Quantitative evaluation of anthropogenic sources and health risks of rare earth elements in airborne particulate matter.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173960
Wenkai Guan, Jing Zhang, Qian Liu
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of anthropogenic sources and health risks of rare earth elements in airborne particulate matter.","authors":"Wenkai Guan, Jing Zhang, Qian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rare earth elements (REEs) have emerged as contaminants in airborne particulate matter (PM); however, their anthropogenic sources remain poorly quantified, and associated health risks are unknown. This study investigates the REE distribution across eight sizes of airborne PM during July and December in Qingdao, a major Chinese port city. Our results reveal a single coarse-mode distribution with REE concentrations. In contrast, fine PM (size: 0.43-2.1 μm) exhibits notable enrichment of La and Ce compared to Al and other REEs. This study traces La and Ce enrichment to fluid catalytic cracking catalysts (FCCC)-related sources, including refinery and ship emissions, by comparing the REE fractionation in samples with potential sources. We quantify the contributions from FCCC-related sources to La (July: 33.6 % ± 3.2 %, Dec.: 46.4 % ± 5.2 %) and Ce (July: 16.5 % ± 14.3 %, Dec.: 30.3 % ± 12.2 %) by comparing measured concentrations with predictions derived from neighboring REEs, a method previously used exclusively in aquatic systems. For the first time, supply ratios of refinery and ship to FCCC-related La are calculated using a two-component mixing model based on the [La]<sub>FCCC</sub>/[V]<sub>anth</sub>, revealing the dominance of refinery emissions (July: 97.3 % ± 0.6 %, Dec.: 99.6 % ± 0.1 %). Furthermore, a global review of La and Ce anomalies that integrates published REE data with our findings reveals a widespread distribution of positive anomalies. The significantly positive correlation between La and Ce anomalies underscores FCCC-related emissions as a global source in fine PM, contributing 0-92 % (mean: 35 % ± 33 %) for La and 0-72 % (mean: 21 % ± 24 %) for Ce. Although the non-carcinogenic health risks of Ce are generally low globally, concerns should be raised in areas near source emissions, where Ce health risks sharply increased along with its concentrations. There is urgently need to establish a threshold value for La, owing to its global enrichment. This study provides novel insights into the sources and health implications of REEs in airborne PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rare earth elements (REEs) have emerged as contaminants in airborne particulate matter (PM); however, their anthropogenic sources remain poorly quantified, and associated health risks are unknown. This study investigates the REE distribution across eight sizes of airborne PM during July and December in Qingdao, a major Chinese port city. Our results reveal a single coarse-mode distribution with REE concentrations. In contrast, fine PM (size: 0.43-2.1 μm) exhibits notable enrichment of La and Ce compared to Al and other REEs. This study traces La and Ce enrichment to fluid catalytic cracking catalysts (FCCC)-related sources, including refinery and ship emissions, by comparing the REE fractionation in samples with potential sources. We quantify the contributions from FCCC-related sources to La (July: 33.6 % ± 3.2 %, Dec.: 46.4 % ± 5.2 %) and Ce (July: 16.5 % ± 14.3 %, Dec.: 30.3 % ± 12.2 %) by comparing measured concentrations with predictions derived from neighboring REEs, a method previously used exclusively in aquatic systems. For the first time, supply ratios of refinery and ship to FCCC-related La are calculated using a two-component mixing model based on the [La]FCCC/[V]anth, revealing the dominance of refinery emissions (July: 97.3 % ± 0.6 %, Dec.: 99.6 % ± 0.1 %). Furthermore, a global review of La and Ce anomalies that integrates published REE data with our findings reveals a widespread distribution of positive anomalies. The significantly positive correlation between La and Ce anomalies underscores FCCC-related emissions as a global source in fine PM, contributing 0-92 % (mean: 35 % ± 33 %) for La and 0-72 % (mean: 21 % ± 24 %) for Ce. Although the non-carcinogenic health risks of Ce are generally low globally, concerns should be raised in areas near source emissions, where Ce health risks sharply increased along with its concentrations. There is urgently need to establish a threshold value for La, owing to its global enrichment. This study provides novel insights into the sources and health implications of REEs in airborne PM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量评估空气颗粒物中稀土元素的人为来源和健康风险。
稀土元素(REEs)已成为空气中颗粒物(PM)的污染物;然而,其人为来源的量化程度仍然很低,相关的健康风险也不得而知。本研究调查了中国主要港口城市青岛在 7 月和 12 月间八种粒径的空气中可吸入颗粒物中 REE 的分布情况。我们的研究结果表明,REE 浓度呈单一粗模分布。相比之下,细颗粒物(粒径:0.43-2.1 μm)中的镧和铈的富集程度明显高于铝和其他稀土元素。本研究通过比较具有潜在来源的样本中的 REE 分馏,追溯与流体催化裂化催化剂 (FCCC) 相关的 La 和 Ce 富集来源,包括炼油厂和船舶排放。通过比较测量浓度与邻近 REEs 预测值,我们量化了 FCCC 相关来源对 La(7 月:33.6 % ± 3.2 %,12 月:46.4 % ± 5.2 %)和 Ce(7 月:16.5 % ± 14.3 %,12 月:30.3 % ± 12.2 %)的贡献。利用基于[La]FCCC/[V]anth 的双组分混合模型,首次计算了炼油厂和船舶与 FCCC 相关的 La 供应比率,揭示了炼油厂排放的主导地位(7 月:97.3 % ± 0.6 %,12 月:99.6 % ± 0.1 %)。此外,将已公布的 REE 数据与我们的研究结果相结合,对 La 和 Ce 异常点进行的全球审查显示,正异常点分布广泛。La和Ce异常之间明显的正相关性突出表明,与《气候变化框架公约》相关的排放是细微可吸入颗粒物的一个全球来源,其中La的贡献率为0-92%(平均值:35%±33%),Ce的贡献率为0-72%(平均值:21%±24%)。尽管从全球范围来看,Ce 的非致癌健康风险普遍较低,但应引起人们对排放源附近地区的关注,因为在这些地区,Ce 的健康风险随着其浓度的增加而急剧上升。由于 La 在全球的富集程度,迫切需要为其确定一个阈值。这项研究为了解空气中可吸入颗粒物中稀土元素的来源及其对健康的影响提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
The interplay of future solar energy, land cover change, and their projected impacts on natural lands and croplands in the US. Species on the move: Impacts of climate change on the spatial range of endemic fishes of the eco-sensitive semi-arid area of the Arabian Peninsula. A conceptual approach for an innovative marine animal forest apparatus that facilitates carbon sequestration and biodiversity enhancement. The effect of cross-regional transport on ozone and particulate matter pollution in China: A review of methodology and current knowledge. Efficacy of chemical digestion methods to reveal undamaged microplastics from planktonic samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1