A scoping review of human genetic resources management policies and databases in high- and middle-low-income countries.

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1186/s12910-025-01192-7
Hongwei Liu, Yin Liu, Yanyan Zhao, Yingqi Ma, Qiong Chen, Huifang Xu, Xiaoyang Wang, Xiaoli Guo, Hong Wang, Zelong Chen, Shaokai Zhang, Binbin Han
{"title":"A scoping review of human genetic resources management policies and databases in high- and middle-low-income countries.","authors":"Hongwei Liu, Yin Liu, Yanyan Zhao, Yingqi Ma, Qiong Chen, Huifang Xu, Xiaoyang Wang, Xiaoli Guo, Hong Wang, Zelong Chen, Shaokai Zhang, Binbin Han","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01192-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review examines global human genetic resources management, focusing on genetic data policies and repositories in high- and middle-low-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including official government websites and Google, to gather relevant literature on human genetic resources management policies and genetic resource databases. Documents were screened for relevance, focusing on high-income countries (United States, United Kingdom, Japan) and middle-low-income countries (China, India, Kenya). Data were extracted, coded, and analyzed to identify common themes and differences in genetic resource management practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-income countries benefit from robust legal frameworks and advanced technological infrastructures. The United States enforces the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act to protect privacy and facilitate data sharing, while Japan relies on the Act on the Protection of Personal Information and ethical guidelines. Additionally, high-income countries host a variety of genetic databases and biobanks that support scientific research. In contrast, middle-low-income countries like China, India, and Kenya are still developing their frameworks. China has regulations such as the Biosecurity Law and the Regulations on the Management of Human Genetic Resources, but still requires more unified standards. India's policies focus on genetic research and data protection through the Biological Diversity Act, while Kenya seeks to improve data management through the 2019 Data Protection Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant disparities exist in human genetic resources management between high-income and middle-low-income countries. High-income countries have robust systems balancing privacy protection with research facilitation, supported by comprehensive and large-scale databases for scientific research. Middle-low-income countries need to enhance legal frameworks and build population-specific databases. Promoting equitable data sharing and adopting best practices from high-income countries are essential for advancing global scientific discovery and ensuring fair management of genetic resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01192-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This review examines global human genetic resources management, focusing on genetic data policies and repositories in high- and middle-low-income countries.

Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including official government websites and Google, to gather relevant literature on human genetic resources management policies and genetic resource databases. Documents were screened for relevance, focusing on high-income countries (United States, United Kingdom, Japan) and middle-low-income countries (China, India, Kenya). Data were extracted, coded, and analyzed to identify common themes and differences in genetic resource management practices.

Results: High-income countries benefit from robust legal frameworks and advanced technological infrastructures. The United States enforces the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act to protect privacy and facilitate data sharing, while Japan relies on the Act on the Protection of Personal Information and ethical guidelines. Additionally, high-income countries host a variety of genetic databases and biobanks that support scientific research. In contrast, middle-low-income countries like China, India, and Kenya are still developing their frameworks. China has regulations such as the Biosecurity Law and the Regulations on the Management of Human Genetic Resources, but still requires more unified standards. India's policies focus on genetic research and data protection through the Biological Diversity Act, while Kenya seeks to improve data management through the 2019 Data Protection Act.

Conclusion: Significant disparities exist in human genetic resources management between high-income and middle-low-income countries. High-income countries have robust systems balancing privacy protection with research facilitation, supported by comprehensive and large-scale databases for scientific research. Middle-low-income countries need to enhance legal frameworks and build population-specific databases. Promoting equitable data sharing and adopting best practices from high-income countries are essential for advancing global scientific discovery and ensuring fair management of genetic resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高、中低收入国家人类遗传资源管理政策和数据库的范围审查。
背景:本文综述了全球人类遗传资源管理,重点是高、中低收入国家的遗传数据政策和存储库。方法:采用综合检索策略,在政府官方网站和谷歌等多个数据库中收集人类遗传资源管理政策和遗传资源数据库的相关文献。对文件进行相关性筛选,重点关注高收入国家(美国、英国、日本)和中低收入国家(中国、印度、肯尼亚)。对数据进行提取、编码和分析,以确定遗传资源管理实践中的共同主题和差异。结果:高收入国家受益于健全的法律框架和先进的技术基础设施。美国执行《健康保险流通与责任法》和《遗传信息非歧视法》,以保护隐私和促进数据共享,而日本则依靠《个人信息保护法》和道德准则。此外,高收入国家拥有支持科学研究的各种遗传数据库和生物库。相比之下,中国、印度和肯尼亚等中低收入国家仍在发展自己的框架。中国有《生物安全法》和《人类遗传资源管理条例》等法规,但仍需要更统一的标准。印度的政策重点是通过《生物多样性法》进行基因研究和数据保护,而肯尼亚则试图通过2019年《数据保护法》改善数据管理。结论:高收入国家与中低收入国家在人类遗传资源管理方面存在显著差异。高收入国家拥有平衡隐私保护与促进研究的健全系统,并得到全面和大规模科学研究数据库的支持。中低收入国家需要加强法律框架,建立针对特定人群的数据库。促进公平的数据共享和采用高收入国家的最佳做法对于推动全球科学发现和确保公平管理遗传资源至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Between culture and care: nurses' experiences of end-of-life communication in Ghana. Ethics and regulatory guidance to address the challenges encountered in research on rare diseases in a multinational dimension: the experience of a European funded programme. Gender differences in attitudes towards abortion: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye. AI ethics in Indian healthcare: a scoping review of national and international guidelines on privacy, data protection, and security. Justice, Disability, and Law: A Neurological and Ethical Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis in Turkey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1