Prediction and interpretation of crash severity using machine learning based on imbalanced traffic crash data

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.018
Junlan Chen , Pei Liu , Shuo Wang , Nan Zheng , Xiucheng Guo
{"title":"Prediction and interpretation of crash severity using machine learning based on imbalanced traffic crash data","authors":"Junlan Chen ,&nbsp;Pei Liu ,&nbsp;Shuo Wang ,&nbsp;Nan Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiucheng Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Predicting and interpreting crash severity is essential for developing cost-effective safety measures. Machine learning (ML) models in crash severity studies have attracted much attention recently due to their promising predicted performance. However, the limited interpretability of ML techniques is a common critique. Additionally, the inherent data imbalance in crash datasets, mainly due to a scarcity of fatal injury (FI) crashes, presents challenges for both classifiers and interpreters. <em>Method:</em> Motivated by these research needs, innovative resampling techniques and ML methods are introduced and compared to model a Washington State dataset comprising traffic crashes from 2014 to 2018. <em>Results:</em> When compared to the traditional resampling methods, the random forest model trained on the datasets synthesized by deep-learning resampling techniques demonstrates significantly improved sensitivity and G-mean performance. Furthermore, the interpretable ML approach, Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP), approach is employed to quantify the individual and interaction effects of risk factors based on the predicted results. Significant risk factors are identified, including airbag, crash type, posted speed limit and grade percentage. With the SHAP method, the individual effects and interaction effects of risk factors are explored. It is observed that roadways in rural (urban) had positive (negative) effects on the crash severity. Compared with non-FI (nFI) crashes, speed limits have more effects on FI crashes. Drivers involved in rear/front-end crashes under the influence of alcohol were more likely to be associated with FI crashes. <em>Practical Applications:</em> These findings hold significant implications for the development of precise crash modification factors for transportation departments dealing with imbalanced traffic crash data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 185-199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Predicting and interpreting crash severity is essential for developing cost-effective safety measures. Machine learning (ML) models in crash severity studies have attracted much attention recently due to their promising predicted performance. However, the limited interpretability of ML techniques is a common critique. Additionally, the inherent data imbalance in crash datasets, mainly due to a scarcity of fatal injury (FI) crashes, presents challenges for both classifiers and interpreters. Method: Motivated by these research needs, innovative resampling techniques and ML methods are introduced and compared to model a Washington State dataset comprising traffic crashes from 2014 to 2018. Results: When compared to the traditional resampling methods, the random forest model trained on the datasets synthesized by deep-learning resampling techniques demonstrates significantly improved sensitivity and G-mean performance. Furthermore, the interpretable ML approach, Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP), approach is employed to quantify the individual and interaction effects of risk factors based on the predicted results. Significant risk factors are identified, including airbag, crash type, posted speed limit and grade percentage. With the SHAP method, the individual effects and interaction effects of risk factors are explored. It is observed that roadways in rural (urban) had positive (negative) effects on the crash severity. Compared with non-FI (nFI) crashes, speed limits have more effects on FI crashes. Drivers involved in rear/front-end crashes under the influence of alcohol were more likely to be associated with FI crashes. Practical Applications: These findings hold significant implications for the development of precise crash modification factors for transportation departments dealing with imbalanced traffic crash data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于不平衡交通碰撞数据的机器学习预测和解释碰撞严重程度
预测和解释碰撞严重程度对于制定具有成本效益的安全措施至关重要。近年来,机器学习模型在碰撞严重程度研究中的应用备受关注。然而,ML技术有限的可解释性是一个常见的批评。此外,碰撞数据集中固有的数据不平衡,主要是由于致命伤害(FI)碰撞的稀缺性,对分类器和解释器都提出了挑战。方法:在这些研究需求的推动下,引入了创新的重采样技术和机器学习方法,并将其与华盛顿州2014年至2018年的交通事故数据集进行了比较。结果:与传统的重采样方法相比,在深度学习重采样技术合成的数据集上训练的随机森林模型具有显著提高的灵敏度和g均值性能。此外,采用可解释的ML方法,Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法,根据预测结果量化危险因素的个体和相互作用效应。确定了重要的风险因素,包括安全气囊、碰撞类型、张贴的速度限制和坡度百分比。运用SHAP方法,探讨了风险因素的个体效应和相互作用效应。我们观察到,农村(城市)道路对碰撞严重程度有正(负)影响。与非FI交通事故相比,限速对FI交通事故的影响更大。在酒精影响下发生前后碰撞的司机更有可能与FI碰撞有关。实际应用:这些发现对于交通部门处理不平衡交通碰撞数据时精确的碰撞修正因子的发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Towards integrated hazard assessment: Convergence of objective and subjective work environment assessments in manufacturing Do regulatory inspections make workers safer? A bibliometric performance and network analysis of red-light camera impact on signalized intersection safety How machine learning has been used to detect alcohol-induced driver impairment using in-vehicle sensors: A systematic review Adapting to renewable energy: A mixed methods exploration of safety culture and training needs in Australia’s electricity distribution industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1