Comparison of Telemedicine Usage at Two Distinct Medicaid-Focused Pediatric Clinics.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2023.0707
Nymisha Chilukuri, Anne R Links, Laura Prichett, Megan Tschudy, Nakiya Showell, Sarah Polk, Eliana M Perrin, Helen K Hughes
{"title":"Comparison of Telemedicine Usage at Two Distinct Medicaid-Focused Pediatric Clinics.","authors":"Nymisha Chilukuri, Anne R Links, Laura Prichett, Megan Tschudy, Nakiya Showell, Sarah Polk, Eliana M Perrin, Helen K Hughes","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2023.0707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021 at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Site A and Site B care for different populations (Site B care for mostly immigrant families with preferred language Spanish). Outcomes included the percent of visits conducted through telemedicine and reason for visit. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable mixed multilevel logistic regression, were used to assess relationship between patient demographics and telemedicine use. <b>Results:</b> Out of 17,142 total visits, 13% of encounters at Site A (<i>n</i> = 987) and 25% of encounters at Site B (<i>n</i> = 2,421) were conducted using telemedicine. Around 13.8% of well-child care (<i>n</i> = 1,515/10,997), 36.2% of mental health care (<i>n</i> = 572/1,581), and 25.0% of acute care/follow-up (<i>n</i> = 1,893/7,562) were telemedicine visits. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in odds of a patient having any telemedicine use by preferred language, sex, or payor. Patients 1-4 years of age had the lowest odds of telemedicine use. At Site A, patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.45), Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66), or other race/ethnicity (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23-0.55) had lower odds of telemedicine use in comparison to Non-Hispanic White. <b>Conclusions:</b> Telemedicine was successfully accessed by Medicaid enrollees for different types of pediatric primary care. There was no difference in telemedicine use by preferred language and payor. However, differences existed by age at both sites and by race/ethnicity at one site. Future research should explore operational factors that improve telemedicine access for marginalized groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"2555-2562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021 at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Site A and Site B care for different populations (Site B care for mostly immigrant families with preferred language Spanish). Outcomes included the percent of visits conducted through telemedicine and reason for visit. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable mixed multilevel logistic regression, were used to assess relationship between patient demographics and telemedicine use. Results: Out of 17,142 total visits, 13% of encounters at Site A (n = 987) and 25% of encounters at Site B (n = 2,421) were conducted using telemedicine. Around 13.8% of well-child care (n = 1,515/10,997), 36.2% of mental health care (n = 572/1,581), and 25.0% of acute care/follow-up (n = 1,893/7,562) were telemedicine visits. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in odds of a patient having any telemedicine use by preferred language, sex, or payor. Patients 1-4 years of age had the lowest odds of telemedicine use. At Site A, patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.45), Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66), or other race/ethnicity (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23-0.55) had lower odds of telemedicine use in comparison to Non-Hispanic White. Conclusions: Telemedicine was successfully accessed by Medicaid enrollees for different types of pediatric primary care. There was no difference in telemedicine use by preferred language and payor. However, differences existed by age at both sites and by race/ethnicity at one site. Future research should explore operational factors that improve telemedicine access for marginalized groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较两家不同的以医疗补助为重点的儿科诊所的远程医疗使用情况。
目的:比较两家以医疗补助为重点的儿科初级保健诊所在使用远程医疗和出诊方面的情况。方法: 回顾性队列研究从 2020 年 3 月 15 日至 2021 年 3 月 15 日,在两家以医疗补助为重点的儿科初级保健诊所进行回顾性队列研究。A 诊所和 B 诊所为不同人群提供医疗服务(B 诊所主要为移民家庭提供医疗服务,首选语言为西班牙语)。结果包括通过远程医疗就诊的百分比和就诊原因。描述性统计、单变量和多变量混合多层次逻辑回归用于评估患者人口统计学特征与远程医疗使用之间的关系。结果显示在总计 17142 次就诊中,13% 的就诊在 A 点进行(n = 987),25% 的就诊在 B 点进行(n = 2421)。约 13.8% 的儿童保健(n = 1,515/10,997 次)、36.2% 的心理保健(n = 572/1,581 次)和 25.0% 的急诊/随访(n = 1,893/7,562 次)是远程医疗就诊。经过协变量调整后,患者使用远程医疗的几率在首选语言、性别或付款人方面没有差异。1-4 岁患者使用远程医疗的几率最低。在站点 A,与非西班牙裔白人相比,自称为非西班牙裔黑人(赔率 [OR] = 0.33,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.24-0.45)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔(OR = 0.40,95% CI = 0.24-0.66)或其他种族/族裔(OR = 0.35,95% CI = 0.23-0.55)的患者使用远程医疗的几率较低。结论医疗补助计划参保者可成功使用远程医疗进行不同类型的儿科初级保健。远程医疗的使用在首选语言和付款人方面没有差异。不过,在两个医疗点,不同年龄的人使用远程医疗的情况存在差异,在一个医疗点,不同种族/族裔的人使用远程医疗的情况也存在差异。未来的研究应探索改善边缘群体远程医疗使用的操作因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam. The Association Between Telehealth Use During Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Acceptability of Forensic Sexual Assault Telehealth Consultation. Taking a Step Back or a Step Forward. Tele-Critical Care, Severity of Illness, and 30-Day Mortality Risk: A Retrospective, Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1