The association between passenger-vehicle front-end profiles and pedestrian injury severity in motor vehicle crashes

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.007
Wen Hu, Samuel S. Monfort, Jessica B. Cicchino
{"title":"The association between passenger-vehicle front-end profiles and pedestrian injury severity in motor vehicle crashes","authors":"Wen Hu,&nbsp;Samuel S. Monfort,&nbsp;Jessica B. Cicchino","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Vehicles play an important role in pedestrian injury risk in crashes. This study examined the association between vehicle front-end geometry and the risk of fatal pedestrian injuries in motor vehicle crashes. <em>Method:</em> A total of 17,897 police-reported crashes involving a single passenger vehicle and a single pedestrian in seven states were used in the analysis. Front-end profile parameters of vehicles (2,958 vehicle makes, series, and model years) involved in these crashes were measured from vehicle profile photos, including hood leading edge height, bumper lead angle, hood length, hood angle, and windshield angle. We defined a front-end-shape indicator based on the hood leading edge height and bumper lead angle. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the effects of these parameters on the risk that a pedestrian was fatally injured in a single-vehicle crash. <em>Results:</em> Vehicles with tall and blunt, tall and sloped, and medium-height and blunt front ends were associated with significant increases of 43.6%, 45.4%, and 25.6% in pedestrian fatality risk, respectively, when compared with low and sloped front ends. There was a significant 25.1% increase in the risk if a hood was relatively flat as defined in this study. A relatively long hood and a relatively large windshield angle were associated with 5.9% and 10.7% increases in the risk, respectively, but the increases were not significant. <em>Conclusions:</em> Vehicle front-end profiles that were significantly associated with increased pedestrian fatal injury risk were identified. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Automakers can make vehicles more pedestrian friendly by designing vehicle front ends that are lower and more sloped. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) can consider evaluations that account for the growing hood heights and blunt front ends of the vehicle fleet in the New Car Assessment Program or regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 115-127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vehicles play an important role in pedestrian injury risk in crashes. This study examined the association between vehicle front-end geometry and the risk of fatal pedestrian injuries in motor vehicle crashes. Method: A total of 17,897 police-reported crashes involving a single passenger vehicle and a single pedestrian in seven states were used in the analysis. Front-end profile parameters of vehicles (2,958 vehicle makes, series, and model years) involved in these crashes were measured from vehicle profile photos, including hood leading edge height, bumper lead angle, hood length, hood angle, and windshield angle. We defined a front-end-shape indicator based on the hood leading edge height and bumper lead angle. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the effects of these parameters on the risk that a pedestrian was fatally injured in a single-vehicle crash. Results: Vehicles with tall and blunt, tall and sloped, and medium-height and blunt front ends were associated with significant increases of 43.6%, 45.4%, and 25.6% in pedestrian fatality risk, respectively, when compared with low and sloped front ends. There was a significant 25.1% increase in the risk if a hood was relatively flat as defined in this study. A relatively long hood and a relatively large windshield angle were associated with 5.9% and 10.7% increases in the risk, respectively, but the increases were not significant. Conclusions: Vehicle front-end profiles that were significantly associated with increased pedestrian fatal injury risk were identified. Practical Applications: Automakers can make vehicles more pedestrian friendly by designing vehicle front ends that are lower and more sloped. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) can consider evaluations that account for the growing hood heights and blunt front ends of the vehicle fleet in the New Car Assessment Program or regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机动车碰撞事故中乘用车前端轮廓与行人受伤严重程度之间的关系
导言:车辆在车祸中对行人的伤害风险起着重要作用。本研究探讨了机动车碰撞事故中车辆前端几何形状与行人致命伤风险之间的关系。研究方法分析中使用了七个州警方报告的涉及单个乘用车和单个行人的共计 17,897 起碰撞事故。通过车辆轮廓照片测量了这些碰撞事故中涉及的车辆(2958 个品牌、系列和车型年份)的前端轮廓参数,包括发动机罩前缘高度、保险杠前角、发动机罩长度、发动机罩角度和挡风玻璃角度。我们根据发动机罩前缘高度和保险杠前角定义了前端形状指标。逻辑回归分析评估了这些参数对行人在单车碰撞中受致命伤风险的影响。结果显示与低矮和倾斜的前端相比,高而钝、高而倾斜和中等高度而钝的前端与行人死亡风险分别显著增加了 43.6%、45.4% 和 25.6%。根据本研究的定义,如果引擎盖相对较平,则行人死亡风险会大幅增加 25.1%。相对较长的发动机罩和相对较大的挡风玻璃角度分别会使风险增加 5.9% 和 10.7%,但增幅并不显著。结论确定了与行人致命伤害风险增加显著相关的车辆前端轮廓。实际应用:汽车制造商可以通过设计更低、更倾斜的车辆前端,使车辆对行人更友好。美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)可以考虑在新车评估计划或法规中,对日益增长的发动机罩高度和车辆钝前端进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans An evaluation of driver comprehension of the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon A systematic review of incentive schemes and their implications for truck driver safety performance Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1