Agreement of medical record abstraction and self-report of breast cancer treatment with an extended recall window.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35459
Anne S Reiner, Julia A Knight, Esther M John, Charles F Lynch, Kathleen E Malone, Xiaolin Liang, Meghan Woods, James C Root, Jonine L Bernstein
{"title":"Agreement of medical record abstraction and self-report of breast cancer treatment with an extended recall window.","authors":"Anne S Reiner, Julia A Knight, Esther M John, Charles F Lynch, Kathleen E Malone, Xiaolin Liang, Meghan Woods, James C Root, Jonine L Bernstein","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical record abstraction (MRA) and self-report questionnaires are two methods frequently used to ascertain cancer treatment information. Prior studies have shown excellent agreement between MRA and self-report, but it is unknown how a recall window longer than 3 years may affect this agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study is a multicenter, population-based case-control study of controls with unilateral breast cancer individually matched to cases with contralateral breast cancer. Participants who were diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer from 1985 to 2008 before the age of 55 years completed a questionnaire that included questions on treatment. First primary breast cancer treatment information was abstracted from the medical record from radiation oncology clinic notes for radiation treatment and from systemic adjuvant treatment reports for hormone therapy and chemotherapy. Agreement between MRA and self-reported treatment was assessed with the kappa statistic and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2808 participants with MRA and self-reported chemotherapy treatment information, 2733 participants with MRA and self-reported hormone therapy information, and 2905 participants with MRA and self-reported radiation treatment information were identified. The median recall window was 12.5 years (range, 2.8-22.2 years). MRA and self-reported treatment agreement was excellent across treatment modalities (kappa<sub>chemo</sub>, 98.5; 95% CI, 97.9-99.2; kappa<sub>horm</sub>, 87.7; 95% CI, 85.9-89.5; kappa<sub>rad</sub>, 97.9; 95% CI, 97.0-98.7). There was no heterogeneity across recall windows (p<sub>chemo</sub> = .46; p<sub>horm</sub> = .40; p<sub>rad</sub> = .61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agreement between self-reported and MRA primary breast cancer treatment modality information was excellent for young women diagnosed with breast cancer and was maintained even among women whose recall window was more than 20 years after diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e35459"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical record abstraction (MRA) and self-report questionnaires are two methods frequently used to ascertain cancer treatment information. Prior studies have shown excellent agreement between MRA and self-report, but it is unknown how a recall window longer than 3 years may affect this agreement.

Methods: The Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study is a multicenter, population-based case-control study of controls with unilateral breast cancer individually matched to cases with contralateral breast cancer. Participants who were diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer from 1985 to 2008 before the age of 55 years completed a questionnaire that included questions on treatment. First primary breast cancer treatment information was abstracted from the medical record from radiation oncology clinic notes for radiation treatment and from systemic adjuvant treatment reports for hormone therapy and chemotherapy. Agreement between MRA and self-reported treatment was assessed with the kappa statistic and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 2808 participants with MRA and self-reported chemotherapy treatment information, 2733 participants with MRA and self-reported hormone therapy information, and 2905 participants with MRA and self-reported radiation treatment information were identified. The median recall window was 12.5 years (range, 2.8-22.2 years). MRA and self-reported treatment agreement was excellent across treatment modalities (kappachemo, 98.5; 95% CI, 97.9-99.2; kappahorm, 87.7; 95% CI, 85.9-89.5; kapparad, 97.9; 95% CI, 97.0-98.7). There was no heterogeneity across recall windows (pchemo = .46; phorm = .40; prad = .61).

Conclusions: Agreement between self-reported and MRA primary breast cancer treatment modality information was excellent for young women diagnosed with breast cancer and was maintained even among women whose recall window was more than 20 years after diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病历摘要与自我报告乳腺癌治疗情况的一致性,延长回忆窗口。
背景:病历摘要(MRA)和自我报告问卷是两种常用于确定癌症治疗信息的方法。之前的研究表明,MRA 和自我报告之间的一致性非常好,但超过 3 年的回忆窗口会如何影响这种一致性,目前尚不清楚:妇女环境癌症和辐射流行病学(WECARE)研究是一项多中心、基于人群的病例对照研究,研究对象为单侧乳腺癌对照者和对侧乳腺癌病例。在 1985 年至 2008 年期间,55 岁之前被诊断为初次患原发性乳腺癌的参与者填写了一份调查问卷,其中包括有关治疗的问题。首次原发性乳腺癌的治疗信息是从放射肿瘤诊所的放射治疗记录以及激素治疗和化疗的系统辅助治疗报告的病历中提取的。用卡帕统计量和相应的95%置信区间(CIs)评估MRA与自我报告治疗之间的一致性:结果:共有 2808 名参与者提供了 MRA 和自我报告的化疗治疗信息,2733 名参与者提供了 MRA 和自我报告的激素治疗信息,2905 名参与者提供了 MRA 和自我报告的放射治疗信息。回忆窗口期的中位数为 12.5 年(范围为 2.8-22.2 年)。在各种治疗方式中,MRA 和自我报告治疗的一致性非常好(kappachemo,98.5;95% CI,97.9-99.2;kappahorm,87.7;95% CI,85.9-89.5;kapparad,97.9;95% CI,97.0-98.7)。不同回忆窗口之间不存在异质性(pchemo = .46;phorm = .40;prad = .61):结论:对于确诊患有乳腺癌的年轻女性而言,自我报告和 MRA 主要乳腺癌治疗方式信息之间的一致性非常好,即使在确诊后 20 多年才开始回忆的女性中也能保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Molecular measurable residual disease before transplantation independently predicts survival and relapse risk in adult lysine methyltransferase 2a-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Racial/ethnic differences in trends of testicular germ cell tumor incidence in the United States, 1992-2021. Long-term risk of carotid stenosis and cerebrovascular disease after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. The importance of studying the implementation of cancer data standards. Agreement of medical record abstraction and self-report of breast cancer treatment with an extended recall window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1