The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108939
Leonardo Fernandino , Lisa L. Conant
{"title":"The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity","authors":"Leonardo Fernandino ,&nbsp;Lisa L. Conant","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The organization of semantic memory, including memory for word meanings, has long been a central question in cognitive science. Although there is general agreement that word meaning representations must make contact with sensory-motor and affective experiences in a non-arbitrary fashion, the nature of this relationship remains controversial. One prominent view proposes that word meanings are represented directly in terms of their experiential content (i.e., sensory-motor and affective representations). Opponents of this view argue that the representation of word meanings reflects primarily taxonomic structure, that is, their relationships to natural categories. In addition, the recent success of language models based on word co-occurrence (i.e., distributional) information in emulating human linguistic behavior has led to proposals that this kind of information may play an important role in the representation of lexical concepts. We used a semantic priming paradigm designed for representational similarity analysis (RSA) to quantitatively assess how well each of these theories explains the representational similarity pattern for a large set of words. Crucially, we used partial correlation RSA to account for intercorrelations between model predictions, which allowed us to assess, for the first time, the unique effect of each model. Semantic priming was driven primarily by experiential similarity between prime and target, with no evidence of an independent effect of distributional or taxonomic similarity. Furthermore, only the experiential models accounted for unique variance in priming after partialling out explicit similarity ratings. These results support experiential accounts of semantic representation and indicate that, despite their good performance at some linguistic tasks, the distributional models evaluated here do not encode the same kind of information used by the human semantic system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization of semantic memory, including memory for word meanings, has long been a central question in cognitive science. Although there is general agreement that word meaning representations must make contact with sensory-motor and affective experiences in a non-arbitrary fashion, the nature of this relationship remains controversial. One prominent view proposes that word meanings are represented directly in terms of their experiential content (i.e., sensory-motor and affective representations). Opponents of this view argue that the representation of word meanings reflects primarily taxonomic structure, that is, their relationships to natural categories. In addition, the recent success of language models based on word co-occurrence (i.e., distributional) information in emulating human linguistic behavior has led to proposals that this kind of information may play an important role in the representation of lexical concepts. We used a semantic priming paradigm designed for representational similarity analysis (RSA) to quantitatively assess how well each of these theories explains the representational similarity pattern for a large set of words. Crucially, we used partial correlation RSA to account for intercorrelations between model predictions, which allowed us to assess, for the first time, the unique effect of each model. Semantic priming was driven primarily by experiential similarity between prime and target, with no evidence of an independent effect of distributional or taxonomic similarity. Furthermore, only the experiential models accounted for unique variance in priming after partialling out explicit similarity ratings. These results support experiential accounts of semantic representation and indicate that, despite their good performance at some linguistic tasks, the distributional models evaluated here do not encode the same kind of information used by the human semantic system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验在语言处理中的首要地位:语义引申主要由经验相似性驱动
长期以来,语义记忆(包括词义记忆)的组织一直是认知科学的核心问题。尽管人们普遍认为词义表征必须以一种非任意的方式与感觉-运动和情感体验相联系,但这种关系的性质仍然存在争议。一种著名的观点认为,词义表征是直接以其经验内容(即感觉-运动和情感表征)为基础的。反对这一观点的人则认为,词义的表征主要反映的是分类结构,即词义与自然范畴的关系。此外,最近基于词的共现(即分布)信息的语言模型在模拟人类语言行为方面取得了成功,因此有人提出这类信息可能在词义概念的表征中扮演重要角色。我们使用了一种为表征相似性分析(RSA)而设计的语义引理范式,来定量评估这些理论中的每一种在多大程度上解释了大量词语的表征相似性模式。最重要的是,我们使用了部分相关 RSA 来解释模型预测之间的相互关系,这使我们第一次能够评估每个模型的独特效果。语义引物主要是由引物和目标之间的经验相似性驱动的,没有证据表明分布或分类相似性有独立的影响。此外,在剔除明确的相似性评级后,只有经验模型能解释引物的独特差异。这些结果支持语义表征的经验描述,并表明尽管分布模型在某些语言任务中表现出色,但本文评估的分布模型并没有编码人类语义系统所使用的同类信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
On the lasting impact of mild traumatic brain injury on working memory: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence Functional connectivity of sensorimotor network before and after surgery in the supplementary motor area Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG Joyful growth vs. compulsive hedonism: A meta-analysis of brain activation on romantic love and addictive disorders Using imagination and the contents of memory to create new scene and object representations: A functional MRI study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1