Can an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Smartphone App Help Individuals with Mental Health Disorders Quit Smoking?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1155/2024/1055801
Margarita Santiago-Torres, Kristin E. Mull, Brianna M. Sullivan, Judith J. Prochaska, Michael J. Zvolensky, Jonathan B. Bricker
{"title":"Can an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Smartphone App Help Individuals with Mental Health Disorders Quit Smoking?","authors":"Margarita Santiago-Torres,&nbsp;Kristin E. Mull,&nbsp;Brianna M. Sullivan,&nbsp;Judith J. Prochaska,&nbsp;Michael J. Zvolensky,&nbsp;Jonathan B. Bricker","doi":"10.1155/2024/1055801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Individuals with mental health disorders face major barriers in accessing smoking cessation care, often due to the stigmas associated with mental disorders and addiction. Consequently, accessible population-based smoking cessation interventions are needed for this vulnerable group. <i>Objective</i>. This secondary analysis utilized data from a 12-month randomized trial to examine whether an acceptance and commitment therapy-based app (iCanQuit) demonstrated greater efficacy, engagement, and satisfaction compared to a United States (US) Clinical Practice Guidelines-based app (QuitGuide) in helping adults with mental health disorders quit smoking. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Participants self-reported having bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, or screened positive for depression, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, or social anxiety. We compared the primary outcome of self-reported 30-day cigarette abstinence at 12 months between iCanQuit (<i>n</i> = 770) and QuitGuide (<i>n</i> = 785) using complete-case and multiple imputation analyses and compared engagement and satisfaction between arms. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine whether the intervention apps functioned by reinforcing hypothesized mechanisms of action, namely, acceptance of triggers to smoke and through app engagement. <i>Results</i>. Participants represented all 50 US states and had 30.2% non-White or Hispanic backgrounds. Among participants with any mental health disorder, iCanQuit demonstrated higher 30-day cigarette abstinence than QuitGuide at 12 months (complete-case: 24.4% vs. 20.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.04; multiple imputation: 24.6% vs. 20.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). A comparable effect size was observed in iCanQuit participants with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia compared to QuitGuide, albeit not statistically significant (multiple imputation: 27.1% vs. 20.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.06). iCanQuit’s cessation efficacy was mediated by acceptance of emotions triggering smoking (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and app engagement (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). iCanQuit was more satisfying than QuitGuide (88.5% vs. 77.2%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. In the largest known study of ACT for smoking cessation among adults with mental health disorders, the smoking cessation, engagement, and satisfaction outcomes were all significantly greater with iCanQuit than QuitGuide. Acceptance of emotions triggering smoking and iCanQuit app engagement were important mechanisms of efficacy. This trial is registered with NCT02724462.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1055801","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1055801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Individuals with mental health disorders face major barriers in accessing smoking cessation care, often due to the stigmas associated with mental disorders and addiction. Consequently, accessible population-based smoking cessation interventions are needed for this vulnerable group. Objective. This secondary analysis utilized data from a 12-month randomized trial to examine whether an acceptance and commitment therapy-based app (iCanQuit) demonstrated greater efficacy, engagement, and satisfaction compared to a United States (US) Clinical Practice Guidelines-based app (QuitGuide) in helping adults with mental health disorders quit smoking. Materials and Methods. Participants self-reported having bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, or screened positive for depression, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, or social anxiety. We compared the primary outcome of self-reported 30-day cigarette abstinence at 12 months between iCanQuit (n = 770) and QuitGuide (n = 785) using complete-case and multiple imputation analyses and compared engagement and satisfaction between arms. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine whether the intervention apps functioned by reinforcing hypothesized mechanisms of action, namely, acceptance of triggers to smoke and through app engagement. Results. Participants represented all 50 US states and had 30.2% non-White or Hispanic backgrounds. Among participants with any mental health disorder, iCanQuit demonstrated higher 30-day cigarette abstinence than QuitGuide at 12 months (complete-case: 24.4% vs. 20.4%, P = 0.04; multiple imputation: 24.6% vs. 20.4%, P = 0.04). A comparable effect size was observed in iCanQuit participants with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia compared to QuitGuide, albeit not statistically significant (multiple imputation: 27.1% vs. 20.9%; P = 0.06). iCanQuit’s cessation efficacy was mediated by acceptance of emotions triggering smoking (P < 0.001) and app engagement (P < 0.001). iCanQuit was more satisfying than QuitGuide (88.5% vs. 77.2%; P < 0.001). Conclusions. In the largest known study of ACT for smoking cessation among adults with mental health disorders, the smoking cessation, engagement, and satisfaction outcomes were all significantly greater with iCanQuit than QuitGuide. Acceptance of emotions triggering smoking and iCanQuit app engagement were important mechanisms of efficacy. This trial is registered with NCT02724462.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于接受与承诺疗法的智能手机应用程序能否帮助精神疾病患者戒烟?
背景。精神障碍患者在获得戒烟治疗方面面临着巨大障碍,这通常是由于精神障碍和成瘾所带来的耻辱感所致。因此,需要为这一弱势群体提供基于人群的无障碍戒烟干预。目标。这项二次分析利用了一项为期 12 个月的随机试验的数据,以研究与基于美国临床实践指南的应用程序(QuitGuide)相比,基于接受和承诺疗法的应用程序(iCanQuit)在帮助患有精神障碍的成年人戒烟方面是否表现出更高的有效性、参与度和满意度。材料与方法。参与者自述患有双相情感障碍或精神分裂症,或筛查出抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症、恐慌症、创伤后应激障碍或社交焦虑症。我们使用完整病例分析和多重归因分析比较了 iCanQuit(n = 770)和 QuitGuide(n = 785)两种戒烟方法在 12 个月内自我报告的 30 天戒烟率这一主要结果,并比较了两种戒烟方法的参与度和满意度。我们还进行了中介分析,以研究干预应用程序是否通过强化假设的作用机制(即接受吸烟诱因和通过应用程序参与)来发挥作用。结果。参与者来自美国 50 个州,30.2% 为非白人或西班牙裔。在患有任何精神疾病的参与者中,iCanQuit 在 12 个月内的 30 天戒烟率高于 QuitGuide(完整案例:24.4% 对 20.4%,P = 0.04;多重估算:24.6% 对 20.4%,P = 0.04)。与 QuitGuide 相比,在患有双相情感障碍或精神分裂症的 iCanQuit 参与者中观察到了类似的效果,尽管在统计学上并不显著(多重估算:27.1% vs. 20.9%;P = 0.06)。iCanQuit的戒烟效果受接受引发吸烟的情绪(P <0.001)和应用程序参与度(P <0.001)的影响。iCanQuit比QuitGuide更令人满意(88.5% vs. 77.2%; P <0.001)。结论。在已知规模最大的针对有心理健康障碍的成年人的戒烟 ACT 研究中,iCanQuit 的戒烟率、参与度和满意度都明显高于 QuitGuide。接受引发吸烟的情绪和 iCanQuit 应用程序的参与度是重要的疗效机制。该试验已在 NCT02724462 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional–Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer Associations of Changes in Alcohol Consumption on the Risk of Depression/Suicide Among Initial Nondrinkers Effectiveness of a Saffron and Withania Supplement on Mood in Women With Mild-to-Moderate Anxiety During the COVID-19 Lockdown Correlation Between Anxiety and Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Microwave Ablation The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1