Editorial Commentary: Multimodal Analgesia for Rotator Cuff Repair Should Be Individualized Based on Surgical Location and Complexity and Patient Comorbidity

{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Multimodal Analgesia for Rotator Cuff Repair Should Be Individualized Based on Surgical Location and Complexity and Patient Comorbidity","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multimodal analgesia in arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery is commonly used for pain control and to reduce opioid consumption in the early postoperative time and the days following. Indeed, the combination of local anesthetic peripheral nerve blocks and systemic or oral analgesics ensures a better outcome than the isolated use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In particular, intrascalene block has significant advantages in more complex procedures involving the anterior aspect of the shoulder. However, intrascalene block should be discouraged under conditions of respiratory comorbidity such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and morbid obesity. In such cases, a multimodal approach based on periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with pharmacologic therapies can ensure excellent pain control with limited use of opioids in the immediate postoperative period. When selecting the best therapeutic combination, it is essential to consider factors that can determine the best balance between safety and effectiveness, such as the complexity of the surgical procedure, preoperative pain, and any comorbidities that could contraindicate the use of certain medications or that could be negatively affected by potential complications or side effects of the analgesic therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324004444","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multimodal analgesia in arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery is commonly used for pain control and to reduce opioid consumption in the early postoperative time and the days following. Indeed, the combination of local anesthetic peripheral nerve blocks and systemic or oral analgesics ensures a better outcome than the isolated use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In particular, intrascalene block has significant advantages in more complex procedures involving the anterior aspect of the shoulder. However, intrascalene block should be discouraged under conditions of respiratory comorbidity such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and morbid obesity. In such cases, a multimodal approach based on periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with pharmacologic therapies can ensure excellent pain control with limited use of opioids in the immediate postoperative period. When selecting the best therapeutic combination, it is essential to consider factors that can determine the best balance between safety and effectiveness, such as the complexity of the surgical procedure, preoperative pain, and any comorbidities that could contraindicate the use of certain medications or that could be negatively affected by potential complications or side effects of the analgesic therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩袖修复术的多模式镇痛应根据手术位置、复杂程度和患者的合并症进行个体化。
关节镜肩袖手术中的多模式镇痛通常用于术后早期和术后数日的疼痛控制和减少阿片类药物的用量。事实上,与单独使用非甾体类抗炎药物相比,将局部麻醉外周神经阻滞与全身或口服镇痛药结合使用可确保更好的疗效。尤其是在涉及肩部前侧的复杂手术中,肩胛内阻滞(ISB)具有显著优势。然而,在呼吸系统合并症(如严重的慢性阻塞性肺病、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和病态肥胖)的情况下,应避免使用 ISB。在这种情况下,以关节周围浸润镇痛(PAI)为基础,结合药物疗法的多模式方法可确保在术后初期使用有限的阿片类药物,从而达到良好的疼痛控制效果。在选择最佳治疗组合时,必须考虑能够决定安全性和有效性之间最佳平衡的因素,如手术过程的复杂性、术前疼痛以及可能禁忌使用某些药物或可能受到潜在并发症或镇痛疗法副作用负面影响的任何合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply to Editorial Comment "Autologous Minced Repair of Knee Cartilage Is Safely and Effectively Performed Using Arthroscopic Techniques". Culture Expansion Alters Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Production of Osteoarthritis-relevant Cytokines and Growth Factors. Steeper Slope of the Medial Tibial Plateau, Greater Varus Alignment, and Narrower Intercondylar Distance and Notch Width Increase Risk for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review. Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively. The Knee Anterolateral Ligament is Present in 82% of North American and 65% of European But Only in 46% of Asian Studies: A Systematic Review of Frequency and Anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1