Children's voices on their values and moral dilemmas when being cared and treated for cancer- a qualitative interview study.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01075-3
Charlotte Weiner, Pernilla Pergert, Anders Castor, Bert Molewijk, Cecilia Bartholdson
{"title":"Children's voices on their values and moral dilemmas when being cared and treated for cancer- a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Charlotte Weiner, Pernilla Pergert, Anders Castor, Bert Molewijk, Cecilia Bartholdson","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01075-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood cancers affect about 350 children every year in Sweden and are life-threatening diseases. During the treatment period, situations arise that can become morally challenging for the child. When knowing children's values and morally challenging situations in childhood cancer care, targeted ethics support could be developed and used in care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore children's values and moral dilemmas ​​when undergoing cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study based on empirical data. The data collection was conducted through three focus group interviews and six individual interviews with children between 10 and 18 years (n = 16). A content analysis methodology was used to generate themes. Children who were/have been treated for cancer at three childhood cancer centres in Sweden were invited to participate. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The children's participation was based on voluntariness and consent/assent.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During the analysis, five themes of values emerged: Personal relationships, Bodily ease and identity, Feeling in control and being involved, Positive distractions and Right care that is needed. Their moral dilemmas were thematized into: Should I consider others or not? Should I rest or not? and Should I refuse treatment or not?</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children undergoing cancer treatment want to have personal relationships with healthcare professionals. Their moral dilemmas were about questioning their own physical and psychological well-being against their expectations, the values of others and the treatment required. Further research is needed to understand how to deal with moral dilemmas in children undergoing cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01075-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancers affect about 350 children every year in Sweden and are life-threatening diseases. During the treatment period, situations arise that can become morally challenging for the child. When knowing children's values and morally challenging situations in childhood cancer care, targeted ethics support could be developed and used in care.

Aim: To explore children's values and moral dilemmas ​​when undergoing cancer treatment.

Methods: This is a qualitative study based on empirical data. The data collection was conducted through three focus group interviews and six individual interviews with children between 10 and 18 years (n = 16). A content analysis methodology was used to generate themes. Children who were/have been treated for cancer at three childhood cancer centres in Sweden were invited to participate. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The children's participation was based on voluntariness and consent/assent.

Findings: During the analysis, five themes of values emerged: Personal relationships, Bodily ease and identity, Feeling in control and being involved, Positive distractions and Right care that is needed. Their moral dilemmas were thematized into: Should I consider others or not? Should I rest or not? and Should I refuse treatment or not?

Conclusion: Children undergoing cancer treatment want to have personal relationships with healthcare professionals. Their moral dilemmas were about questioning their own physical and psychological well-being against their expectations, the values of others and the treatment required. Further research is needed to understand how to deal with moral dilemmas in children undergoing cancer treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童在接受癌症护理和治疗时对其价值观和道德困境的看法--定性访谈研究。
背景:在瑞典,每年约有 350 名儿童罹患儿童癌症,这是一种危及生命的疾病。在治疗期间,可能会出现对儿童来说具有道德挑战性的情况。如果了解儿童的价值观和儿童癌症护理中的道德挑战情况,就可以在护理中开发和使用有针对性的道德支持。目的:探讨儿童在接受癌症治疗时的价值观和道德困境:这是一项基于经验数据的定性研究。数据收集通过三次焦点小组访谈和六次个人访谈进行,访谈对象为 10 至 18 岁的儿童(n = 16)。研究采用内容分析法生成主题。瑞典三家儿童癌症中心邀请了正在/曾经接受癌症治疗的儿童参与。该研究获得了瑞典伦理审查机构的批准。儿童的参与以自愿和同意/同意为基础:在分析过程中,出现了五个价值观主题:人际关系、身体自在和身份认同、控制感和参与感、积极的分心和所需的正确护理。他们的道德困境主题化为:我是否应该考虑他人?我是否应该考虑他人?我是否应该休息? 我是否应该拒绝治疗?接受癌症治疗的儿童希望与医护人员建立个人关系。他们的道德困境是质疑自己的身心健康与自己的期望、他人的价值观和所需治疗之间的矛盾。需要进一步开展研究,以了解如何处理接受癌症治疗的儿童的道德困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
A case study of Muslims' perspectives of expanded terminal sedation:addressing the elephant in the room. Ethical issues in vaccine trial participation by adolescents: qualitative insights on family decision making from a human papillomavirus vaccine trial in Tanzania. Scoping review and thematic analysis of informed consent in humanitarian emergencies. Healthcare workers' opinions on non-medical criteria for prioritisation of access to care during the pandemic. "I think all of us should have […] much better training in ethics." Ethical challenges in policy making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from an interview study with Swiss policy makers and scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1