Clinical sensemaking: Advancing a conceptual learning model of clinical reasoning.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1111/medu.15461
Charilaos Koufidis, Katri Manninen, Juha Nieminen, Martin Wohlin, Charlotte Silén
{"title":"Clinical sensemaking: Advancing a conceptual learning model of clinical reasoning.","authors":"Charilaos Koufidis, Katri Manninen, Juha Nieminen, Martin Wohlin, Charlotte Silén","doi":"10.1111/medu.15461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Much remains unanswered regarding how clinical reasoning is learned in the clinical environment. This study attempts to unravel how novice medical students learn to reason, by examining how they make sense of the clinical patient encounter.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current study was part of a greater research project employing constructivist grounded theory (CGT) to develop a learning model of clinical reasoning. Introducing the sensemaking perspective, as a sensitising concept, we conducted a second level analytic phase with CGT, to further advance our previously developed model. This involved re-examining collected data from semi-structured interviews, participant observations and field interviews of novice students during their early clinical clerkships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A learning model of how medical students make sense of the patient encounter emerged from the analysis. At its core lie three interdependent processes that co-constitute the students' clinical sensemaking activity. Framing the situation is the process whereby students discern salient situational elements, place them into a meaningful relationship and integrate them into a clinical problem. Inquiring into the situation is the process whereby students gain further insight into the situation by determining which questions need to be asked. Lastly, taking meaningful action is the process whereby students carve out a pathway of action, appropriate for the circumstances. Tensions experienced during these processes impair clinical sensemaking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides an empirically informed learning model of clinical reasoning, during the early curricular stages. The model attempts to capture the complexity of medical practice, as students learn to recognise and respond to what constitutes the essence of a clinical situation. In this way, it contributes to a conceptual shift in how we think and talk about clinical reasoning. It introduces the concept of clinical sensemaking, as the act of carving a tangible clinical problem out of an often undetermined clinical situation and pursuing justified action.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Much remains unanswered regarding how clinical reasoning is learned in the clinical environment. This study attempts to unravel how novice medical students learn to reason, by examining how they make sense of the clinical patient encounter.

Method: The current study was part of a greater research project employing constructivist grounded theory (CGT) to develop a learning model of clinical reasoning. Introducing the sensemaking perspective, as a sensitising concept, we conducted a second level analytic phase with CGT, to further advance our previously developed model. This involved re-examining collected data from semi-structured interviews, participant observations and field interviews of novice students during their early clinical clerkships.

Results: A learning model of how medical students make sense of the patient encounter emerged from the analysis. At its core lie three interdependent processes that co-constitute the students' clinical sensemaking activity. Framing the situation is the process whereby students discern salient situational elements, place them into a meaningful relationship and integrate them into a clinical problem. Inquiring into the situation is the process whereby students gain further insight into the situation by determining which questions need to be asked. Lastly, taking meaningful action is the process whereby students carve out a pathway of action, appropriate for the circumstances. Tensions experienced during these processes impair clinical sensemaking.

Conclusions: The study provides an empirically informed learning model of clinical reasoning, during the early curricular stages. The model attempts to capture the complexity of medical practice, as students learn to recognise and respond to what constitutes the essence of a clinical situation. In this way, it contributes to a conceptual shift in how we think and talk about clinical reasoning. It introduces the concept of clinical sensemaking, as the act of carving a tangible clinical problem out of an often undetermined clinical situation and pursuing justified action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床推理:推进临床推理的概念学习模型。
背景:关于在临床环境中如何学习临床推理,还有很多问题尚未解决。本研究试图通过考察新手医学生如何理解临床病人的遭遇,揭示他们是如何学习推理的:本研究是更大的研究项目的一部分,采用建构主义基础理论(CGT)来开发临床推理的学习模型。我们引入了 "感性认识 "这一敏感概念,利用建构主义基础理论(CGT)进行了二级分析,以进一步推进我们之前开发的模型。这包括重新审查从半结构式访谈、参与观察和对新手学生在早期临床实习期间的实地访谈中收集到的数据:结果:通过分析,得出了医学生如何理解与病人接触的学习模型。其核心是三个相互依存的过程,它们共同构成了学生的临床感知活动。确定情境是学生辨别突出的情境要素、将其置于有意义的关系中并将其整合到临床问题中的过程。探究情境是学生通过确定需要提出哪些问题来进一步深入了解情境的过程。最后,采取有意义的行动是学生根据具体情况制定行动路线的过程。在这些过程中经历的紧张情绪会损害临床感知能力:本研究提供了一个以经验为依据的临床推理学习模型。该模型试图捕捉医疗实践的复杂性,因为学生要学会识别和应对临床情况的本质。通过这种方式,它有助于转变我们对临床推理的思考和讨论方式。它引入了 "临床感知"(clinical sensemaking)的概念,即从往往无法确定的临床情况中找出具体的临床问题,并采取合理的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Forward thinking with reverse mentoring: Prioritising well-being over professional development. Going to work sick: A scoping review of illness presenteeism among physicians and medical trainees. Inspiring young minds: Celebrating innovations in widening participation. Professionalism lapses in health professions training: Navigating the 'Yellow Card' moments for transformative learning. Residents' perceptions of what makes feedback valuable in workplace-based learning: A discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1