Malong Qin , Wen Gao , Haiyin Wang , Shanze Yin , Jianlin Hu , Weimin Gao , Caifeng Ding
{"title":"Monoterpenoid indole alkaloids from the stem barks of Voacanga africana and their chemotaxonomic significance","authors":"Malong Qin , Wen Gao , Haiyin Wang , Shanze Yin , Jianlin Hu , Weimin Gao , Caifeng Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The phytochemical investigation of the stem barks of <em>Voacanga africana</em> resulted in the isolation of fifteen known monoterpenoid indole alkaloids (<strong>1</strong>–<strong>15</strong>). The structures of the alkaloids were determined by comparison of their physical and spectroscopic data with those reported in literature. Twelve of these metabolites (<strong>4</strong>–<strong>15</strong>) were previously unreported within the genus <em>Voacanga</em>, thus they can serve as chemotaxonomic markers for <em>V. africana</em> to differentiate between <em>V. africana</em> from other species of the genus <em>Voacanga</em>. The alkaloids 3-oxoconopharyngine (<strong>6</strong>), ervahainanmine (<strong>10</strong>), crassanine (<strong>14</strong>) and conolobine A (<strong>15</strong>) hold the potential to serve as chemical markers for distinguishing <em>V. africana</em> from other family species. Furthermore, compounds <strong>3</strong>, <strong>6</strong>, <strong>10</strong>, <strong>12</strong> showed potential antimicrobial activities against <em>Candida albicans</em> and <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> with MIC values of 6.25–12.50 μg/mL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 104863"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The phytochemical investigation of the stem barks of Voacanga africana resulted in the isolation of fifteen known monoterpenoid indole alkaloids (1–15). The structures of the alkaloids were determined by comparison of their physical and spectroscopic data with those reported in literature. Twelve of these metabolites (4–15) were previously unreported within the genus Voacanga, thus they can serve as chemotaxonomic markers for V. africana to differentiate between V. africana from other species of the genus Voacanga. The alkaloids 3-oxoconopharyngine (6), ervahainanmine (10), crassanine (14) and conolobine A (15) hold the potential to serve as chemical markers for distinguishing V. africana from other family species. Furthermore, compounds 3, 6, 10, 12 showed potential antimicrobial activities against Candida albicans and Bacillus subtilis with MIC values of 6.25–12.50 μg/mL.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.