Is order-2 proportionality good enough for approximating the most likely path flow in user equilibrium traffic assignment?

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part B-Methodological Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2024.103007
Liyang Feng , Jun Xie , Xiaobo Liu , Youhua Tang , David Z.W. Wang , Yu (Marco) Nie
{"title":"Is order-2 proportionality good enough for approximating the most likely path flow in user equilibrium traffic assignment?","authors":"Liyang Feng ,&nbsp;Jun Xie ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Liu ,&nbsp;Youhua Tang ,&nbsp;David Z.W. Wang ,&nbsp;Yu (Marco) Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The proportionality condition is a standard approach to dealing with the non-uniqueness issue in the user equilibrium (UE) traffic assignment problems (TAP). Although the proportionality condition can reduce the degree of arbitrariness, it remains unclear how much arbitrariness remains and whether it can meaningfully affect model outcomes and relevant decisions that depend on them. The answers to these questions are impeded by the lack of an efficient algorithm that can find the exact maximum entropy UE path flow solution for networks of practical size. In this paper, we fill this gap by developing a high-performance augmented Lagrangian algorithm that effectively exploits the special problem structure. Our numerical results reveal that there are a considerable number of links with non-negligible arbitrariness in the solution generated by the proportionality condition, and that this problem becomes worse if the level of congestion increases in the network. Since about a decade ago, many practitioners have relied on state-of-the-art traffic assignment tools based on the proportionality condition to perform select link analysis, among other applications. The results reported herein are a reminder that their toolbox may need reevaluation and perhaps an upgrade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 103007"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proportionality condition is a standard approach to dealing with the non-uniqueness issue in the user equilibrium (UE) traffic assignment problems (TAP). Although the proportionality condition can reduce the degree of arbitrariness, it remains unclear how much arbitrariness remains and whether it can meaningfully affect model outcomes and relevant decisions that depend on them. The answers to these questions are impeded by the lack of an efficient algorithm that can find the exact maximum entropy UE path flow solution for networks of practical size. In this paper, we fill this gap by developing a high-performance augmented Lagrangian algorithm that effectively exploits the special problem structure. Our numerical results reveal that there are a considerable number of links with non-negligible arbitrariness in the solution generated by the proportionality condition, and that this problem becomes worse if the level of congestion increases in the network. Since about a decade ago, many practitioners have relied on state-of-the-art traffic assignment tools based on the proportionality condition to perform select link analysis, among other applications. The results reported herein are a reminder that their toolbox may need reevaluation and perhaps an upgrade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在用户均衡流量分配中,阶 2 比例是否足以近似最可能的路径流量?
比例条件是处理用户均衡(UE)流量分配问题(TAP)中非唯一性问题的标准方法。尽管比例条件可以降低任意性的程度,但目前仍不清楚任意性的程度,也不清楚任意性是否会对模型结果和依赖于模型结果的相关决策产生有意义的影响。由于缺乏一种高效的算法,无法为实际规模的网络找到精确的最大熵 UE 路径流解决方案,因此阻碍了对这些问题的回答。本文通过开发一种能有效利用特殊问题结构的高性能增强拉格朗日算法,填补了这一空白。我们的数值结果表明,在比例条件生成的解中,有相当数量的链路具有不可忽略的任意性,而且如果网络中的拥塞程度增加,这个问题就会变得更加严重。大约从十年前开始,许多从业人员就开始依赖基于比例条件的先进流量分配工具来执行选择链路分析等应用。本文报告的结果提醒人们,他们的工具箱可能需要重新评估,或许还需要升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of parking, vehicle charging and vehicle-to-grid services in the era of electric vehicles A novel data fusion method to leverage passively-collected mobility data in generating spatially-heterogeneous synthetic population The drone scheduling problem in shore-to-ship delivery: A time discretization-based model with an exact solving approach Modelling the impacts of en-route ride-pooling service in a mixed pooling and non-pooling market Amachine learning technique embedded reference-dependent choice model for explanatory power improvement: Shifting of reference point as a key factor in vehicle purchase decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1