Plant roots reduce rill detachment and shallow instability in forest topsoils

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100921
Misagh Parhizkar , Demetrio Antonio Zema , Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja
{"title":"Plant roots reduce rill detachment and shallow instability in forest topsoils","authors":"Misagh Parhizkar ,&nbsp;Demetrio Antonio Zema ,&nbsp;Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja","doi":"10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The competition between tree and grass roots for water and nutrients under the canopies of forest species may reduce the grass cover and thus increase rill erosion and shallow instability up to the values that are typical of the bare soils. This study has carried out flume experiments at different soil slopes and water flow rates, in order to evaluate rill detachment capacity (D<sub>c</sub>) and erodibility (K<sub>r</sub>) as well as the stability factors of hillslopes with <em>Gleditsia caspica</em> L. (a Fabaceae species, commonly called ‘Persian honeylocust’, a local endemic tree of Northern Iran) in comparison to bare soils. The variability of D<sub>c</sub> has been associated to soil aggregate stability and plant root characteristics as key descriptors of rill erosion and surface stability. D<sub>c</sub> was significantly lower (−41%) in the soil under the canopies compared to the bare sites. This was due to the higher soil aggregate stability (+83%) as well as to the denser and more extended plant root system, as confirmed by the negative correlations between D<sub>c</sub> and soil and root parameters including root total length, mass density and specific root length. K<sub>r</sub> was instead similar for the two soil conditions. The root system of the surface soil layer also played a beneficial action for slope stabilization, increasing the mean safety factor between soils with <em>Gleditsia caspica</em> and bare soils to 1.52 (well over the threshold of 1.3 identifying possible shallow instability). However, this safety factor was the highest at the lower slopes (1.63), and decreased with slope down to 1.39 in the steepest soils. Overall, this study provides indications to land managers on how to contrast soil erosion and shallow instability in delicate forestlands under semi-arid conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452219824000764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The competition between tree and grass roots for water and nutrients under the canopies of forest species may reduce the grass cover and thus increase rill erosion and shallow instability up to the values that are typical of the bare soils. This study has carried out flume experiments at different soil slopes and water flow rates, in order to evaluate rill detachment capacity (Dc) and erodibility (Kr) as well as the stability factors of hillslopes with Gleditsia caspica L. (a Fabaceae species, commonly called ‘Persian honeylocust’, a local endemic tree of Northern Iran) in comparison to bare soils. The variability of Dc has been associated to soil aggregate stability and plant root characteristics as key descriptors of rill erosion and surface stability. Dc was significantly lower (−41%) in the soil under the canopies compared to the bare sites. This was due to the higher soil aggregate stability (+83%) as well as to the denser and more extended plant root system, as confirmed by the negative correlations between Dc and soil and root parameters including root total length, mass density and specific root length. Kr was instead similar for the two soil conditions. The root system of the surface soil layer also played a beneficial action for slope stabilization, increasing the mean safety factor between soils with Gleditsia caspica and bare soils to 1.52 (well over the threshold of 1.3 identifying possible shallow instability). However, this safety factor was the highest at the lower slopes (1.63), and decreased with slope down to 1.39 in the steepest soils. Overall, this study provides indications to land managers on how to contrast soil erosion and shallow instability in delicate forestlands under semi-arid conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物根系可减少森林表土的辙迹剥离和浅层不稳定性
在森林树种的树冠下,树根和草根对水分和养分的竞争可能会降低草的覆盖率,从而增加溪流侵蚀和浅层不稳定性,达到裸露土壤的典型值。本研究在不同的土壤坡度和水流速度下进行了水槽实验,以评估与裸露土壤相比,长有 Gleditsia caspica L.(一种豆科植物,俗称 "波斯金叶女贞",伊朗北部当地特有树种)的山坡的径流剥离能力(Dc)和侵蚀能力(Kr)以及稳定性因素。Dc 的变化与土壤团聚稳定性和植物根系特征有关,是碾压侵蚀和地表稳定性的关键描述指标。与裸露土壤相比,树冠下土壤的 Dc 明显较低(-41%)。Dc 与土壤和根系参数(包括根系总长度、质量密度和比根长度)之间的负相关关系证实了这一点。相反,两种土壤条件下的 Kr 相似。表层土壤的根系对稳定斜坡也起到了有益的作用,它将生长有 Gleditsia caspica 的土壤与裸露土壤之间的平均安全系数提高到了 1.52(远高于 1.3 的临界值,1.3 的临界值表明可能存在浅层不稳定性)。不过,这一安全系数在坡度较低时最高(1.63),随着坡度的降低,在最陡峭的土壤中降至 1.39。总之,这项研究为土地管理者如何对比半干旱条件下脆弱林地的土壤侵蚀和浅层不稳定性提供了指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1