Watch and Wait in Rectal Cancer Patients with Residual Mucin on MRI following Neoadjuvant Therapy

Sean J Judge, Parisa Malekzadeh, Marina J Corines, Marc J Gollub, Natally Horvat, Mithat Gonen, Leonard Saltz, Andrea Cercek, Paul Romesser, Christopher Crane, Jinru Shia, Iris Wei, Maria Widmar, Emmanouil Pappou, Garrett M Nash, J Joshua Smith, Philip B Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Martin R Weiser
{"title":"Watch and Wait in Rectal Cancer Patients with Residual Mucin on MRI following Neoadjuvant Therapy","authors":"Sean J Judge, Parisa Malekzadeh, Marina J Corines, Marc J Gollub, Natally Horvat, Mithat Gonen, Leonard Saltz, Andrea Cercek, Paul Romesser, Christopher Crane, Jinru Shia, Iris Wei, Maria Widmar, Emmanouil Pappou, Garrett M Nash, J Joshua Smith, Philip B Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Martin R Weiser","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) leads to a clinical complete response (cCR) in a significant proportion of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), allowing for possible nonoperative management. The presence of mucin on MRI after NAT leads to uncertainty about residual disease and appropriateness of a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy in patients with no evidence of disease on proctoscopy (endoscopic cCR). Methods MRI reports for LARC patients seen between July 2016 and January 2020 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were queried for presence of mucin in the tumor bed on MRI following NAT. Clinicodemographic, pathologic, and outcome data were compiled and analyzed. Results Of 71 patients with mucin on post-treatment MRI, 20 had a cCR and 51 had abnormalities on endoscopy and/or physical exam. One patient with a cCR opted out of WW; thus, 19 patients (27%) entered WW and 52 patients (73%) were planned for surgery (Non-WW). Of the 19 WW patients, 15 (79%) have had no local regrowth with median follow-up of 50 months (range, 29-76 months), while 4 (21%) experienced regrowth between 9 and 29 months after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 52 patients who were planned to have surgery (Non-WW), 49 underwent resection while 3 developed metastatic disease that precluded curative-intent surgery. Five (10%) of the 49 patients who underwent surgery, including the one with an endoscopic cCR, had a pathologic complete response. Conclusions The presence of mucin after NAT for LARC does not preclude WW management in otherwise appropriate candidates who achieve an endoscopic cCR.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) leads to a clinical complete response (cCR) in a significant proportion of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), allowing for possible nonoperative management. The presence of mucin on MRI after NAT leads to uncertainty about residual disease and appropriateness of a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy in patients with no evidence of disease on proctoscopy (endoscopic cCR). Methods MRI reports for LARC patients seen between July 2016 and January 2020 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were queried for presence of mucin in the tumor bed on MRI following NAT. Clinicodemographic, pathologic, and outcome data were compiled and analyzed. Results Of 71 patients with mucin on post-treatment MRI, 20 had a cCR and 51 had abnormalities on endoscopy and/or physical exam. One patient with a cCR opted out of WW; thus, 19 patients (27%) entered WW and 52 patients (73%) were planned for surgery (Non-WW). Of the 19 WW patients, 15 (79%) have had no local regrowth with median follow-up of 50 months (range, 29-76 months), while 4 (21%) experienced regrowth between 9 and 29 months after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 52 patients who were planned to have surgery (Non-WW), 49 underwent resection while 3 developed metastatic disease that precluded curative-intent surgery. Five (10%) of the 49 patients who underwent surgery, including the one with an endoscopic cCR, had a pathologic complete response. Conclusions The presence of mucin after NAT for LARC does not preclude WW management in otherwise appropriate candidates who achieve an endoscopic cCR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助治疗后核磁共振成像出现残留黏蛋白的直肠癌患者的观察与等待
背景 新辅助治疗(NAT)可使相当一部分局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者获得临床完全反应(cCR),从而使非手术治疗成为可能。NAT 后核磁共振成像上出现的粘蛋白会导致对残留疾病的不确定性,以及对直肠镜检查无疾病证据(内镜 cCR)的患者采取观察和等待(WW)策略的适当性。方法 对2016年7月至2020年1月期间在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心就诊的LARC患者的MRI报告进行查询,以了解NAT后MRI上肿瘤床是否存在粘蛋白。汇总并分析了临床人口学、病理学和结果数据。结果 在治疗后核磁共振成像检查出粘蛋白的 71 例患者中,20 例有 cCR,51 例在内窥镜检查和/或体格检查中出现异常。一名有 cCR 的患者选择放弃 WW;因此,19 名患者(27%)进入 WW,52 名患者(73%)计划接受手术(非 WW)。在19名WW患者中,15名(79%)在50个月(29-76个月)的中位随访中未出现局部再生,4名(21%)在新辅助治疗后9-29个月之间出现再生。在计划进行手术(非战斗)的 52 名患者中,49 人接受了切除手术,3 人出现转移性疾病,无法进行根治性手术。在接受手术的 49 名患者中,有 5 名(10%)患者(包括一名内镜下 cCR 患者)获得了病理完全反应。结论 LARC NAT 术后出现粘蛋白并不妨碍对获得内镜 cCR 的合适患者进行 WW 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1