include the use of additional variables to further refine these models.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"62 8","pages":"446-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01008-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Retrospective multi-site cohort study. To develop an accurate machine learning predictive model using predictor variables from the acute rehabilitation period to determine ambulatory status in spinal cord injury (SCI) one year post injury. Model SCI System (SCIMS) database between January 2000 and May 2019. Retrospective cohort study using data that were previously collected as part of the SCI Model System (SCIMS) database. A total of 4523 patients were analyzed comparing traditional models (van Middendorp and Hicks) compared to machine learning algorithms including Elastic Net Penalized Logistic Regression (ENPLR), Gradient Boosted Machine (GBM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Compared with GBM and ANN, ENPLR was determined to be the preferred model based on predictive accuracy metrics, calibration, and variable selection. The primary metric to judge discrimination was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). When compared to the van Middendorp all patients (0.916), ASIA A and D (0.951) and ASIA B and C (0.775) and Hicks all patients (0.89), ASIA A and D (0.934) and ASIA B and C (0.775), ENPLR demonstrated improved AUC for all patients (0.931), ASIA A and D (0.965) ASIA B and C (0.803). Utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning methods are feasible for accurately classifying outcomes in SCI and may provide improved sensitivity in identifying which individuals are less likely to ambulate and may benefit from augmentative strategies, such as neuromodulation. Future directions should include the use of additional variables to further refine these models.
研究设计目标:利用急性康复期的预测变量,开发一个准确的机器学习预测模型,以确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者伤后一年的活动状态:利用急性康复期的预测变量开发精确的机器学习预测模型,以确定脊髓损伤(SCI)伤后一年的活动状态:2000年1月至2019年5月期间的SCI模型系统(SCIMS)数据库:回顾性队列研究,使用之前作为 SCI 模型系统(SCIMS)数据库一部分收集的数据。共对 4523 名患者进行了分析,将传统模型(van Middendorp 和 Hicks)与机器学习算法(包括弹性净惩罚逻辑回归(ENPLR)、梯度提升机(GBM)和人工神经网络(ANN))进行了比较:结果:与 GBM 和 ANN 相比,根据预测准确度指标、校准和变量选择,ENPLR 被确定为首选模型。判别的主要指标是接收者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)。与 van Middendorp 所有患者(0.916)、ASIA A 和 D(0.951)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.775)和 Hicks 所有患者(0.89)、ASIA A 和 D(0.934)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.775)相比,ENPLR 对所有患者(0.931)、ASIA A 和 D(0.965)以及 ASIA B 和 C(0.803)的 AUC 有所提高:利用人工智能和机器学习方法对 SCI 的结果进行准确分类是可行的,而且可以提高灵敏度,识别出哪些患者不太可能行走,并可能从神经调控等增强策略中获益。未来的发展方向应包括使用其他变量来进一步完善这些模型。
期刊介绍:
Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews.
Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.