Intriguing connection between diminished ovarian reserve and childhood traumatic experiences, a prospective case-control study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102817
{"title":"Intriguing connection between diminished ovarian reserve and childhood traumatic experiences, a prospective case-control study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) presents a complex challenge in the field of infertility, with factors like age and genetics traditionally under scrutiny. However, the potential influence of adverse childhood experiences on ovarian reserve remains a relatively unexplored area. This research aims to contribute novel insights to the understanding of diminished ovarian reserve etiology, shedding light on previously unexplored risk factors and their potential implications.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This case-control study was conducted at an Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Center of a university hospital. Infertile patients admitted to the ART center were enrolled in the study. The case group consisted of 102 infertile women diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve, and the control group consisted of 103 healthy women with male factor infertility. An interview lasting approximately 30 min was held in a separate room with those who volunteered to participate in the study. Due to the sensitivity of the research subject, the data was collected anonymously. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was used to measure adverse childhood experiences, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess anxiety and depression in the study. The results were compared between the case and the control groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, the total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and all subscale scores were higher in the case group (38.28 ± 9.86) than in the control group (35.10 ± 9.52). According to HADS, the total score was 15.92 ± 7.98 in the case group and 14.22 ± 6.87 in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our pioneering study is designed to investigate a previously unexplored risk factor in low ovarian reserve. Considering our data and other studies in the literature examining childhood traumas as a risk, it makes us think that the issue is worth examining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 9","pages":"Article 102817"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) presents a complex challenge in the field of infertility, with factors like age and genetics traditionally under scrutiny. However, the potential influence of adverse childhood experiences on ovarian reserve remains a relatively unexplored area. This research aims to contribute novel insights to the understanding of diminished ovarian reserve etiology, shedding light on previously unexplored risk factors and their potential implications.

Design

This case-control study was conducted at an Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Center of a university hospital. Infertile patients admitted to the ART center were enrolled in the study. The case group consisted of 102 infertile women diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve, and the control group consisted of 103 healthy women with male factor infertility. An interview lasting approximately 30 min was held in a separate room with those who volunteered to participate in the study. Due to the sensitivity of the research subject, the data was collected anonymously. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was used to measure adverse childhood experiences, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess anxiety and depression in the study. The results were compared between the case and the control groups.

Results

Overall, the total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and all subscale scores were higher in the case group (38.28 ± 9.86) than in the control group (35.10 ± 9.52). According to HADS, the total score was 15.92 ± 7.98 in the case group and 14.22 ± 6.87 in the control group.

Conclusions

Our pioneering study is designed to investigate a previously unexplored risk factor in low ovarian reserve. Considering our data and other studies in the literature examining childhood traumas as a risk, it makes us think that the issue is worth examining.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性病例对照研究发现,卵巢储备功能减退与童年创伤经历之间存在耐人寻味的联系。
简介卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)是不孕症领域面临的一项复杂挑战,年龄和遗传等因素历来受到关注。然而,童年的不良经历对卵巢储备功能的潜在影响仍是一个相对尚未探索的领域。本研究旨在为了解卵巢储备功能减退的病因提供新的见解,揭示以前未探索的风险因素及其潜在影响:本病例对照研究在一所大学医院的辅助生殖技术(ART)中心进行。研究对象为该辅助生殖技术中心收治的不育患者。病例组包括 102 名被诊断为卵巢储备功能减退的不孕妇女,对照组包括 103 名患有男性因素不孕症的健康妇女。研究人员在一个单独的房间与自愿参与研究的女性进行了约 30 分钟的访谈。由于研究对象的敏感性,这些数据都是匿名收集的。童年创伤问卷用于测量童年的不良经历,医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)用于评估研究中的焦虑和抑郁。研究结果在病例组和对照组之间进行了比较:总体而言,病例组儿童创伤问卷总分和所有分量表得分(38.28±9.86)均高于对照组(35.10±9.52)。根据 HADS,病例组的总分为(15.92±7.98)分,对照组为(14.22±6.87)分:我们的开创性研究旨在调查卵巢储备功能低下的一个前所未探的风险因素。考虑到我们的数据和其他文献中关于童年创伤风险的研究,我们认为这个问题值得研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1