Serving a dip with a salty snack promotes energy intake

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105257
Madeline M. Harper , Paige M. Cunningham , John E. Hayes
{"title":"Serving a dip with a salty snack promotes energy intake","authors":"Madeline M. Harper ,&nbsp;Paige M. Cunningham ,&nbsp;John E. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During eating, exogenous sources of oral lubrication like dips facilitate oral processing, which has been shown to influence food intake. However, few studies have directly assessed how exogenous oral lubrication (via added dip) affects acute intake, especially while snacking. In two laboratory visits, adults (n = 46, 74 % female) were served 70 g of ranch-flavored chips (2.5 servings) with or without 95 g of energy-matched ranch dip, and <em>ad libitum</em> intake was measured. All sessions were video recorded and annotated for number of bites and active eating time (min), which were used to calculate measures of eating microstructure, including eating rate (g/min) and bite size (g/bite). The chips + dip condition yielded 77 % greater intake (64.3 ± 16.2 g versus 36.4 ± 16.2 g; 344.6 ± 86.8 kcal versus 195.1 ± 86.8 kcal; p &lt; 0.001) and a faster total eating rate (p &lt; 0.001) relative to the no-dip control, despite lower initial liking of the dip condition (p = 0.002). However, there was no difference in chip intake (p = 0.83) or chip eating rate (p = 0.11) by condition. Thus, in this chips and dip snack, the greater intake in the dip condition may have been facilitated by a larger total snack bite size (p &lt; 0.001) resulting from dip inclusion, as opposed to faster chip eating rate as a function of the lubricating dip.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 105257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001599","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During eating, exogenous sources of oral lubrication like dips facilitate oral processing, which has been shown to influence food intake. However, few studies have directly assessed how exogenous oral lubrication (via added dip) affects acute intake, especially while snacking. In two laboratory visits, adults (n = 46, 74 % female) were served 70 g of ranch-flavored chips (2.5 servings) with or without 95 g of energy-matched ranch dip, and ad libitum intake was measured. All sessions were video recorded and annotated for number of bites and active eating time (min), which were used to calculate measures of eating microstructure, including eating rate (g/min) and bite size (g/bite). The chips + dip condition yielded 77 % greater intake (64.3 ± 16.2 g versus 36.4 ± 16.2 g; 344.6 ± 86.8 kcal versus 195.1 ± 86.8 kcal; p < 0.001) and a faster total eating rate (p < 0.001) relative to the no-dip control, despite lower initial liking of the dip condition (p = 0.002). However, there was no difference in chip intake (p = 0.83) or chip eating rate (p = 0.11) by condition. Thus, in this chips and dip snack, the greater intake in the dip condition may have been facilitated by a larger total snack bite size (p < 0.001) resulting from dip inclusion, as opposed to faster chip eating rate as a function of the lubricating dip.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将蘸酱与咸味零食一起食用可促进能量摄入
在进食过程中,蘸料等外源性口腔润滑源会促进口腔加工,这已被证明会影响食物摄入量。然而,很少有研究直接评估外源性口腔润滑(通过添加蘸料)如何影响急性摄入量,尤其是在吃零食时。在两次实验室访问中,研究人员向成年人(n = 46,74 % 为女性)提供了 70 克牧场风味薯片(2.5 份),同时添加或不添加 95 克能量匹配的牧场蘸酱,并测量了他们的自由摄入量。所有过程都进行了录像,并对进食次数和活动进食时间(分钟)进行了注释,用于计算进食微观结构的测量值,包括进食率(克/分钟)和进食量(克/口)。与无蘸料对照组相比,薯片+蘸料组的摄入量增加了77%(64.3 ± 16.2 g 对 36.4 ± 16.2 g;344.6 ± 86.8 kcal 对 195.1 ± 86.8 kcal;p < 0.001),总进食率加快了(p < 0.001),尽管最初对蘸料组的喜爱程度较低(p = 0.002)。然而,不同条件下的薯片摄入量(p = 0.83)或薯片进食率(p = 0.11)并无差异。因此,在这款薯片和蘸酱零食中,蘸酱条件下薯片摄入量更大可能是由于蘸酱导致零食总咬碎量更大(p < 0.001),而不是由于润滑蘸酱导致薯片进食速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants Parental norms and attitudes in Relation to Children’s sugar consumption − A mediation analysis of the “Are You Too Sweet?” intervention study Impact of olfactory priming on mental representations of food concepts and subsequent food choice Animal welfare has priority: Swiss consumers’ preferences for animal welfare, greenhouse gas reductions and other sustainability improvements in dairy products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1