Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z
Jiayin Zhou, Jie Hao, Mingkun Tang, Haixia Sun, Jiayang Wang, Jiao Li, Qing Qian
{"title":"Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction.","authors":"Jiayin Zhou, Jie Hao, Mingkun Tang, Haixia Sun, Jiayang Wang, Jiao Li, Qing Qian","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative index system for evaluating the data quality of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in disease risk prediction using Machine Learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The index system was developed in four steps: (1) a preliminary index system was outlined based on literature review; (2) we utilized the Delphi method to structure the indicators at all levels; (3) the weights of these indicators were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method; and (4) the developed index system was empirically validated using real-world EMR data in a ML-based disease risk prediction task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of review findings and the expert consultations led to the formulation of a three-level index system with four first-level, 11 second-level, and 33 third-level indicators. The weights of these indicators were obtained through the AHP method. Results from the empirical analysis illustrated a positive relationship between the scores assigned by the proposed index system and the predictive performances of the datasets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed index system for evaluating EMR data quality is grounded in extensive literature analysis and expert consultation. Moreover, the system's high reliability and suitability has been affirmed through empirical validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel index system offers a robust framework for assessing the quality and suitability of EMR data in ML-based disease risk predictions. It can serve as a guide in building EMR databases, improving EMR data quality control, and generating reliable real-world evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative index system for evaluating the data quality of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in disease risk prediction using Machine Learning (ML).

Materials and methods: The index system was developed in four steps: (1) a preliminary index system was outlined based on literature review; (2) we utilized the Delphi method to structure the indicators at all levels; (3) the weights of these indicators were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method; and (4) the developed index system was empirically validated using real-world EMR data in a ML-based disease risk prediction task.

Results: The synthesis of review findings and the expert consultations led to the formulation of a three-level index system with four first-level, 11 second-level, and 33 third-level indicators. The weights of these indicators were obtained through the AHP method. Results from the empirical analysis illustrated a positive relationship between the scores assigned by the proposed index system and the predictive performances of the datasets.

Discussion: The proposed index system for evaluating EMR data quality is grounded in extensive literature analysis and expert consultation. Moreover, the system's high reliability and suitability has been affirmed through empirical validation.

Conclusion: The novel index system offers a robust framework for assessing the quality and suitability of EMR data in ML-based disease risk predictions. It can serve as a guide in building EMR databases, improving EMR data quality control, and generating reliable real-world evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发用于评估疾病风险智能预测中电子病历质量的量化指标体系。
目的:本研究旨在利用机器学习(ML)技术开发并验证一个用于评估疾病风险预测中电子病历(EMR)数据质量的量化指标体系:本研究旨在利用机器学习(ML)技术,开发并验证一套用于评估电子病历(EMR)中疾病风险预测数据质量的定量指标体系:该指标体系的开发分为四个步骤:(1) 根据文献综述勾勒出初步指标体系;(2) 利用德尔菲法构建各级指标;(3) 利用层次分析法(AHP)确定这些指标的权重;(4) 在基于机器学习的疾病风险预测任务中,利用真实世界的电子病历数据对所开发的指标体系进行实证验证:综合综述结果和专家咨询意见,制定了一个三级指标体系,包括 4 个一级指标、11 个二级指标和 33 个三级指标。这些指标的权重通过 AHP 方法获得。实证分析的结果表明,建议的指标体系分配的分数与数据集的预测性能之间存在正相关关系:所提出的 EMR 数据质量评估指标体系建立在广泛的文献分析和专家咨询基础之上。此外,该系统的高可靠性和适用性已通过实证验证得到确认:结论:新的指标体系为评估基于 ML 的疾病风险预测中 EMR 数据的质量和适用性提供了一个稳健的框架。它可以作为建立 EMR 数据库、改进 EMR 数据质量控制和生成可靠的真实世界证据的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1