High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102888
Zahra Jamalpour , Somayeh Ghaderi , Mostafa Fathian-Kolahkaj
{"title":"High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers","authors":"Zahra Jamalpour ,&nbsp;Somayeh Ghaderi ,&nbsp;Mostafa Fathian-Kolahkaj","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Early detection improves prognosis, but current diagnostic tools still need improvement. We aimed to identify high-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer using cluster analysis of age and tumor marker data.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A secondary dataset analysis was conducted using unsupervised learning techniques. Data were from a University Hospital, originally collected between July 2011 and July 2018 in Taiwan. In total, 349 women diagnosed with ovarian masses, including both benign and malignant tumors, were included in this analysis. The median age was 45 years, and 49 % were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in pathology. We used a hierarchical clustering algorithm to find groups of patients with similar features.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two clusters were identified (<em>N</em> = 204 and 145), with a high-risk cluster (66.2 % malignancy) characterized by significantly older age, higher CA125, HE4, CEA, and AFP levels, and a lower CA19–9 level than the low-risk cluster (24.8 % malignancy). The assessment of clustering stability and internal validity yielded a figure of merit score of 0.970 and a silhouette coefficient of 0.524. A classification model using age, CA125, HE4, and CA19–9 demonstrated high accuracy (89.4 %), sensitivity (94.5 %), specificity (83.7 %), and a large area under the curve (89.1 %) for the risk stratification.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Integrating tumor markers with patient demographics improved the differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses. This approach can help clinicians prioritize high-risk patients for further diagnostic evaluation and reduce unnecessary invasive procedures for low-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Early detection improves prognosis, but current diagnostic tools still need improvement. We aimed to identify high-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer using cluster analysis of age and tumor marker data.

Material and methods

A secondary dataset analysis was conducted using unsupervised learning techniques. Data were from a University Hospital, originally collected between July 2011 and July 2018 in Taiwan. In total, 349 women diagnosed with ovarian masses, including both benign and malignant tumors, were included in this analysis. The median age was 45 years, and 49 % were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in pathology. We used a hierarchical clustering algorithm to find groups of patients with similar features.

Results

Two clusters were identified (N = 204 and 145), with a high-risk cluster (66.2 % malignancy) characterized by significantly older age, higher CA125, HE4, CEA, and AFP levels, and a lower CA19–9 level than the low-risk cluster (24.8 % malignancy). The assessment of clustering stability and internal validity yielded a figure of merit score of 0.970 and a silhouette coefficient of 0.524. A classification model using age, CA125, HE4, and CA19–9 demonstrated high accuracy (89.4 %), sensitivity (94.5 %), specificity (83.7 %), and a large area under the curve (89.1 %) for the risk stratification.

Conclusion

Integrating tumor markers with patient demographics improved the differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses. This approach can help clinicians prioritize high-risk patients for further diagnostic evaluation and reduce unnecessary invasive procedures for low-risk patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢癌高危患者概况:肿瘤标志物聚类分析的新方法
目的:卵巢癌仍然是妇女癌症相关死亡的主要原因。早期发现可改善预后,但目前的诊断工具仍需改进。我们的目的是通过年龄和肿瘤标志物数据的聚类分析来确定卵巢癌的高危患者概况。材料和方法:使用无监督学习技术进行二次数据集分析。数据来自台湾一家大学医院,最初于2011年7月至2018年7月收集。总共有349名被诊断为卵巢肿块的女性,包括良性和恶性肿瘤,被纳入该分析。中位年龄为45岁,49%的患者病理诊断为卵巢癌。我们使用分层聚类算法来寻找具有相似特征的患者组。结果:鉴定出2个聚类(N = 204和145),其中高危聚类(66.2%为恶性)的特点是年龄较大,CA125、HE4、CEA和AFP水平较高,CA19-9水平低于低危聚类(24.8%为恶性)。聚类稳定性和内部效度评价的优值得分为0.970,剪影系数为0.524。使用年龄、CA125、HE4和CA19-9的分类模型对风险分层具有较高的准确率(89.4%)、敏感性(94.5%)、特异性(83.7%)和较大的曲线下面积(89.1%)。结论:将肿瘤标志物与患者人口统计学相结合可提高卵巢良恶性肿块的鉴别。这种方法可以帮助临床医生优先考虑高风险患者进行进一步的诊断评估,并减少对低风险患者不必要的侵入性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1